Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Anyone else impressed with Smith on Poker After Dark? What do you know about him? Anyone else impressed with Smith on Poker After Dark? What do you know about him?

09-06-2009 , 02:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SizzlerFTW
wahahahh
yes I do consider that fortunate. I suspect someone else put them on line. But thanks, Gavin.

Last edited by machaut; 09-06-2009 at 02:32 AM.
Anyone else impressed with Smith on Poker After Dark? What do you know about him? Quote
09-06-2009 , 07:58 AM
lol @ flatcall
Anyone else impressed with Smith on Poker After Dark? What do you know about him? Quote
09-06-2009 , 07:37 PM
I played with him at the BCPC he literally plays 60/10. He cold called me twice with KK in like 3-4 hours of play totally lol style.
Anyone else impressed with Smith on Poker After Dark? What do you know about him? Quote
09-06-2009 , 07:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by machaut
Does he have any books? What's his style, philosophy? Who would you most compare him with? They say he has two wins on PAD in four tries, which is great. I didn't see those episodes, so this is my first time seeing him. They said he used to be a taxi driver and Phil Gordon said he's gotten much better after he stopped drinking. If he can do it, why can't anyone do it? Do you think he's computing EV numbers or just playing on gut instinct?
Well if you saw him in person, you would def think he has an advantage with his ''gut'' instincts...
Anyone else impressed with Smith on Poker After Dark? What do you know about him? Quote
09-06-2009 , 07:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir S A Lot
Well if you saw him in person, you would def think he has an advantage with his ''gut'' instincts...
I already think that now, after the three big plays he made to Barry Greenstein this last week. The first two folds, the third a call. He also played aggressively to be only the 2nd player to knock out all opponents on that show. I wish they would put together a DVD of 'Director's Cut' shows cause I think it would sell, due to us being able to study their thought processes when making the big decisions that are highlighted and discussed on that program. If I had a VCR or DVD recorder, I'd be recording them in order to study later. Right now, much of what they say is over my head. It would make more sense once I've studied more.

The announcer didn't mention it, but when Smith picked up three stacks of $5K cash each, and in his words, did a 'stare down,' (it wasn't much of a stare down, he just paused and may have barely glanced at his face), Greenstein, who was bluffing, blinked his eyes nervously and swallowed. Don't know if Smith noticed those tells or not. But he acknowledges that that is the point that he decided what to do. I've seen players, in the midst of their decision, stare at the other player in a showdown for a few seconds, and less often, actually pick up their cash, hold it, and see how the other person reacts. I don't know if that move, the holding of the cask, is intentional to get the person to act nervous, but I see bluffers acting nervous all the time. A savvy move to me, would be to do an acting job of something nervous when you aren't bluffing to get someone to call. When Phil Helmuth bluffs, he sits up in the chair, leans forward at the table on his elbows, (even more than usual), and covers his mouth with his two cupped hands, another nervous combination of moves that people like Matasow have never picked up on cause they keep folding to him. He might as well be saying, "Please call my bluff, please call my bluff you idiot donkey." I've never played for a dollar in my life and I can see it. Don't know why they can't. I guess that means that once I learn, I should be pretty good if I can learn to study boards and odds quickly. I'm not a fast thinker and don't have a good memory for specific cards that fell 15 years ago like Helmuth can. (Although I have a pretty good memory for historical events, that doesn't translate to a good postal exam test taker when they give you one minute to study addresses in boxes, then take it away and make you sort addresses in Box A, B, C, or D. Such a memory can only help evaluate players and remember what they did, a big part of the game. I've always liked my gut instincts in other facets of my life. And I'm usually right. And when I'm wrong, I don't usually regret my decision. I don't think most poker players have gotten past the beginner holdem books that try to tell you that you need to always determine the nuts, whether or not you have it, what it would take to get it, and how many ways your opponent can beat you heads up if you commit to this pot. I think most people just 'wing it' based on if the flop hit, and whether or not they feel bold enough to bet many chips to hit their card on the turn and river. I don't even think they're figuring outs either. But the black guy, the amateur Oceans 11 actor who lasted longer than the other two amateurs, hit the nail on the head when he said that if you don't have the nuggets to keep throwing chips in the pot and take a chance all the way to the river, and one hand after the next, you can't compete with the top level guys who can. Both Barry and Gavin were doing that. Barry was doing continuation bets like they were going out of style, daring Gavin to keep up. Gavin did, and as he said later, the luck was in 'the deck hitting me over the head' which I guess is his lingo for 'the cards fell the right way for me.' I still think there was more to it than that. The same cards could have hit a lessor player over the head and they wouldn't know what to do with them. I guess I started this post cause I had never seen him play before and liked his routine. The first player who played like that to get my attention was Phil Ivey. I had never heard of him either. Then I noticed Negreanu doing it. They both kept leading with calls or raised with marginal hands at best. When no one calls, they keep doing it, hand after hand, til someone does. Then in reading Harrington on Hold em last week where he talks about playing styles, sure enough, he confirms that Negreanu and Ivey are very loose. I don't know that Gavin starts out a hand with that intention, but if you challenge him, he won't hesitate to put the peddle to the metal. I've heard it asked, "What player would you most fear, heads up?" After seeing Gavin, I think he would be my answer. I'd feel like I wouldn't have a clue what he was doing or what he had. He doesn't give off tells. He never looks nervous like the cat that just ate the canary. You have no clue.

Some glossaries define 'flat call' as just 'a call without raising,' which seems pointless. Others define it as 'a call when you'd expect a raise.'

Last edited by machaut; 09-06-2009 at 08:22 PM.
Anyone else impressed with Smith on Poker After Dark? What do you know about him? Quote
09-06-2009 , 08:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenSmoke85
I played with him at the BCPC he literally plays 60/10. He cold called me twice with KK in like 3-4 hours of play totally lol style.
I don't know what you mean when you say 'he literally plays 60/10.'
Anyone else impressed with Smith on Poker After Dark? What do you know about him? Quote
09-08-2009 , 07:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by machaut
I don't know what you mean when you say 'he literally plays 60/10.'
sorry its online talk, the first number is how often he puts money in the pot, so imo he plays 60 percent of the hands( this was at a full ring table btw) then the other number is how often when he put money in he was raising.

Basically someone w those stats = fish

if you still don't get it I would assume someone can chime it and explain it in a more concise matter.
Anyone else impressed with Smith on Poker After Dark? What do you know about him? Quote
09-08-2009 , 10:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenSmoke85
Basically someone w those stats = fish
Most of the time, but not always.

In live games, especially, there are players who can do that profitably.
Anyone else impressed with Smith on Poker After Dark? What do you know about him? Quote
09-08-2009 , 12:04 PM
On the WSOP last week, Todd Bruson busted out of the Main Event and went and talked to Gavin. Gavin was still playing. Todd said he'd wait a hand or two (to see if Smiths busts) then he's heading to find a bar. Gavin busted some time later and as he's walking out he says "I gotta find Brunson".

Both these guys drink vodka like fish, from what I've gathered. I'm assuming they went sober for the ME (or maybe even the entire Series), but as soon as they busted the ME, jumped back in the barrel.
Anyone else impressed with Smith on Poker After Dark? What do you know about him? Quote
09-08-2009 , 04:48 PM
Gavin was so f*kin steaming during the PAD when he beat Ivey HU. His post-victory interview was absolutely hilarious....he was obviously trying not to come over as mingindrunk, but he was babbling and slurring like a motherf*ker. Gold.
Anyone else impressed with Smith on Poker After Dark? What do you know about him? Quote
09-08-2009 , 04:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenSmoke85
sorry its online talk, the first number is how often he puts money in the pot, so imo he plays 60 percent of the hands( this was at a full ring table btw) then the other number is how often when he put money in he was raising.

Basically someone w those stats = fish

if you still don't get it I would assume someone can chime it and explain it in a more concise matter.
Where did you go to find those stats on him?
Anyone else impressed with Smith on Poker After Dark? What do you know about him? Quote
09-08-2009 , 06:44 PM
he read gavin's soul through gut instinct
Anyone else impressed with Smith on Poker After Dark? What do you know about him? Quote

      
m