Quote:
Originally Posted by razztapes
My thought processes aswell. No one ITT has defended the pie stance in a satisfactory way. I've been wrong before though
I'd really like to let this rest, but come on.. have you read the thread? This stuff has been covered.
1) we do not know who is behind the plot
2) we do not know who the intended target was
3) there may have been multiple targets or multiple acceptable targets
4) there may have been a wide range of acceptable collateral damage
Without at least some of this information, it's impossible to really rule out either the pie or the wine.