Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
PokerStars MTT Thread PokerStars MTT Thread

04-27-2016 , 07:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by anzhei
07:30ET $2.20+R
08:00ET $11 8-10-12 min levels or $3.30 1R1A
09:15ET $2.20+R
09:30ET $5.50 10 min levels
10:00ET $3.30+R
10:15ET $4.40 8-max
10:30ET $11 8-max 8-10-12 min levels
13:00ET $5.50 8-10-12 min levels
14:30ET $8.80 10 min levels or $2.20+R
I like the 5k starting stack i the new mtts, it will be better if the blind levels are 10min. The structure in 6max KO's and the new psko is good and they are good for the game in general because they attract more fun players.
Pokerstars remove all of FO's from 18 to 24 CET ($2-$11) and that will increase the variance for regulars. It will be good if Pokerstars bring back at least some of these tournaments. On munday I don't think i played mtt with less than 2000 peaple .
I think these changes had to happen slower.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 07:40 AM
why have they stopped most of the 4max shootout sng sats to tons of mtts that I now can't play?
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 07:41 AM
Currently playing the $11 Mini Battle Royale (Early Edition) and this is a good structure. 10 min blinds leading to 12 after the first hour of play. This is what the Big's should be!
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 07:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by saxby93
Currently playing the $11 Mini Battle Royale (Early Edition) and this is a good structure. 10 min blinds leading to 12 after the first hour of play. This is what the Big's should be!
Wait until you get in the money. It's a sunday million structure with 12 minute blinds. I'll be shocked if the avg stack will be more than 20BB at the final table.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 07:57 AM
Hello, i used to play the sats 3x turbo in the schedule, also 2x and turbos. Anyone know why they remove this kind of sats?
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 07:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMakk
Wait until you get in the money. It's a sunday million structure with 12 minute blinds. I'll be shocked if the avg stack will be more than 20BB at the final table.
Oh really? I've never played the SM so haven't paid too much attention to the structure, whoops! If that's the case then yeah I can imagine it's going to get very shallow!

Just seems good in comparison to the new big's and PSKO structures I guess haha! Still struggling to get over how bad 7/8/9 minutes are!
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 08:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoGGz
I think the structures need adjusting and that there needs to be more tournaments in the $5-$10 level.
I have just opened up the Stars software and manually counted all the tournaments NL-Holdem up to 10hours ahead and these are the numbers:
2$-10$: 37 tournaments PLUS NUMEROUS timebombs;
11$-30$: 28 tournaments INCLUDING NUMEROUS 6Max TURBOS, PKOS (sometimes all together!)
31$-500$: 42 tournaments, most of them MUCH BETTER than any 11-30.
So you keep saying the up to 10$ range needs more tournaments is just nothing but A LIE! And I understand people who admonish you! If you keep saying lies aroung here, we will believe that you may be following some underhanded agenda.
So yeah. Put more tournaments in the 11$-30$ range with LESS 6MAX AND TURBO, spreaded around nicely around the timetable. THANK YOU!
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 08:11 AM
At least 50% of the tournaments needs to be 9max you really need to consult a reg or two here.

+1000000
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 08:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by farfa
At least 50% of the tournaments needs to be 9max you really need to consult a reg or two here.

+1000000
you mean for omaha games i presume ?

+1m

Last edited by sattla; 04-27-2016 at 08:43 AM.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 08:37 AM
Yeah it's kinda decent.

Fix Bigs/ST/Thrill structure tho/prizepool.
320 wednesday?
too many 6max/hypers.
7r 3x turbo and 55r could be huge, but just not worth too play with rake-increase
How did 109r turbo survive the cut?
We just cleaned the scheduele up a bit and now it's littered again with 22$ 3stack 4k$ ect ect.
But most of all fix Bigs/ST. Start with 5k ss and antes so great, but shame we have to make up that time when deep. Nobody who regs wanted that to go faster.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 08:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Top Pig
why have they stopped most of the 4max shootout sng sats to tons of mtts that I now can't play?
I think they still exist, they just don't show up properly on the software just now. I noticed they didn't show up when I filtered for sats teh other day int eh SnG tab but if I chose all they appears. I was only looking at the 0-$3 range though so it may be different higher up the buyins.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 09:00 AM
Have to say I'm amazed at the number of people who play micro stakes on here, as 95% of the discussions pertain to sub 10$ buy-in and none of them concern buy ins of 55, 109 or 215 (and bigger).

Never thought there would be that many players grinding the small ones !

The BIGS that play during European evenings, starting from say 7pm CET, pretty much all lasted 7 hours. Average stack upon reaching final table was, from the 3 I saw, around 35 BB.

Not THAT bad, although still a bit quick.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 09:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerStars Luke

We're taking your concerns about the structures seriously and I'll be making a separate post addressing them before the end of the week.
I think my biggest problems with the VLT's is that they don't reflect the various stages of tournaments. I made a comment that in the H55 yesterday, despite being on the final table, we were still considerably far away from reaching the level requirement for 6 mins. This is badly designed because it fails to utilise the purpose of VLT's.

I think if we can categorise tournaments having various phases of play into something like the following:

1. Initial stages - While not often significant to the outcome of the tournament, this is a phase that should provide players with a chance to provide players with an opportunity to play deep stack situations and across multiple streets. Suggested Level Times:
Bigs 8
BB 7
Hots 4

2. Early Middle - Pre flop all ins become more common as stacks fluctuate more than the early stages. Pots become more significant. Play across multiple streets is still important, but should often end with a player being eliminated from the tournament. This stage should end with the bubble being burst, thus preventing stalling issues.
Suggested Level Times:
Bigs 9
BB 8
Hots 5

3. Middle - Average stack usually falls as a result of the bubble effect. This phase should provide players a chance to build a stack up for the final few tables.
Suggested Level Times:
Bigs 10
BB 9
Hots 5

4. Late - This phase I consider to be the final 3 or even 2 tables depending on the field size. Pots have significant impacts on players expected value of the prize pool. Play should lengthen to ensure the game is not a crapshoot.
Suggested Level Times:
Bigs 12
BB 10
Hots 6

5. Finale - This phase I consider to be around the bubble of the final table downwards. Pots have extreme impact on players expected value. Like the previous phase, the goal here should be able to provide players with a chance to play poker and not be resigned to their only option being to shove pre flop and hope to run good. A healthy balance of both is important obviously.
Suggested Level Times:
Bigs 15
BB 12
Hots 6

A few notes on my reasons for why I selected different level times across the 3 brands.

Bigs should be the best structure - vanilla poker designed to play multiple streets and a long game experience.

Bounty Builders have knockout prizes thus reducing fold equity and causing the average stack to stay fairly healthy. Play doesn't need to be as slow the Bigs.

Hots are obviously designed to be quick and fast paced. Great for players who want short sessions. The increase in level times later on should reduce the crapshoot factor, while not impacting too heavily on an increase in time due to the early levels being shorter.

Just my 2c's.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 09:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerStars Luke
Hey all,

There is a scheduled server restart tomorrow @ 07:00 ET. This means that the Early Editions of the Thursday Thrill will be cancelled. Next week’s Thursday Thrills will have the same guarantee as the Super Tuesdays.

Additionally,
  • All non-satellite Splash tournaments have been redeployed with a version of the old structure. This one was simply an oversight on my part and I apologize.
  • "Deep Stacks" tournaments have been modified to have 12-minute levels beginning at level 15 at all buy-in levels other than $2.20, where the change to 12-minute levels kicks in at level 31. This change is effective Monday.
  • So far over 140 guarantees have been adjusted for next week.

We're taking your concerns about the structures seriously and I'll be making a separate post addressing them before the end of the week.
Apologies accepted Pfiew thx.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 09:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sattla
Hey i want to start of by saying that i played your omaha schedule almost as good as every day for the last 2 years and i have actively been requesting tournaments/addons, which always has been for the better (like the rebuy sattys for 82/215 weeklys) and i actually believe that this new one is better in the way of tournaments round the clock so i'm very pleased with that.

I played the first day of the new schedule and took today of to reflect what i thought of it. I have also gathered most the info i get from most regs i speak with we are around 50 ppl in a skype channel and we all agree at some points which i will raise in the end of my post.

I actually got some of the things i wanted and 5cplo/plo8 psko is very nice even if the buyin is 11 and 5 card play very well i totally agree with that.

Also the small hypers are something i requested so pleased with it, i also dont mind the reentrys i more money in pool.

The Omanias i guess it just a question to adapt but i dont like that you took a level away it's fast enough 6 max.

320 is very nice addon i like it very much and all 3 formats get a tourney on i belived it was abit quick even for a 10k start but smashing prize pool like that i have not seen in a weeky since? god knows.. 139 buyins in total is just sick for a 320 plo8 since it's the least played omaha format and the 530 had like 60 tops only more when events ran. This is for sure a winner.


I also like the "Special Omanias" on Saturday that's going to be awsome to grind! im really looking forward to that. but i would really like to see some other options then 4 stack.

Also the special buyin on the mixed games is nice i really like that but you forgot about stud08/Razz which is sad whose should be added as well.

All these things are for sure very good addons.

But of course some of the changes made really made me wonder how much time you thought about this.

First of all Omaha is played 9 max as well as 6 max to make every single tournament 6 max is just a no brainer. Change tournaments doing very well as 9 max to 6 max is terrible for ppl trying to multi table. (so you make more money) I really dont enjoy playing ONLY six max with zero options to even get a single 9 handed. With the amount of turbos the schedule is not possible to play 6 handed simply takes way to much focus and plays to fast to "PLAY" omaha instead of just clicking. I know i will be cutting my max tables with at least half and i know more ppl will to(which makes you loose money) i truly hope and recommend you speak with some regs before making these huge change. Just like NLHE plo/plo/nlo8 is PLAYED 9 MAX its actually a fantastic format there is not a singel motivation to force 6max only this need to change fast. NLHE cash game is also dominated with 6 max but what would you think the NLHE community would say if you make every NLHE tournament 6 max with that motivation?

The splats tournaments are not totally unplayable 2 3 levels before addon a rebuy is not a blind, 6 max this is a satty format and its useless.
The addon is barely 3bb its like playing a super hyper hyper should be named "flip" not splat. Got to come back to old blind level.

The late 3+r plo with 2k rebuys is also gone same thing there just a big WHY.

And there is no slow plo8 rebuys at all the only one we had which was alot of ppl favorite tourney 11+r aka 5+r is gone but you keep the rebuy plo?
There are several way to make this tournament good just extend the rebuy period with 2 3 levels and make the 7.50 and put a 2k gtd. From your new rake rebuy perspective removing a rebuy tournament cant be a profit move. This was a tournament which we built our late shift on and i hope we can make it comeback. I even kept playing it even since i would rake over 1k extra on a year same with most regs.

My biggest concern is really the weekly's why would you take away the 55/82/215 where you made money, both from sattys and from the buyins. You dont need to have the gtds over 10k put them all on 8k if your loosing that much money that you haft to remove them?. Those got to comeback those where with out no doubt the highlight for us.This is just like killing us of and it does not make you more money most likely less? This is the biggest drawback for the 4 card community i think most ppl agree with that.

We really need to make some changes here to make this playable for profit:

1. Bring back weeklys 55/82/215 with all the sattys for them.

2. At least 50% of the tournaments needs to be 9max you really need to consult a reg or two here.

3. Rebuy tournaments for 320 3+r 3xturbo should be 3 4 for each format. (with the nlo8 NOT having the splat format but the plo8 format with antes)

4. Get rid of the NLO/NLO5 card tournaments make one PLO8 and one PLO this format is dead you first killed of the freeze outs (22/11) and kept the nlo 5card 2.20+r with a 500 gtd which had overlay just let the format die.

5. Bring back the level you removed in omanias it's fast enough 6 max.

6. 9max rebuy plo8 must comeback.

7. The late omania plo8 11 does not meet the GTD make it 16.50 and problem solved with 2k gtd.

8. Bring back the old payouts EU lunch omania use to be atleast 650 up top and 27 top at start of itm Now it payed 515 and first ITM 43 not a great.

Suggestions for Omanias on Saturdays is to make it the same format as the 320's to make more people use to it and since they are more expensive. Or a 2 stack wit 2x5k stack would also work you could also extend the late reg with 30 mins and after late reg have 12/15 min blinds to give it more value it's fast enough six max instead of 9 max.

I know i speak for a lot of ppl when im saying Saturdays with large Omanias and weekly's would be a dream for us and you would make more money that's a win win situation keep the weeklys 9 max and omanias 6 max.

With these changes you have a fantastic and playable schedule.


but big big thanks for the refresh! Just need a little tweaking the changes shows that you play very little or not play omaha tournaments and please let ut help you. ( no offence ) i

+100000000000000

It´s like changing the rules in Soccer from 11 man to 7 man teams in all the games? Thats just a no brainer!
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 09:34 AM
Well I appreciate the response.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 09:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregz41
I think my biggest problems with the VLT's is that they don't reflect the various stages of tournaments. I made a comment that in the H55 yesterday, despite being on the final table, we were still considerably far away from reaching the level requirement for 6 mins. This is badly designed because it fails to utilise the purpose of VLT's.
I don't even understand why we need a VLT structure at all. The same adjustments could by made by simply changing the degree in jump between the individual blind levels without even touching the level times. Just make slightly larger jumps early and then have it lessened throughout mid to late game.

The problem right now is the steeper blind levels jumps in late game, not just the inaccuracy on when the VLT kick in. They need to fix those jumps first or you will always have people stalling or taking advantage of them in some way.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 09:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregz41
I think my biggest problems with the VLT's is that they don't reflect the various stages of tournaments. I made a comment that in the H55 yesterday, despite being on the final table, we were still considerably far away from reaching the level requirement for 6 mins. This is badly designed because it fails to utilise the purpose of VLT's.

I think if we can categorise tournaments having various phases of play into something like the following:

1. Initial stages - While not often significant to the outcome of the tournament, this is a phase that should provide players with a chance to provide players with an opportunity to play deep stack situations and across multiple streets. Suggested Level Times:
Bigs 8
BB 7
Hots 4

2. Early Middle - Pre flop all ins become more common as stacks fluctuate more than the early stages. Pots become more significant. Play across multiple streets is still important, but should often end with a player being eliminated from the tournament. This stage should end with the bubble being burst, thus preventing stalling issues.
Suggested Level Times:
Bigs 9
BB 8
Hots 5

3. Middle - Average stack usually falls as a result of the bubble effect. This phase should provide players a chance to build a stack up for the final few tables.
Suggested Level Times:
Bigs 10
BB 9
Hots 5

4. Late - This phase I consider to be the final 3 or even 2 tables depending on the field size. Pots have significant impacts on players expected value of the prize pool. Play should lengthen to ensure the game is not a crapshoot.
Suggested Level Times:
Bigs 12
BB 10
Hots 6

5. Finale - This phase I consider to be around the bubble of the final table downwards. Pots have extreme impact on players expected value. Like the previous phase, the goal here should be able to provide players with a chance to play poker and not be resigned to their only option being to shove pre flop and hope to run good. A healthy balance of both is important obviously.
Suggested Level Times:
Bigs 15
BB 12
Hots 6

A few notes on my reasons for why I selected different level times across the 3 brands.

Bigs should be the best structure - vanilla poker designed to play multiple streets and a long game experience.

Bounty Builders have knockout prizes thus reducing fold equity and causing the average stack to stay fairly healthy. Play doesn't need to be as slow the Bigs.

Hots are obviously designed to be quick and fast paced. Great for players who want short sessions. The increase in level times later on should reduce the crapshoot factor, while not impacting too heavily on an increase in time due to the early levels being shorter.

Just my 2c's.
this is what perfect structure for all the majors should look like
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 09:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaggalo1231
this is what perfect structure for all the majors should look like
Depends...if blind change after 10 levels and after that after 12 levels its not ok, its similar with what we have now, u reach the 10 min level when u reach F2T
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 10:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerStars Luke

We're taking your concerns about the structures seriously and I'll be making a separate post addressing them before the end of the week.
Hello Luke,

I hope you don't forget about us Omaha / Omaha H/L players when you get round to addressing the numerous concerns about the new schedule.

There are many players both reg and rec alike that prefer playing 9 handed over 6 handed and I think it would be unanimously agreed that there should be some full ring mtts on the schedule.

Omaha H/L is my main game and there are now zero full ring mtts in the new schedule, which seems crazy to me considering prior to the changes the majority of O8 mtts were full ring.

I really hope you can sort this out so we have something like a 50/50 spilt of full ring and short handed, turbo and non turbo mtts to choose from.

Last edited by Spudhead; 04-27-2016 at 10:06 AM. Reason: Omaha players matter too :)
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 10:13 AM
And omaha8 honeymoon is over.... 16.5$ 2.5k guaranteed had 325$ overlay in 3rd day with that schedule...

That 6max is just NOT working.. Plz STOP KILLIN omaha8

Just leave 4$ omania to 6max and otherwise old scheduled 9max back

Last edited by DickColt; 04-27-2016 at 10:29 AM.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 10:41 AM
I echo the thoughts of most of the other Omaha Hi Lo regs, this 6 max business on all games is a torturious idea. The games have devolved into a flipfest even worse than before.

Please make atleast 50% and the omanias 9 max again. I play for fun and an i'm old man, I can now only play 1-2 games at once due to the extra concentration required to chase every chip at the 6 max table. I will quit O8 completely and focus on horse and micro buyins now instead. I am not interested in being a rat on a 6 max wheel.

Same for courchevel high and hi lo, 5 card omaha, all ruined.

The structure in the splash games was insanely bad after addon.

The structure seems ok, the schedule is ok for low stake player such as myself but the 6max has ruined any enjoyment i had playing 4 tables at once, you'll be getting half the rake u got from me and I go back to 2.20, 1.10c and the daily $27 horse.

If I play 6 max 08 im only interested in playing hypers so the 3.30 KO hypers are a welcome addition.

I played yesterday all 6 max and every game was just a moronic shove fest.

Thanks for ruining any enjoyment I had playing this game.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 10:44 AM
just a quick feedback regarding the emptiness of the lowstakes schedule

i play most 3-11$ tournies on the bigger sites and as of 4.40 pm CET i have 0 Stars.eu tables open! Purely due to available volume and i do not think i ever had this during a full session in about 8 or so years of grinding!

not intended and fixed soon i hope
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 10:55 AM
Oh yeah and one last thing, the payout structure is a ****ing nightmare jesus christ
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote
04-27-2016 , 10:55 AM
really. PS must really believe we are all stupid and wouldnt see those bad changes since they are "hidden". not only we are seeying, but also their competion.

looks like they didint learned anything with fulltilt about how fast they can kill a business.
so good luck with finding a new job soon doing this horrific job.
PokerStars MTT Thread Quote

      
m