***OFFICIAL 180-man Regs Thread NSFW***
10-16-2012
, 05:28 PM
10-16-2012
, 09:56 PM
10-17-2012
, 01:47 AM
10-17-2012
, 11:04 AM
10-17-2012
, 04:41 PM
10-18-2012
, 01:52 AM
10-18-2012
, 01:50 PM
10-20-2012
, 09:00 AM
10-22-2012
, 12:48 PM
Quote:
Hello all,
During the player meetings, there was a suggestion of paying the top 15% of players in all 45+ tournaments. This would result in the following payout structure:
I am aware that there has been suggestions to reduce the 90 man payouts to the final table, but we haven’t really seen a huge turnout in favour of this suggestion. Paying 13 players instead of 12 makes sense since the bubble will be played with 7 players at each table, something that seems fairer than tables of 6 and 7 as is the case now.
So we would like to have your input on this proposal, and then we will make a decision in the near future on whether or not to move forward on this.
Thanks,
Baard
During the player meetings, there was a suggestion of paying the top 15% of players in all 45+ tournaments. This would result in the following payout structure:
I am aware that there has been suggestions to reduce the 90 man payouts to the final table, but we haven’t really seen a huge turnout in favour of this suggestion. Paying 13 players instead of 12 makes sense since the bubble will be played with 7 players at each table, something that seems fairer than tables of 6 and 7 as is the case now.
So we would like to have your input on this proposal, and then we will make a decision in the near future on whether or not to move forward on this.
Thanks,
Baard
only FT paid would be a better direction imo
.maybe not bad to attract more fish as long as they don't cut too hard into the top 3 payouts (high payouts attract fish, + gets harder to mainain decent ROI when those drop)
10-22-2012
, 02:34 PM
10-22-2012
, 09:42 PM
10-22-2012
, 10:30 PM
10-22-2012
, 11:41 PM