Quote:
Originally Posted by dgirl
As far as the patronizing thing, I personally disagree with you Wilbury. In fact, I sort of think the opposite. Maybe if more men took this "White-knight" approach it would become less acceptable amongst men to behave like that towards women. If I speak up or defend myself, it just throws flames on the fire. If countless male peers let it be known that behavior isn't acceptable, there's at least a chance it could make a difference.
Respect.
I actually was referring more to the whole white-knight/damsel-in-distress mentality in general. Obviously, anyone behaving reprehensibly to anyone else (male or female) deserves to get called out for it. However, I'm also quite relieved to hear that you find it to be the opposite of patronizing. (TL;DR ahead).
One of my acquaintances has long been a local self-appointed crusader for women's empowerment. He's not exactly wealthy, but sufficiently well-off that years ago he and his wife hired as a personal assistant a single mom who had fallen on hard times. They pay her very well and even helped provide for the daughter -- things like enrolling her in summer camps, etc. I think the assistant and daughter stayed in the guest portion of their home but I'm less sure about that.
Naturally, I always found it to be very noble and even aspired to reach a point where I could possibly do the same. That is, until I heard my boss and co-worker at the time go off about him. One of them, can't remember which, put it best: he acted like his assistant's race and gender were disabilities, and thus he was doing her a favor. My boss in particular was a successful businesswoman who had moved up in the profession because she was smart and capable, not because some man was always there to serve as training wheels*.
Now, I was, and still am, a very ardent supporter of women's athletics. It has quite literally been my entire profession, as a highly disproportionate amount of my work and efforts have been with our women's teams. As was said in a previous post, I'm sure that I came across as an obnoxious white-knight type early on. Hearing my office colleagues grouse about this philanthropist served as an eye-opener (or ear-opener), and made me very cognizant of my own table image, if you will. I serve my athletes because I have the utmost respect for what they do. The last thing I would ever want is for my teams to think that I see them as some sort of charity case**.
Anyway, appreciate the reply, Dgirl. Equally eye-opening, I must say!
* In fairness, it could be that she disliked him not for his cause but because he spent so many calories reminding others about it. He reportedly once told one of our men's coaches to "prove to your wife and daughter every day that you're not a male chauvinist."
** This applies to my one men's team, too, as water polo so often rests at the bottom of the totem pole at other schools.