Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Equilab is wrong... Equilab is wrong...

12-11-2018 , 07:20 AM
HI there..

Im trying to find the range...

For example top 10% range dosent show KJo but its show QTs where
KJo vs QTs its 58% to 41%. Why?? can samone explain this to me please...
Equilab is wrong... Quote
12-11-2018 , 08:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wpb999
HI there..

Im trying to find the range...

For example top 10% range dosent show KJo but its show QTs where
KJo vs QTs its 58% to 41%. Why QTs its higher in the range?? can samone explain this to me please...
Equilab is wrong... Quote
12-11-2018 , 09:12 AM
Hand vs hand has little to do with range rankings. For example, 22 has an advantage head to head over AKo, 53% to 47%. Yet, AKo is generally in the top 5% range with most ranking systems while 22 is only in the 60% range or so. Actual values depend on what criterion is used for the range ranking. Poker Stove for example developed ranges by comparing how each hand fares against 3 random hands.
Equilab is wrong... Quote
12-11-2018 , 10:51 AM
Thank You very much for Your answer. So what I should learn. For examle ICM shows me on 6max shove pre for MP3 is 12,2%: 44+ A9s+ A5s AJo+ KTs+ KQo QTs+ JTs. Should I showe 44+ and everting above that in range or 44+ and every other hand with higher equity??
Please help me, I will send You few bucks on Poker Stars in return. Thanks
Equilab is wrong... Quote
12-18-2018 , 06:54 AM
44+ A9s+ A5s AJo+ KTs+ KQo QTs+ JTs

44+ = shove all pairs 44 and higher
A9s+ = shove all suited Aces A9s and higher
A5s = shove A5s (because it has higher Equity vs respective calling range than A6s, A7s & A8s)
AJo+ = shove all off suited Aces AJo and higher
KTs+ = shove KQs, KJs & KTs
.
.
.
Equilab is wrong... Quote

      
m