Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
***Official August 2010 [censored] Thread*** ***Official August 2010 [censored] Thread***

08-20-2010 , 04:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_snail03
wow haven't had any income since around May, need to start grinding asap.
slow and steady wins the race
***Official August 2010 [censored] Thread*** Quote
08-20-2010 , 04:44 PM
Just had someone call the flop and fold turn with 4bb on ub. I love this place.
***Official August 2010 [censored] Thread*** Quote
08-20-2010 , 04:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kleath
slow and steady wins the race
Did I do good champ?


Full Tilt Poker $23,500 Guarantee (Rebuy) No Limit Hold'em Tournament - t10/t20 Blinds - 8 players
The Official 2+2 Hand Converter Powered By DeucesCracked.com

mordi20 (UTG+1): t3000 150 BBs
jyrzi1004 (MP1): t6020 301 BBs
BgsaPnaples (MP2): t2970 148.50 BBs
Pghfan987 (CO): t2970 148.50 BBs
Treadin Dank (BTN): t3040 152 BBs
phatchoy888 (SB): t2980 149 BBs
Hero (BB): t3000 150 BBs
petegotaplan (UTG): t4520 226 BBs

Pre Flop: (t30) Hero is BB with A 2
4 folds, Pghfan987 raises to t60, 2 folds, Hero raises to t3000 all in, Pghfan987 calls t2910 all in

Flop: (t5950) 4 J J

Turn: (t5950) 2

River: (t5950) 6

Final Pot: t5950
Pghfan987 shows K A (a pair of Jacks)
Hero shows A 2 (two pair, Jacks and Twos)
Hero wins t5950
***Official August 2010 [censored] Thread*** Quote
08-20-2010 , 05:01 PM
can someone give me the UB monnies for my ftp..need around 500
***Official August 2010 [censored] Thread*** Quote
08-20-2010 , 05:10 PM
i still need stars money, i'll take anything from 500-5k for my FTP pls
***Official August 2010 [censored] Thread*** Quote
08-20-2010 , 05:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suchsickaments
can someone give me the UB monnies for my ftp..need around 500
Depending on outcome of what I am playing now. I can probably do that.. or atleast give you something.
***Official August 2010 [censored] Thread*** Quote
08-20-2010 , 05:14 PM
PokerStars Game #48433181947: Tournament #326010595, $50+$5 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level VII (125/250) - 2010/08/20 17:05:43 ET
Table '326010595 10' 9-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: TakenItEasy2 (4134 in chips)
Seat 2: bentinck113 (3990 in chips)
Seat 3: rsca03 (3365 in chips)
Seat 4: Nemoqwe88 (18125 in chips)
Seat 5: GeoffRas22 (8425 in chips)
Seat 6: p3rc4 (15275 in chips)
Seat 7: devinr12 (13310 in chips)
Seat 8: Treadinwater (7375 in chips)
Seat 9: IKnewwwIt (6105 in chips)
TakenItEasy2: posts the ante 25
bentinck113: posts the ante 25
rsca03: posts the ante 25
Nemoqwe88: posts the ante 25
GeoffRas22: posts the ante 25
p3rc4: posts the ante 25
devinr12: posts the ante 25
Treadinwater: posts the ante 25
IKnewwwIt: posts the ante 25
bentinck113: posts small blind 125
rsca03: posts big blind 250
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to GeoffRas22 [Js Kc]
Nemoqwe88: folds
GeoffRas22: raises 275 to 525
p3rc4: calls 525
devinr12: folds
Treadinwater: folds
IKnewwwIt: folds
TakenItEasy2: folds
bentinck113: calls 400
rsca03: folds
*** FLOP *** [5h Th Ts]
bentinck113: checks
GeoffRas22: bets 880
p3rc4: raises 880 to 1760
bentinck113: folds
GeoffRas22: calls 880
*** TURN *** [5h Th Ts] [3c]
GeoffRas22: checks
p3rc4: bets 1765
GeoffRas22: raises 4350 to 6115 and is all-in
p3rc4: folds
Uncalled bet (4350) returned to GeoffRas22
GeoffRas22 collected 9100 from pot
GeoffRas22: doesn't show hand

p3rc4 said, "=("
p3rc4 said, "why didnt u shove flop?"
p3rc4 said, "w KJhh"
p3rc4 said, "sick line"
GeoffRas22 said, "nah just had KJo"
GeoffRas22 said, "no hearts"
GeoffRas22 said, "get a clue starring lindsay lohan"

Last edited by GeoffRas22; 08-20-2010 at 05:15 PM. Reason: just call me bjorn
***Official August 2010 [censored] Thread*** Quote
08-20-2010 , 07:39 PM
I really feel like the Sorel thread should be reopened considering who is implicated.
***Official August 2010 [censored] Thread*** Quote
08-20-2010 , 07:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mement_mori
I really feel like the Sorel thread should be reopened considering who is implicated.
yeah it honestly read to me like 2 pros conspiring to cheat in a way I've always been suspicious of. Seemed genuine, not like a hoax imo. at least let op cite his sources?
***Official August 2010 [censored] Thread*** Quote
08-20-2010 , 07:44 PM
I didn't see it. But you can't let people make serious accusations without some sort of proof. In fact the thread title should be removed. IMO.
***Official August 2010 [censored] Thread*** Quote
08-20-2010 , 07:44 PM
no, it shouldnt. 1 post randoms shouldnt be able to just fabricate whatever they want, make a sensational post with absolutely no proof and expect that to be ok. ill be happy to reopen the thread when im given ANY proof its anything other than an exciting story someone decided to create.
***Official August 2010 [censored] Thread*** Quote
08-20-2010 , 07:47 PM
I mean Matt, that would be a seriously absurd fabrication and they'd have to know a ton of information about both people to even begin something like that...
***Official August 2010 [censored] Thread*** Quote
08-20-2010 , 07:48 PM
At least needs some evidence of being kosher. Rather than random text, I mean where on earth would he have got that from?
***Official August 2010 [censored] Thread*** Quote
08-20-2010 , 07:48 PM
Fair enough I respect that decision. Waxonchris since you don't have enough posts for me to pm you and the thread was locked please email me the chat at mickeydp@gmail.com if you read this thanks.

Also as JP has said it implicates two people it's my impression done very shady things in the past from what I know and furthermore smeared the names of cdbr, Intervention and someone else I didn't know I feel like they should have a chance to deny it if nothing else so it's on print. I dont know how he obtained but it seemed very real to me.

Last edited by mement_mori; 08-20-2010 at 07:55 PM.
***Official August 2010 [censored] Thread*** Quote
08-20-2010 , 07:51 PM
Thorladen's been involved in very shady things in the past?
***Official August 2010 [censored] Thread*** Quote
08-20-2010 , 07:51 PM
I agree, it DOES seems real, but innocent until proven otherwise and all that.

His 1 post obv means he doesn't want his identity revealed so doubt he explains it's origins
***Official August 2010 [censored] Thread*** Quote
08-20-2010 , 07:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd Terry
Thorladen's been involved in very shady things in the past?
I am not 100% sure but I thought he was pretty much the first guy who had multiple people playing on one account back when he bet a lot of money on a plb race but I didnt play back then so maybe im wrong.
***Official August 2010 [censored] Thread*** Quote
08-20-2010 , 07:53 PM
ive never heard of thor being shady. maybe im forgetting something. regardless, i posted in the thread again just giving op a way to offer some proof if he has any. i definitely am not trying to cover anything up, i dont know either of the players involved. i just know its 2p2's policy, and a pretty good policy in general, to not let things like that be posted by people with no credibility or proof (or really even an attempt at either of these things).
***Official August 2010 [censored] Thread*** Quote
08-20-2010 , 07:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mement_mori
I am not 100% sure but I thought he was pretty much the first guy who had multiple people playing on one account back when he bet a lot of money on a plb race but I didnt play back then so maybe im wrong.
thought this was exclusive
***Official August 2010 [censored] Thread*** Quote
08-20-2010 , 07:56 PM
yea Thorladen defended JJ/Multiaccounting/said it was no big deal when he was first caught (along with tons of people, myself included), and possibly was involved in some multiaccounting with the gigabet tlb bet - memory is fuzzy on that part, but i know there was a team of players playing on one account to beat gigabet, i think he was involved. this was before zeejustin/jj yeras though, possibly even before Exclusive.
***Official August 2010 [censored] Thread*** Quote
08-20-2010 , 08:03 PM
for anyone who didnt read it and want to pm me for link
***Official August 2010 [censored] Thread*** Quote
08-20-2010 , 08:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exitonly
yea Thorladen defended JJ/Multiaccounting/said it was no big deal when he was first caught (along with tons of people, myself included), and possibly was involved in some multiaccounting with the gigabet tlb bet - memory is fuzzy on that part, but i know there was a team of players playing on one account to beat gigabet, i think he was involved. this was before zeejustin/jj yeras though, possibly even before Exclusive.
ozzy bet 100k that gigabet would win the tlb for that month, thorladen, exclusive, and others (i know some, but not sure that was all public knowledge at the time) accepted the bet and played an account 24 hrs to try and win the tlb or take as many tlb poins from gigabet as they could. jj prodigy (not involved in the side bet at all) ended up winning the tlb that month anyways, so thor & co won the bet.

this was highly publicized and within the terms of the bet. the sites did nothing about it then b/c no one thought it was a big deal

never heard the words 'thorladen' and 'shady' in the same sentence and i've been around for awhile fwiw
***Official August 2010 [censored] Thread*** Quote
08-20-2010 , 08:21 PM
wow

i find it really hard to believe some1 made that up- but if they did well than id imagine the ppl they trust arent as trustworthy as they think
***Official August 2010 [censored] Thread*** Quote
08-20-2010 , 08:23 PM
I've now read the currently deleted alleged conversation. I think that the amount of detail contained in it makes it very unlikely to be fabricated. As a result, I think it should be posted.

This is something I wrote with respect to a different post that got deleted on 2p2, it's equally applicable here:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd Terry
I've now read the deleted viffer post (I am not referring to its specific contents or where I saw it in this post). I think it should be allowed to be posted because it contains enough detail as to be highly likely to have come from an inside source.

A legal analogy that comes to mind is when information is sufficient to justify issuance of a search warrant. The police often receive anonymous tips, which are presumed to be unreliable. One way they can be deemed reliable is though "self-verifying detail" -- where enough detail is set forth that a reasonable inference can be drawn that it wasn't made up. I think the email at issue, at least in substantial part, meets that standard.
***Official August 2010 [censored] Thread*** Quote
08-20-2010 , 08:27 PM
i thought it was pretty detailed for a fake too, but wtf at sorel being so surprised/impressed/excited by basic remote desktop ****?
***Official August 2010 [censored] Thread*** Quote

      
m