Quote:
Originally Posted by grenzen
So just to get this straight, you have accepted that a 3rd party is involved, and that your account funds just didn't disappear into someone's hands at the poker site? That's what I'm concluding from your own comments.
I think OP was pretty clear and then restated what he thought later. He always believed a third party logged into his account and lost his money. After he found out the site confirmed his balance of around $10k 15 hours AFTER the money was gone and ACR told him there were no suspicious IP's logging in when there clearly were and that they also concluded, after their 2 minute investigation there was no evidence of chip dumping after telling him they play were the money was lost was very poor, as well as some other things that were off in what they were saying he thought to himself "Why are they saying all these things that are clearly not true? Could they be in on it?"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winning_TD
Just to let everyone know i am still here and have been following the thread. I havent just disappeared.
The CEO will post tomorrow after the investigation is complete but one thing i can 100% confirm with you all is that it is conclusive that no chip dumping took place.
These comments aren't helping ACR's image here. You shouldn't be confirming anything until after completing a thorough investigation. Otherwise it looks like your investigation is directed at confirming your conclusions instead of aimed at trying to figure out what happened to OP's money.
You guys are coming across some of those crazy restaurant owners on yelp that instead of listening to complaints with an open mind.
When one of your customers reports a substantial amount of money is missing.. what type of online poker room do you want to be?
- One that does little to help their customer and just spends time trying to confirm the site has no liability.
- One that even though doesn't have liability for the lost funds, uses the mechanisms and expertise in fraud detection/prevention can assist their customer to find out what happened to their money and provide information useful in recovering it like information that may lead to the identity of the person logging into the account.
- Same as 2 but also tries to recover funds from where the money went to if it can reasonably be confirmed that there was chip dumping or joyr riding.
- One that says screw our ToS, here's your money, we'll figure things out on our end.
So far it looks like you're ok with being 1. IMO, as an unregulated site you should at least be 2, preferably 3 since your customers probably have little other recourse. Cop says: "So you had some money on an offshore site that's operating illegally in this jurisdiction, someone hacked into your account and stole your money and now you want me to find out what happened? lol"
As crazy as some people may think it would be to be 4, that's how some of the best and biggest companies operate. They assume the liability, now that the money stolen is theirs they have more incentive to try and recover it. The cost of recovery (and cost when there can't be recovery) as well as the cost that helps minimize these occurrences in the first place is account for ahead of time.