Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
PokerStars MTT Thread PokerStars MTT Thread

04-27-2016 , 10:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spudhead
There are many players both reg and rec alike that prefer playing 9 handed over 6 handed and I think it would be unanimously agreed that there should be some full ring mtts on the schedule.
+1
make normal 9max tables as it was before, o8 is now not playable.

Last edited by SmallStakeGrinder; 04-27-2016 at 11:03 AM.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 11:03 AM
kind a shady that addons are displayed the way they are, not even sure that's legal..
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 11:09 AM
Sat playing 2.20 horse $57 top prize, usually i'd have 4 games going at this time, really bad times. Thanks alot Luke for not giving any time to any game bar holdem and junking every game that was +EV for me.

Bring back the 8max courchevel 1.10c 3x turbo rebuy, I killed that game, now its gone.

Very sad times.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 11:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by robtherock
Luke,

I appreciate you're going to be VERY busy right now but I have some feedback for you which I’m sure the whole mixed games community will agree with. Please take the following on board;

Firstly

BRING BACK THE WEEKLYS.

Don’t even continue reading this or replying to anything else until they are back on the schedule. Not having them is ridiculous (even though I would LOVE to have my Saturdays back )
Saying we’re trying to grow mixed games organically and removing everything daily above a $55 is absurd.

If the aim of these changes were to grow the games organically every rebuy/addon wouldn’t getting raked as it will make the playerpool go broke quicker or reduce the prizepools.

How can you expect these games to grow if there is nothing to grow into. Last year the 215 weeklies were stopped in place of an 82 then brought back the following week. The 82’s have taken off.. (Much to the detriment of the 215’s which now have ~40% less entrants) IMO they certainly shouldn't have had the same structure but at least the 82’s were generally very successful. (keep them as they were please, i.e some 9max some 6max)

How can you expect mixed players to lump up for the H scoops and wcoops when the biggest daily game being spread is a $55 entry? The jump from the 530’s to the 2k’s was virtually impossible as it is.

One good point here; congrats on the success of the $320 PLO/8 tonight. Switching that to a Monday has done it a world of good and I’m very excited to see what happens with the $320 PLO on Wednesday! The NLO/8 on friday would surely attract more players if it runs alongside the Thursday Thrill as a lot of players who enter that would give the NLO/8 a try, especially if it becomes a PSKO. Just look at the growth of that game format over the past year! It would be nice to have one of these bigger tournaments as a 9max structure, particularly the NLO/8 as it has antes.

Which brings me onto not having any 9max omaha? Most recs prefer full ring tables over 6max! Not giving players the choice of any 9max at all is a poor decision.

Revert the NLO/8 PSKO at 18.32 (GMT) back to 9max please purely for some variety. People don’t want to play the same comp over and over all day.
Today I played the $2 NLO/8 splash. 90mins of rebuys in a 6max tournament is absurd, revert them back to 9max or the the rebuys ending at BB 2.5k/5k please. I’m fairly sure the longevity of these tournaments will not last as people are spending SO much for the same first place + then there's extra rake. Lets not get greedy with all those extra 20cents. 60mins is long enough.

The $55 PLO/8 reentry had 8minute blinds the whole way through today, as it’s replaced the 82plo/8 re entry at least keep it the same structure ie 8/10/12min blinds.

The $55 omania is nearly double the buy of its predecessor yet with a similar field size first place was still the same! 181 runners and 29 are being paid! Firstly lol at the bubble bursting with 29ppl in a 6max comp and secondly way too many are getting paid with not nearly enough up top.

The $3.30 PLO 6max rebuy was removed, what the reasoning behind this? Surely this is exactly the sort of tournament that your ‘organic growth’ promotes.

Thanks for your consideration, few little tweaks and all looks good
+1,000,000
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 11:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregz41
I think my biggest problems with the VLT's is that they don't reflect the various stages of tournaments. I made a comment that in the H55 yesterday, despite being on the final table, we were still considerably far away from reaching the level requirement for 6 mins. This is badly designed because it fails to utilise the purpose of VLT's.

I think if we can categorise tournaments having various phases of play into something like the following:

1. Initial stages - While not often significant to the outcome of the tournament, this is a phase that should provide players with a chance to provide players with an opportunity to play deep stack situations and across multiple streets. Suggested Level Times:
Bigs 8
BB 7
Hots 4

2. Early Middle - Pre flop all ins become more common as stacks fluctuate more than the early stages. Pots become more significant. Play across multiple streets is still important, but should often end with a player being eliminated from the tournament. This stage should end with the bubble being burst, thus preventing stalling issues.
Suggested Level Times:
Bigs 9
BB 8
Hots 5

3. Middle - Average stack usually falls as a result of the bubble effect. This phase should provide players a chance to build a stack up for the final few tables.
Suggested Level Times:
Bigs 10
BB 9
Hots 5

4. Late - This phase I consider to be the final 3 or even 2 tables depending on the field size. Pots have significant impacts on players expected value of the prize pool. Play should lengthen to ensure the game is not a crapshoot.
Suggested Level Times:
Bigs 12
BB 10
Hots 6

5. Finale - This phase I consider to be around the bubble of the final table downwards. Pots have extreme impact on players expected value. Like the previous phase, the goal here should be able to provide players with a chance to play poker and not be resigned to their only option being to shove pre flop and hope to run good. A healthy balance of both is important obviously.
Suggested Level Times:
Bigs 15
BB 12
Hots 6

A few notes on my reasons for why I selected different level times across the 3 brands.

Bigs should be the best structure - vanilla poker designed to play multiple streets and a long game experience.

Bounty Builders have knockout prizes thus reducing fold equity and causing the average stack to stay fairly healthy. Play doesn't need to be as slow the Bigs.

Hots are obviously designed to be quick and fast paced. Great for players who want short sessions. The increase in level times later on should reduce the crapshoot factor, while not impacting too heavily on an increase in time due to the early levels being shorter.

Just my 2c's.
Great post 100% agree with all of this. Main thing i noticed when i studied some structures was the level design seemed poor. Levels going up at 100/200k for example in small field bb/hots just seems poorly utilised. Need a smoother transition on levels so every level is realisticly used and this in turn should fix the structures.

Im glad to hear you are taking this seriously Luke. Dont recall seeing a backlash in MTTc of this magnitude ever. Usually just moaning regs itt as we know but the sheer amount of small stakes rec players unhappy must be a big concern to you.

Cliffs.

Your massive player base aren't going to accept being force fed hyper pskos only.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 11:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerStars Luke
All non-satellite Splash tournaments have been redeployed with a version of the old structure. This one was simply an oversight on my part and I apologize.
So, because this was an error by stars, meaning players were massively overcharged on rake, you'll be issuing rake refunds ASAP to all players who entered the erroneous tournaments......
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 11:39 AM
i for one don't appreciate responses that dont address the other major issues people are having.

Luke where is your comment on adding more regular speed tournaments? what are you planning to do with the non NLHE schedule? any plans to improve the mirco/low stake tournament schedule which people have said their options were severely reduced? what about HU tournaments?

IF YOU DON'T PLAN ON CHANGING ANY OF THESE THINGS TELL US!!!

some comment is better than none. you are leaving a lot of people hanging here and it's not very respectable.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 11:40 AM
I'm off stars. This is bull****tt.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 11:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregz41
I think my biggest problems with the VLT's is that they don't reflect the various stages of tournaments. I made a comment that in the H55 yesterday, despite being on the final table, we were still considerably far away from reaching the level requirement for 6 mins. This is badly designed because it fails to utilise the purpose of VLT's.

I think if we can categorise tournaments having various phases of play into something like the following:

1. Initial stages - While not often significant to the outcome of the tournament, this is a phase that should provide players with a chance to provide players with an opportunity to play deep stack situations and across multiple streets. Suggested Level Times:
Bigs 8
BB 7
Hots 4

2. Early Middle - Pre flop all ins become more common as stacks fluctuate more than the early stages. Pots become more significant. Play across multiple streets is still important, but should often end with a player being eliminated from the tournament. This stage should end with the bubble being burst, thus preventing stalling issues.
Suggested Level Times:
Bigs 9
BB 8
Hots 5

3. Middle - Average stack usually falls as a result of the bubble effect. This phase should provide players a chance to build a stack up for the final few tables.
Suggested Level Times:
Bigs 10
BB 9
Hots 5

4. Late - This phase I consider to be the final 3 or even 2 tables depending on the field size. Pots have significant impacts on players expected value of the prize pool. Play should lengthen to ensure the game is not a crapshoot.
Suggested Level Times:
Bigs 12
BB 10
Hots 6

5. Finale - This phase I consider to be around the bubble of the final table downwards. Pots have extreme impact on players expected value. Like the previous phase, the goal here should be able to provide players with a chance to play poker and not be resigned to their only option being to shove pre flop and hope to run good. A healthy balance of both is important obviously.
Suggested Level Times:
Bigs 15
BB 12
Hots 6

A few notes on my reasons for why I selected different level times across the 3 brands.

Bigs should be the best structure - vanilla poker designed to play multiple streets and a long game experience.

Bounty Builders have knockout prizes thus reducing fold equity and causing the average stack to stay fairly healthy. Play doesn't need to be as slow the Bigs.

Hots are obviously designed to be quick and fast paced. Great for players who want short sessions. The increase in level times later on should reduce the crapshoot factor, while not impacting too heavily on an increase in time due to the early levels being shorter.

Just my 2c's.
good post +1
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 11:43 AM
Great job with the 109 zoom, really nice seeing an empty slot for a 109 being cancelled everyday. Could you not perhaps make it a normal FO or even a ****ing progressive super KO? Hellooo
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 11:51 AM
Will there be a response about payouts i wonder, the most damaging of recent changes imo
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 11:57 AM
Hey luke, the prob w structure is that u have to make every big/hot different, you cant drop the same at b109 and b3.

Give it a change, u will have a lot of work looking deep in the past tornaments, but will worth it. And fix the ****ing payouts, please!
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 11:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerStars Luke
New pay table

The new pay table has been introduced into all Big/Hot tournaments and many other daily tournaments. In the future, we'll be creating and implementing more pay tables. The goal is and has been from the start to lower the disparity in payouts at the final table, pay more players, and reduce the overall amount of money at the final table by a nominal amount.

It is worth noting that the overall implementation will be more nuanced than this first iteration. A 6-max $1,050 tournament will not have a 16.6% pay table. Many pay tables will be created to suit different player bases.

We believe this change is a way to maintain our current guarantees and prize pools, in part by encouraging recreational players to play more scheduled tournaments because they will win more often. This is a long-term play and will be rolled out over the coming months.
he already commented on the payouts before the new tournament schedule was released. they have been out for over 2 weeks now, so people were complaining a while ago. doesn't sound like they will be changing anytime soon...
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 12:00 PM
Dear PokerStars

Your goal is pretty obvious right now. You guys are so desperate and greedy for more MONEY that you basically willing to do anything no matter how big the sacrfice is.

That's fine. 90% of big companies are just willing to slash ppl's throat for a nickle.

But please do not try to justify and explain your so called "changes" and "improvements". These current updates to MTT's are no more than BADLY CONCEALED, DESPERATE AND VERY OBVIOUS ATTEMPT TO SQUEEZE OUT MORE MONEY.

Didn't realize you guys were hurting THAT bad and you are THAT far off from your projected yearly income.

Or is it just greed? Whichever it is, please stop with the bullsh*t. You guys are interested in one (and only one) thing: M O N E Y

Short-term money making, nothing more.

Good job!
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 12:05 PM
i don't even know why i bother commenting in this thread anymore cause it seems obvious PS doesn't care in the least about our complaints and will do nothing to satisfy them. not one person has said they like the new pay table, yet here it remains. we are talking to a brick wall for the most part.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 12:06 PM
I am late coming to do this as I haven't been on 2p2 for a while, but I'm going to have my say also.

I am purely a micro stakes recreational player. Most months I play less than 30 MTT's. I used to enjoy the game selection and would frequently play the $2.20 $4K GT at 18:45 GMT, the $1.35 KO now and again at 18:15 and the $3.30 PLO at 18:35. I won the latter a couple of years back when the guarantee was $1500 (sick brag huh). Prior to the latest schedule changes this was down to a $750 GT. I could also happily dip in to $2.20 HORSE and 8-Game MTT's between 6 and 9pm.

Now the game choice is woefully inadequate if you want to play 'normal' poker. The schedule is dominated by gimmick MTT's paying 17% of the field (with min cashes being less than 1.4 x buy in a lot of the time), with 4 minute, 7 minute, 8 minute levels and 2-3 re-entries allowed. This only encourages the reckless bingo players to go wild and invariably suck out with something like Q4o!

I filtered the schedule for PLO / NLHE micro MTT's (reg / turbo speed, single entry, excluding KO's) and absolutely nothing appealed.

I don't want to play bounty builders.

I don't want to play bingo, hyper speed spin and go's.

I don't want to play 5 card Omaha / Courchevel.

I don't want to play the latest novelty 'challenges'.

I don't want to see or hear pointless Neymar / Ronaldo / Nadal promotions.

I want to play normal poker. Poker in it's many variations is beautiful. Abusing it in cynical exploitation of bread and butter players as PS has done makes me sick to my stomach.

I know elite cash game players are unhappy too about game selection, rake, VPP's etc so there must be few players left that PS has not yet managed to piss off. I'm sure before long though they will.

I don't think PS will ever be the same again so I only have 1 question. Which site now offers the best micro MTT's in standard formats?

Last edited by JMT1202; 04-27-2016 at 12:14 PM. Reason: typo
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 12:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerStars Luke
Hey all,

We're taking your concerns about the structures seriously and I'll be making a separate post addressing them before the end of the week.

Here is what I personally believe this very limited statement actually means. Please, prove me wrong. How to speak Amayastars/Predictions:

Sigh... low stakes rec players are smarter than we thought. Even though we don't want to, we are forced to take your concerns seriously and we have to find a way to dance around actually addressing them which is going to take until the end of the week. Notice I use the word "address." Don't expect any actual changes, otherwise I might have used that word. I need a few days to come up with the best possible excuses to move forward with turbo stars. I will be talking with the head shills to figure out a way to resell you an all turbo format since you guys saw through it like glass. We might throw in some withered micros to placate the low stakes players who we said we were looking out for. If that doesn't work to quiet at least 25% of you, we come up with a very bad compromise that we will tell you is great for poker and rec players. Just remember guys, scoop is coming, so don't quit now!

ALSO, I fixed unplayable "splash" format. YOU'RE WELCOME.

Last edited by Free99; 04-27-2016 at 12:18 PM.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 12:13 PM
sigh, some people here really need to calm down
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 12:14 PM
It's an absolute farce what they're doing to the structures. They just treat us like braindead monkeys. In the past 2 days i had top30-finishes in the $55 bountybuilder (twice), the $44bountybuilder and a 90th in the $33 bountybuilder. They are treating us like ******s with these special "longer levels later in the tournament" as the levels wont EVER be reached anyway. Yay we get 10min levels after 42lvls @ 15k/30k??? and EVEN TWELVE MINUTES after lvl55 @100k/200k ?!?!?! how sick, this means real nice slow play in latestage!!!. Well guess ****ing what. final2tables are reached at somewhere around lvl35, where we JUST switched from 8minutes to 9minutes (WOOOHOOO). at the 100k200k 12minlevel, theres about 20bb IN PLAY IN THE WHOLE TOURNEY

Seriously every tourney is a turbo now, theres practically no difference between 5min turbos and 8min "regspeeds". FFS as everyone in this thread told you, theres HEAPS AND HEAPS of things to play for those guys who dont wanna "waste" 8hrs of tourneyplay etc. they can play sngs, 180men, spins, turbos, hypers, you name it. Just let us have normal ****ing POKER TOURNAMENTS. This is seriously ****ed up.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 12:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sattla
Hey i want to start of by saying that i played your omaha schedule almost as good as every day for the last 2 years and i have actively been requesting tournaments/addons, which always has been for the better (like the rebuy sattys for 82/215 weeklys) and i actually believe that this new one is better in the way of tournaments round the clock so i'm very pleased with that.

I played the first day of the new schedule and took today of to reflect what i thought of it. I have also gathered most the info i get from most regs i speak with we are around 50 ppl in a skype channel and we all agree at some points which i will raise in the end of my post.

I actually got some of the things i wanted and 5cplo/plo8 psko is very nice even if the buyin is 11 and 5 card play very well i totally agree with that.

Also the small hypers are something i requested so pleased with it, i also dont mind the reentrys i more money in pool.

The Omanias i guess it just a question to adapt but i dont like that you took a level away it's fast enough 6 max.

320 is very nice addon i like it very much and all 3 formats get a tourney on i belived it was abit quick even for a 10k start but smashing prize pool like that i have not seen in a weeky since? god knows.. 139 buyins in total is just sick for a 320 plo8 since it's the least played omaha format and the 530 had like 60 tops only more when events ran. This is for sure a winner.


I also like the "Special Omanias" on Saturday that's going to be awsome to grind! im really looking forward to that. but i would really like to see some other options then 4 stack.

Also the special buyin on the mixed games is nice i really like that but you forgot about stud08/Razz which is sad whose should be added as well.

All these things are for sure very good addons.

But of course some of the changes made really made me wonder how much time you thought about this.

First of all Omaha is played 9 max as well as 6 max to make every single tournament 6 max is just a no brainer. Change tournaments doing very well as 9 max to 6 max is terrible for ppl trying to multi table. (so you make more money) I really dont enjoy playing ONLY six max with zero options to even get a single 9 handed. With the amount of turbos the schedule is not possible to play 6 handed simply takes way to much focus and plays to fast to "PLAY" omaha instead of just clicking. I know i will be cutting my max tables with at least half and i know more ppl will to(which makes you loose money) i truly hope and recommend you speak with some regs before making these huge change. Just like NLHE plo/plo/nlo8 is PLAYED 9 MAX its actually a fantastic format there is not a singel motivation to force 6max only this need to change fast. NLHE cash game is also dominated with 6 max but what would you think the NLHE community would say if you make every NLHE tournament 6 max with that motivation?

The splats tournaments are not totally unplayable 2 3 levels before addon a rebuy is not a blind, 6 max this is a satty format and its useless.
The addon is barely 3bb its like playing a super hyper hyper should be named "flip" not splat. Got to come back to old blind level.

The late 3+r plo with 2k rebuys is also gone same thing there just a big WHY.

And there is no slow plo8 rebuys at all the only one we had which was alot of ppl favorite tourney 11+r aka 5+r is gone but you keep the rebuy plo?
There are several way to make this tournament good just extend the rebuy period with 2 3 levels and make the 7.50 and put a 2k gtd. From your new rake rebuy perspective removing a rebuy tournament cant be a profit move. This was a tournament which we built our late shift on and i hope we can make it comeback. I even kept playing it even since i would rake over 1k extra on a year same with most regs.

My biggest concern is really the weekly's why would you take away the 55/82/215 where you made money, both from sattys and from the buyins. You dont need to have the gtds over 10k put them all on 8k if your loosing that much money that you haft to remove them?. Those got to comeback those where with out no doubt the highlight for us.This is just like killing us of and it does not make you more money most likely less? This is the biggest drawback for the 4 card community i think most ppl agree with that.

We really need to make some changes here to make this playable for profit:

1. Bring back weeklys 55/82/215 with all the sattys for them.

2. At least 50% of the tournaments needs to be 9max you really need to consult a reg or two here.

3. Rebuy tournaments for 320 3+r 3xturbo should be 3 4 for each format. (with the nlo8 NOT having the splat format but the plo8 format with antes)

4. Get rid of the NLO/NLO5 card tournaments make one PLO8 and one PLO this format is dead you first killed of the freeze outs (22/11) and kept the nlo 5card 2.20+r with a 500 gtd which had overlay just let the format die.

5. Bring back the level you removed in omanias it's fast enough 6 max.

6. 9max rebuy plo8 must comeback.

7. The late omania plo8 11 does not meet the GTD make it 16.50 and problem solved with 2k gtd.

8. Bring back the old payouts EU lunch omania use to be atleast 650 up top and 27 top at start of itm Now it payed 515 and first ITM 43 not a great.

Suggestions for Omanias on Saturdays is to make it the same format as the 320's to make more people use to it and since they are more expensive. Or a 2 stack wit 2x5k stack would also work you could also extend the late reg with 30 mins and after late reg have 12/15 min blinds to give it more value it's fast enough six max instead of 9 max.

I know i speak for a lot of ppl when im saying Saturdays with large Omanias and weekly's would be a dream for us and you would make more money that's a win win situation keep the weeklys 9 max and omanias 6 max.

With these changes you have a fantastic and playable schedule.


but big big thanks for the refresh! Just need a little tweaking the changes shows that you play very little or not play omaha tournaments and please let ut help you. ( no offence ) i
+ a lot
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 12:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrsport1015
i don't even know why i bother commenting in this thread anymore cause it seems obvious PS doesn't care in the least about our complaints and will do nothing to satisfy them. not one person has said they like the new pay table, yet here it remains. we are talking to a brick wall for the most part.
idk why everyone is panicking and writing things like this. while there's still much work to do and we're probably ****ed wrt payout structures, luke has been pretty responsive itt and has already implemented some changes because of feedback given. I really hope micros & mixed games are getting another overhaul, while I don't play too many of them it seems like the changes are terrible.

let's wait for monday when hopefully the terrible structures are gone and go from there. the schedule in itself looks pretty amazing to me, especially euro mornings have a lot of added value (as long as structures get changed). a big 11$ at 09:00 cet? hell **** yeah, actually gets me pumped getting up super early on sunday mornings
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 12:32 PM
That big 11 you are talking about is now just a random $11 wearing the big 11 mask as disguise.
You are no longer getting a nice structure and a good pay day compared to the big 11's we all loved in years gone by.

No longer something to look forward too.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 12:40 PM
I've been a 2+2 member for as long as I can remember and have been playing on pokerstars for 12 years, achieving supernova the last 8 years or so while playing professionally.

Throughout the years I had the pleasure to witness a Isai Scheinberg ran Pokerstars grow by building a tight relashionship with the poker community, professionals and amateurs. I watched this company be on the forefront of security at a time where no one cared about it, push international tournaments in places you would never expect, all of this while maintaining a certain gold standard. People had brand loyalty towards PS because of this, even if more competitive bonuses or loyalty programs were out there, people gravitated towards them because they left like they cared about the poker community, where other sites were more focused on sportsbetting or casino games.

I understand that Isai isn't calling the shots anymore, and as much as it pains me to watch you guys destroy everything he built through short sighted self sabotage, I understand that this out of my power. All I ask is that you don't lie to us.

Don't come in here parading these "great changes", where every single change in the Amaya era has been masking some form of bottom line greed. Honestly its ****ing insulting to my intelligence. Sitting around watching you guys find new ways to regurgitate your bull**** and I have a hard time believing you guys can ACTUALLY believe that this is ever in the best interest of poker.


I'm now gonna fly to Montreal to play a garbage terribly ran WSOPc event instead of going to EPT Monaco

./endrant
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 12:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ONLYRAISEAA
idk why everyone is panicking and writing things like this. while there's still much work to do and we're probably ****ed wrt payout structures, luke has been pretty responsive itt and has already implemented some changes because of feedback given. I really hope micros & mixed games are getting another overhaul, while I don't play too many of them it seems like the changes are terrible.

let's wait for monday when hopefully the terrible structures are gone and go from there. the schedule in itself looks pretty amazing to me, especially euro mornings have a lot of added value (as long as structures get changed). a big 11$ at 09:00 cet? hell **** yeah, actually gets me pumped getting up super early on sunday mornings
responsive? he made 1 change to the bigs (which are still fkd) and has refused to comment on a litany of other issues people have. just cause things are fine for u doesn't make it so for others.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 12:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_bridler
That big 11 you are talking about is now just a random $11 wearing the big 11 mask as disguise.
You are no longer getting a nice structure and a good pay day compared to the big 11's we all loved in years gone by.

No longer something to look forward too.
Take a deep breath, the schedule has not even been out a week yet. It will all be okay.


In all seriousness though, its pretty awesome so many off peak MTTs are getting such huge prizepools. The big 11 starting at 9am GMT was obviously never going to be as big as the one starting right in the middle of peak time. I completely agree with structures though, but give Luke a chance.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote

      
m