I'm a NL player and 5ptbb/100 doesn't seem that abnormal to me, especially since it is heads up where people can go on huge winning streaks.

It's not 5 ptbb/100, it's 9ptbb/100

So how did he do it?

The only way to investigate this properly is to start looking into hand histories, etc....everything else is just hearsay.

Don't be ridiculous. A world where a person can't be declared a superuser based on hands played and winrate from PTR is a a world I just don't want to live in. You take your "facts" and "logic" elsewhere, shill.

Waterboard the Super User and find out what he knows...

Pfffffft...like I'd play at Bodog.

Cereusly.

? They've only been tracking PLO since Oct I think. That means they missed a bunch of the challenge. Not to mention that Durrrr might have played some 200/400 hu plo that wasn't part of the challenge. Not that PTR is entirely accurate, but this example is pretty absurd.

He obviously doesn't offer anything constructive.

he's online now if someone wants to test their luck

just a few thoughts.... I play on Bodog, and I've played about 200K hands since PTR started tracking me. They've missed over 50,000 of those hands. I don't know if PTR is more accurate on other sites, but I know they miss a ton of hands on bodog, and actually I find that HU hands are the ones that are most likely to be missed. Some of my shorter HU sessions don't get seen by PTR at all. Still, the 300K hands they have on him should reflect a random sample of his actual play, even if his real life results since they started tracking are quite different from what PTR is displaying.

Also, 5/10 limit is not exactly high stakes. I don't play limit but I'm sure it isn't difficult to find complete droolers to play against HU at small stakes on Bodog. Add to that that there probably aren't that many good players competing for the fish at the HU limit tables. The good players seem to stick to the NL tables, while the limit side of the room seems relatively empty.

Third point: PTR's grader gives this guy an A overall, meaning that his stats and playing style are inline with the biggest winners at 5/10 HU. So he's spent some time learning to play a good TAG style. If he played badly, or played a bizzare stlye, I might give some creedence to the superuser thing. But it seems much more likely that he's just a well studied player who is taking advantage of the circumstances (HU vs. plenty of degen. gamblers.)

Wow someone says superuser w/o any proof other than what ptr says and internet poker is over..the sky is falling.

would not be suprised at all on that crummy site

haha. but its limit, and its bodog, so who cares?

i watched beater play and he is not a superuser...i also watched him play on ftp and he wins there as well...not at such a big winrate but he's solid. I alsp spoke to him in chat and he's not a bot..

That settles it, close thread....

lol...Bodog is a great site, sorry for your loss....