Quote:
Originally Posted by capone0
subtle brags?
wasn't even that subtle, point is winrate wise in constructed and arena I'm probably top 10 or 20 in EU in the ladder/arena format so I have a pretty good idea of what the meta currently looks like, how refined the decks are and how the meta is going to change. if you check my posting history you'll notice that I was right on pretty much every prediction I made with regards to strong cards/decks in the past.
I'm not just "whining" about a deck because I don't know how to counter it and wanted to clarify this before the first person posts a warrior deck with 4x armorsmith and justicar and tells me how he has a 75% winrate vs pirate warrior.
Quote:
meta is what a few days old--things will adjust. if pirate get's insanely out of control some things will be nerfed. feels like they want more decks to play taunt/heal to deal with all the aggro which didn't exist that much in the last meta--shaman had taunts but no heal. When people don't have many cards of course they will go with the cheap pirate warrior until more cards are earned. This has happened before--it was called face hunter and it was quickly ran out for a few metas.
this is the problem. blizzard isn't exactly known for changing things quickly. also reno decks work opposite to what you expect when it comes to deck building, they actually allow for less variety. there will be a dragon and a non dragon version of reno mage/priest and these lists will be ~4 cards different to what you see right now, a few days after release.
the main issue is that unless you make your deck awful against other control decks, youll be stuck losing to some monkeys who do nothing but send everything to your face rougly 40% of the time. If this deck didn't exist we could have fun matches of hearthstone, as described in my previous post.
so to see people say this deck is fine is pretty tilting