Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** *** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread ***

04-19-2012 , 02:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by XoSkeleton
t1000 in 45s gogogo

I don't think it could ever be a bad idea.
+1
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
04-19-2012 , 02:34 PM
T1000. And please a response re: a deal button in 180s and SNG leaderboards.
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
04-19-2012 , 03:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChAAnt JC
deal button in 180s
yeah this would be nice, obv for regs to split cuz its too much variance, wouldnt split with fish ldo
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
04-19-2012 , 04:01 PM
Steve you are taking way too long over the whole Leaderboard thing. Pull your fingers out at HQ and leave people's doomswitches alone! (namely mine).
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
04-20-2012 , 04:21 AM
In case someone missed how the meetings went with stars and 2p2 reps:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/28...ssion-1195589/
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
04-20-2012 , 07:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PS Walmsley
We're still discussing the 1000 level in 45-mans. I know this has been a popular idea in the thread but any structure changes have to be considered carefully. On this subject, is there anyone ITT that thinks this is a bad idea?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mckrogh
Can u please comment on the suggested bb1000 level in 45man?
Quote:
Originally Posted by nujabes
thisthis, antes at 50/100 would be the nuts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chilin_dude
I completely agree with adding t1k to 45s. Anything to slow the structure a little bit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starzz
Wouldn't it be great if Stars actually employed someone with big SnG experience. Why is anyone ever gong to object to the bb1k addition? Listen to us who are playing them every single day. There is no risk of anything whatsoever.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Wolfe
I dont understand what possible downsides there are to having a bb1000 level in the 45mans?
Quote:
Originally Posted by set4vegas
+1 to adding the 1000 level in 45s
and ty for the 3.50 reg speeds to run 24/7
Quote:
Originally Posted by XoSkeleton
t1000 in 45s gogogo
I don't think it could ever be a bad idea.
Quote:
Originally Posted by theMBK
+1
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChAAnt JC
T1000. And please a response re: a deal button in 180s and SNG leaderboards.
Steve, since u ask about the 1000bb level, there has only been positive comments about adding it to 45man. Not a single negative comment!

Would u implement this bb1000 level in 45man soon please?

Last edited by mckrogh; 04-20-2012 at 07:49 AM. Reason: One time :)
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
04-20-2012 , 08:40 AM
+1 to t1000 in 45s.
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
04-20-2012 , 08:51 AM
I hate t1000 in 45s.

Since I got a job and pokerstars made them slower I have stopped playing completely. There really is no MTTSNG offering for my taste. Having ~10 tournaments done in an hour would be a perfect kind of entertainment after work.

Not sure how long ZOOM tournaments will last but I hope they will at least provide faster action. Right now MTTSNG offerings seem too boring and a waste of my time.
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
04-20-2012 , 03:08 PM
^ Then play hyper turbos.
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
04-20-2012 , 08:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ivar_m
I hate t1000 in 45s.

Since I got a job and pokerstars made them slower I have stopped playing completely. There really is no MTTSNG offering for my taste. Having ~10 tournaments done in an hour would be a perfect kind of entertainment after work.

Not sure how long ZOOM tournaments will last but I hope they will at least provide faster action. Right now MTTSNG offerings seem too boring and a waste of my time.
I wanted to quote this because this is exactly what I have been saying and now you have a rec player coming in and saying the same thing. Make it easier for people to play 10 tournaments in an hour after work.

Here are some questions I have for ivar:

Turbo Ten at Ten: Are you an MTT player? If they had a turbo MTT every 10 minutes with late registration for 30 minutes, would you play it, seeing as how you can jump into a few games right away? Did you ever play on FTP, and if so, were you a fan of "On Demand" tourneys?

MTTSNG lack of offerings: Can you elaborate on why MTTSNG offerings are too boring? Is it because the early levels are too slow with everyone tank folding? Etc.

MTTSNG blind structure: On that same note -- right now, the current blind structure is bb20,bb30,bb50,bb100,bb150,bb200,bb250,bb300. Would you prefer that it changed, eg. to bb30,bb40,bb60,bb80,bb120,bb160,b200,bb300 ? Or maybe just
bb30,bb40,bb60,bb100,bb150,b200,bb250,bb300 ?

Last edited by Alex Wice; 04-20-2012 at 08:28 PM.
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
04-20-2012 , 08:41 PM
Being able to insta jump into a game doesn't make 10 tournies end in one hour! That's a ridiculous request and the extreme minority, not your average rec player's wishes at all.
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
04-20-2012 , 09:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Wice
I wanted to quote this because this is exactly what I have been saying and now you have a rec player coming in and saying the same thing. Make it easier for people to play 10 tournaments in an hour after work.

Here are some questions I have for ivar:

Turbo Ten at Ten: Are you an MTT player? If they had a turbo MTT every 10 minutes with late registration for 30 minutes, would you play it, seeing as how you can jump into a few games right away? Did you ever play on FTP, and if so, were you a fan of "On Demand" tourneys?

MTTSNG lack of offerings: Can you elaborate on why MTTSNG offerings are too boring? Is it because the early levels are too slow with everyone tank folding? Etc.

MTTSNG blind structure: On that same note -- right now, the current blind structure is bb20,bb30,bb50,bb100,bb150,bb200,bb250,bb300. Would you prefer that it changed, eg. to bb30,bb40,bb60,bb80,bb120,bb160,b200,bb300 ? Or maybe just
bb30,bb40,bb60,bb100,bb150,b200,bb250,bb300 ?
On demand tournaments were great because late registrants are always recreational players (since all the regs are already in the game). Everyone wins - recreational players have small low/midstakes tournaments to play when they want and regs get the fields topped up with losing players.
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
04-20-2012 , 09:23 PM
referring to reg speed 45s i like the idea of more levels earlier maybe 20 30 40 60 80 and introducing antes at 100. No antes at the 100 150 and 200 level (first 200 level im talking about) seems silly. It almost feels like no incentive to put my chips in the middle without antes in the middle when i have 10 -15 big blinds.
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
04-20-2012 , 10:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FDSaussure
On demand tournaments were great because late registrants are always recreational players (since all the regs are already in the game). Everyone wins - recreational players have small low/midstakes tournaments to play when they want and regs get the fields topped up with losing players.
agree
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
04-21-2012 , 04:56 AM
6-max mtt sngs... edit: TURBO !1 time please.. would be a huge success, make them zoom and u have a golden goose
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
04-22-2012 , 08:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FDSaussure
On demand tournaments were great because late registrants are always recreational players (since all the regs are already in the game). Everyone wins - recreational players have small low/midstakes tournaments to play when they want and regs get the fields topped up with losing players.
Zoom On Demand Tournies Plz!
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
04-23-2012 , 12:05 AM
1. That players can make a deal by their own. Like you can see on PartyPoker and in the past on FT. It's pretty annoying to get a mod and wait and wait etc.
2. More 180 turbo's and not only on sunday.
3. More sattelites for the smaller fields like the $109 HORSE
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
04-23-2012 , 04:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PS Walmsley
Here are links to a couple of posts from earlier in the thread. The first addresses the question of liquidity in general and the second addresses the specific question of higher buy-in 180 regular speed SNGs.

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...8&postcount=65

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...postcount=166l
Quote:
Originally Posted by furo
you forget that reg speed 180s never showed up in the main lobby, only in the SnG subsection.
this is one reason 11/180s (and higher) ran alot less often than turbo 180s that had been (and are still) shown in the main lobby.

earlier there where more non turbo 90s >$15 as well, and knockouts.... where are these tournaments?

i feel that ~$15/180s should be added (if not permanent, at least on weekends) and that everyone would benefit from it. non turbo 180s dont share the same playerpool with 180 turbos and lower, alot of the MTT players look for chances to fill tables up/get in volume when playing reg speed MTTs.
and yea currently the only way to increase volume is playing MTTs on the other pokersides along with the MTTs on stars.

you have 10k+/15k+ fields every day in MTTs. why should these players not want to play 180s? why is there no playerbase for these tournaments????
put them in the mainlobby, make them red , and profit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeamTrousers
I'm not doubting you when you say that there is a lack of liquidity at the moment, but then surely the follow-up question should be WHY is there apparently insufficient liquidity?

With a site as big as pokerstars, even if you can't really support a regspeed in the region of $20, there really should be enough people online, at least during peak hours, such that 180 of them are willing to pony up around $10 within, say, ten or fifteen minutes of each other, to get a few of these games going. After all, you get 9,000+ people playing the Big $11 every day, and a further 4,000+ playing the Hot $11.

As furo says, I think that visibility is a big issue here — now that these big tournaments have drawn those $11 players online, enough of them would play an $11/180 if they saw it; I'm sure many of those who get bad beat or coolered in the early stages would take another go at something if they thought it would start soon.

I understand that you are only allocated a certain number of spots for SNGs under the MTT tab, but under Tourney>Regular>All you have a bunch of great 180s, and somewhat incongruously, sitting next to them you have those absurd 2cent buyin 990man hyperturbos. Now, I'm sure they're great fun, but they don't rake you anything at all, and they still take ten minutes to fill, because other than degens and bustos, who the hell wants to flip coins for an hour and still only get $4.40 to show for such absurd rungood at the end of it all? Frankly, it seems silly that this has been chosen for that slot, over a "proper" MTT SNG.

If you removed this 2c flipathon from Tourney>Regular>All, and swapped it for, say, an $11/180, the increased visibility would surely go a long way to creating the liquidity you need for these to take off. We as players get a nice tournament which we want, and you would finally start to get some rake from this presumably valuable seventh and final spot you've been granted in what must surely be premium real estate at the top of the MTT lobby. I don't see how they would interfere with either the $8 or $15 turbos, nor should they really interfere with the $3.50r either.

If you don't want them there 24 hours a day then do something similar to what you've done with the Sunday-only 60/180s; spawn them during peak hours only. They could spawn every day between, say, 10am and midnight server time, and if the last one of the night didn't fill by, say, 1am server time, then you can just cancel it and return monies.


furo, I don't think the answer is making them red....

TT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curious George
If you arent going to add higher rebuy 180s or regspeed 180s, at least put the 7r 90mans in the main lobby instead of the micro hyperturb.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pagasses...
At least one more 180 reg speed. We have to be playing always the same ****, every single day.... the turbo regs have plenty of choice, we are the dogs....this is not the way you should treat your clients...

updates?
or do you plan on keeping $4 the highest non turbo SnG BI?
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
04-23-2012 , 06:14 AM
I'm late to the thread, but would like add my agreement to the point that AWice made about Payout structure. I think having one or two pay jumps going from 18-10 would be great.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Wice


5: Payout Structure

The payout structure for 180s is pretty good. Here it is:
FT: 30%, 20%, 11.9%, 8.0%, 6.5%, 5.0%, 3.5%, 2.6%, 1.7%
Second Table: 1.2%=10th=18th.

However it could be improved. First I feel that 10th and 18th being the same is very outdated. I understand this was done to have more money at the top but overall it wasn't the best decision.

Here is the payout structure I would consider that I think is most fair:

16th=18th = 1%
13th=15th = 1.5%
12th=10th = 2%
9th = 2.5%
8th = 3%
7th = 3.75%
6th = 4.75%
5th = 6%
4th = 7.5%
3rd = 10%
2nd = 19%
1st = 30%

To compare, here is a typical $15/180 with both payouts in $:\
(Reason 1st is different is I am using the stars algorithm which puts unused pennies into 1st place.)
PlaceOld PayoutNew Payout
1743.64743.67
2495.72470.93
3294.95247.86
4198.28185.89
5161.1148.71
6123.93117.73
786.7592.94
864.4474.35
942.1361.96
1029.7449.57
1129.7449.57
1229.7449.57
1329.7437.17
1429.7437.17
1529.7437.17
1629.7424.78
1729.7424.78
1829.7424.78

I think this is the absolute best payout structure for 180s.
I'd also like another blind level before 50/100 in the 180s. I think the current structure just ends up in push/fold slightly too quickly.

Thanks
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
04-23-2012 , 07:03 AM
Ya I think its become clear now that there is definitely a direction in both SNGs and MTTSNGs that more mid game levels are desired before push folding.

What do people think about this blind structure:

LevelOldNew
12030
23040
35060
410080
5150120
6200160
7250200
8300300
9400400
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
04-23-2012 , 08:00 AM
Steve, can u please say if the 1000bb level is gonna be implemented or not to the 45man?

So far theres been so many positives comments about adding it. And only 1 negative.

Can u please just let us know wether or not this is going to happen?

We have been waiting patiently for a long time now.

Thank you.
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
04-23-2012 , 10:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Wice
Ya I think its become clear now that there is definitely a direction in both SNGs and MTTSNGs that more mid game levels are desired before push folding.

What do people think about this blind structure:

LevelOldNew
12030
23040
35060
410080
5150120
6200160
7250200
8300300
9400400
Antes at 120? if so, yespls!

Quote:
Originally Posted by mckrogh
Steve, can u please say if the 1000bb level is gonna be implemented or not to the 45man?

So far theres been so many positives comments about adding it. And only 1 negative.

Can u please just let us know wether or not this is going to happen?

We have been waiting patiently for a long time now.

Thank you.
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
04-23-2012 , 02:18 PM
I think a cool way to get fish to play more would be to freeze the client at least once a week for unlimited time.
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
04-23-2012 , 02:20 PM
60/180s running everyday now?
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote
04-23-2012 , 02:27 PM
Nope, just a leftover from sunday.
*** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread *** Quote

      
m