Quote:
Originally Posted by Synth
So min-raising is not very good in your opinion but raising .5x more is just right? Lol.
No villain will fold anymore often to a 2.5x BB raise than to a 2x BB raise.
Do you min-raise in the first level of a tournament? I imagine you don't because I don't know many regs that do. Why is that? Do you think all the people that played the $10,300 high roller on stars during WCOOP were a bunch of fish because the majority of them were NOT min-raising even in the later parts of the tournament and the FT?
I think (and let me re-iterate that I THINK, just like many of you THINK the opposite, you offer no proof to the contrary and until you do it's a subjective opinion in this regard not some sort of proven theory. Can you emphatically tell me that a different raise sizing based on chip stack dynamics does not make a difference? Can you tell me that table dynamics do not change at all based on table stack sizes?) it's a leak to not vary your raise size from table to table based on the chip dynamic of the table. Let me clearly specify that I DO NOT mean varying your raise sizes because of hands or whatever, I still feel it needs to be a constant raise sizing.
I don't know what kind of MTTs you guys are playing, but last time I checked the MTTs I'm playing, people react differently to ALL of our actions, including sizing. You can't just auto-pilot everything you do and expect to win.
Also in regards to actual hand, yea never folding KT there on the HJ with stack sizes. Would probably advocate a slightly higher raise like 2.5x given the stacks, but of course this is dependent on the actual actions of the table. TBH I kind of just want to fold the flop to that strong of a donk lead readless. Turn is without question a fold, I can't imagine there's anything you beat here.