Quote:
Originally Posted by jdawg91
Any response to these 2 posts Bryan? I'm trying to be more constructive in my posts itt lately so semi annoying when I get ignored. Actually legit curious on the figure in my first quoted post because I might just be wrong
I have to repeat myself on this one from time to time: I don't ignore any posts. I don't answer every post... doing so would be a full-time job in and of itself, and my main job as it applies to 2p2 is interacting with the forum in the process of building great tournaments, both in the regular schedule and in our championship series... but I read every single one, and usually jot a note or two down from the ones which contain considerable content. For example, from one of the posts you quote above, there is a note on my list of pending items:
"19. examine & consider fixing the Sunday Kickoff structure (faster than the Bigger $109? Really?)"
As for your other question, I'll take a look at that right now, since you've asked. As I mentioned, in the guarantee evaluation performed on 25 November 2014, 20 guarantees were raised. Of those 20, 10 were branded (painted
red and in Tourney/Special) and 10 were regular tournaments with guarantees. Interesting... it wasn't planned to be an even split, but that's how it came out. I'll also note here that guarantee evaluations are carried out all the time, and that we're happy to raise guarantees whenever it's feasible to do so. The 'build it and they'll come' philosophy on guarantees does not work, it's not sustainable... we know that... but when a tournament's performance indicates that it's time for the guarantee to go up, we're more than happy to raise it.
Thank you as always for participating and providing feedback.