Quote:
Originally Posted by Jbrochu
Isn't it good for you guys if a donk is grinding tons of tables regardless of whether or not he's a red pro?
No, it's pretty bad for other decent players usually. Here's how it works. Most of the higher levels are pretty well saturated with good players, so it's usually necessary to either practice some sort of table selection or just take the ROI hit and hope your hopefully doesn't suffer as well. Assuming the red pro is at least break-even without the rake, he can sign up for whatever he wants. That means there is one player that doesn't have to worry about table selection, and he can ruin everyone else's profitability without ruining his own.
Here's an example. Scotty, MJCACE, me, a red pro, and an infinite pool of fish are staring at a $236 6-max lobby. If the tournametn were to go off with just me and five fish, say my ROI is 10%. With either Scotty or MJC there, my ROI is likely to drop, say to 3%. If both play, my ROI is -3% (as are theirs) and we all break even after rakeback, or maybe they make a little money because they are slightly better at beating me than I am at beating them. In reality, if two of us are in teh game, the third one shouldn't be signing up, so the games stay profitable for me. Now put red pro in there. Even if he isn't as good, and my ROI drops by less, I'm still looking at situations where Scotty or MJC is in the game, and I can still sign up profitably, but then red-pro comes in behind us, and now I'm back to breaking even after rakeback. At a minimum, my ROI is dropping from 3% to -1 or -2%, and with 3% rakeback, my effective ROI is being cut by over 2/3. Red-pro's ROI in that tournament can by -8% and he's still OK. He can sign up for tournaments profitably that other players can't, and when he does, it ruin other people's profitability but not his.
Sorry, kind of long and confusing...