Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
bigger 11...last 3 tables. Is this bad ICM wise? bigger 11...last 3 tables. Is this bad ICM wise?

05-28-2012 , 11:52 AM
    Poker Stars, $10 Buy-in (20,000/40,000 blinds, 5,000 ante) No Limit Hold'em Tournament, 8 Players
    Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

    UTG+2: 3,398,669 (85 bb)
    MP1: 4,523,007 (113.1 bb)
    MP2: 814,093 (20.4 bb)
    MP3: 2,854,207 (71.4 bb)
    CO: 907,620 (22.7 bb)
    BTN: 1,421,108 (35.5 bb)
    SB: 5,476,846 (136.9 bb)
    Hero (BB): 567,253 (14.2 bb)

    Preflop: Hero is BB with J A
    UTG+2 raises to 89,000, 5 folds, SB calls 69,000, Hero raises to 562,253 and is all-in, UTG+2 raises to 1,035,506, SB calls 946,506

    Flop: (2,673,265) A 5 7 (3 players, 1 is all-in)
    SB checks, UTG+2 bets 2,358,163 and is all-in, SB folds

    Turn: (2,673,265) 8 (2 players, 2 are all-in)
    River: (2,673,265) 9 (2 players, 2 are all-in)

    Spoiler:
    Results: 2,673,265 pot
    Final Board: A 5 7 8 9
    UTG+2 showed K A and won 2,673,265 (1,632,759 net)
    SB mucked and lost (-1,040,506 net)
    Hero showed J A and lost (-567,253 net)



    I don't have much knowledge of ICM, just figured I had enough equity. Any thoughts? thnx guys!
    bigger 11...last 3 tables. Is this bad ICM wise? Quote
    05-28-2012 , 12:55 PM
    You don't have any FE here against two hands whose ranges crush AJs. Fold, with 20+bbs or AQs might be a different case but this is a fold.
    bigger 11...last 3 tables. Is this bad ICM wise? Quote
    05-28-2012 , 12:58 PM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by homanga
    You don't have any FE here against two hands whose ranges crush AJs. Fold, with 20+bbs or AQs might be a different case but this is a fold.
    I think jamming 15bb is ok if UTG was opening wide as a big stack close to FT in a huge field tournament.
    bigger 11...last 3 tables. Is this bad ICM wise? Quote
    05-28-2012 , 01:14 PM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by homanga
    You don't have any FE here against two hands whose ranges crush AJs. Fold, with 20+bbs or AQs might be a different case but this is a fold.
    Wait, what? We have 40% vs a pretty nitty utg range (8%) and can easily have >50% if he's at all laggy. There's no way sb's range is crushing us, we're probably ahead of it. I think jam is clearly > fold barring utg being a ridiculous nit and I'd flat long before I'd consider folding vs ~everyone.
    bigger 11...last 3 tables. Is this bad ICM wise? Quote
    05-28-2012 , 01:31 PM
    I'm cool with the shove. We are short enough that we are going to be hard pressed to find ideal spots to chip up even vs weak competition. We don't have a ton of FE but it's a non 0 amount and the SB is often dead money.

    nh
    bigger 11...last 3 tables. Is this bad ICM wise? Quote
    05-28-2012 , 01:39 PM
    Missing lots of info - Thats probably why different opinions. imho...

    What is the read on the UTG raiser? The flatter? Table image of the Hero?
    bigger 11...last 3 tables. Is this bad ICM wise? Quote
    05-28-2012 , 02:40 PM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by stevepa
    Wait, what? We have 40% vs a pretty nitty utg range (8%) and can easily have >50% if he's at all laggy. There's no way sb's range is crushing us, we're probably ahead of it. I think jam is clearly > fold barring utg being a ridiculous nit and I'd flat long before I'd consider folding vs ~everyone.
    Admittedly the two villains stacks a quite deep (didn't pay a ton of attention to that prior). However this open from a 8% pfr first to act is more likely to be a top 4% hand imo, one cannot assume that an open from someone who raises 12% pre has the same range from all positions (I know you know this stevepa, but just pointing it out).

    I still don't love this spot because I feel like there is a decent percent of the time we get called by both and we get folds from both hardly ever. I think we get iso'd here by these top ~5% of hands from UTG+2 quite often.
    Quick stove shows the following. I dunno I'm certainly prone to being rusty but I think I like spots with some FE much better than this spot.

    top 4.8%

    equity win tie pots won pots tied
    Hand 0: 63.126% 59.80% 03.33% 53244684 2962890.50 { 99+, AJs+, KQs, AKo }
    Hand 1: 36.874% 33.55% 03.33% 29869343 2962890.50 { AdJd }


    ---

    104,450,544 games 0.000 secs 20,890,108,800 games/sec

    Top 5.4%

    equity win tie pots won pots tied
    Hand 0: 60.475% 57.44% 03.04% 59996250 3170402.00 { 88+, ATs+, KQs, AKo }
    Hand 1: 39.525% 36.49% 03.04% 38113490 3170402.00 { AdJd }


    ---
    bigger 11...last 3 tables. Is this bad ICM wise? Quote
    05-28-2012 , 02:49 PM
    feels fine unless UTG is a nit opening ~<7%
    bigger 11...last 3 tables. Is this bad ICM wise? Quote
    05-28-2012 , 02:58 PM
    Is everyone still shoving without the sb flatting? Not to distract from the post but just a point
    bigger 11...last 3 tables. Is this bad ICM wise? Quote
    05-28-2012 , 03:00 PM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by homanga
    Is everyone still shoving without the sb flatting? Not to distract from the post but just a point
    SB has 140bb. And you`re blocking hand he could be rarely trapping with.
    bigger 11...last 3 tables. Is this bad ICM wise? Quote
    05-28-2012 , 03:04 PM
    homanga, 8% was just a random number I invented, don't think OP indicated anything about UTG's stats. I think 8% is a super conservative estimate, vs a random I'd guess an avg utg minraise from a guy with lots of chips is 12-15%ish
    bigger 11...last 3 tables. Is this bad ICM wise? Quote
    05-28-2012 , 03:12 PM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by homanga
    Is everyone still shoving without the sb flatting? Not to distract from the post but just a point
    yes, SB makes it better for us for obv reasons. he is rarely bladed and mostly folding so we need less equity overall vs OR.
    bigger 11...last 3 tables. Is this bad ICM wise? Quote
    05-28-2012 , 03:24 PM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by dauntlessone
    Missing lots of info - Thats probably why different opinions. imho...

    What is the read on the UTG raiser? The flatter? Table image of the Hero?
    I'd been playing pretty tight after a 3 bet and c-bet went sour and left me with a short stack.

    This was UTG first hand at the table..so no info. He was top 3 (and german) so i thought he'd be opening ap/high & suited paint/ some suited conn.

    Once small blind called i figured there was enough dead money for a shove. He was loose and pretty bad, could well be ahead of his range.

    Maybe I'm being a lil' results orientated with this one. But afterwards I still felt there's prob. a better spot to dubble up and be back in it. I just couldn't find a fold. AJs looks so pretty after an hour of crap.
    bigger 11...last 3 tables. Is this bad ICM wise? Quote
    05-28-2012 , 04:56 PM
    Goddan, I think it is close. With your stack size, the (almost certainly) dead money, your injured table image with other players at the table, and the admittedly small possibility utg will fold, I would probably make same play you did.
    bigger 11...last 3 tables. Is this bad ICM wise? Quote
    05-28-2012 , 06:53 PM
    Has anyone mentioned that we totally have fold equity. And not a small amount at all. People fold to tiny reshoves all the time. (I mean, they aren't folding 50% or something, but I expect 20% isn't out of the realm of expectation depending on stats). Also, everything stevepa said about how AJs is an awesome hand. Chips go in the pot, it's where they belong.
    bigger 11...last 3 tables. Is this bad ICM wise? Quote
    05-28-2012 , 08:21 PM
    ^this. fe is everywhere, people just don't see it.
    snapshove
    bigger 11...last 3 tables. Is this bad ICM wise? Quote
    05-29-2012 , 05:05 AM
    Quote:
    You don't have any FE here against two hands whose ranges crush AJs
    Both of those things are wrong

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by PageUp
    Has anyone mentioned that we totally have fold equity. And not a small amount at all. People fold to tiny reshoves all the time. (I mean, they aren't folding 50% or something, but I expect 20% isn't out of the realm of expectation depending on stats). Also, everything stevepa said about how AJs is an awesome hand. Chips go in the pot, it's where they belong.
    Yep, I was so confused when homanga said we had no FE. This seems like a totally standard jam.
    bigger 11...last 3 tables. Is this bad ICM wise? Quote
    05-29-2012 , 05:12 AM
    We jammin'
    bigger 11...last 3 tables. Is this bad ICM wise? Quote
    05-29-2012 , 11:40 AM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by PageUp
    Has anyone mentioned that we totally have fold equity. And not a small amount at all. People fold to tiny reshoves all the time. (I mean, they aren't folding 50% or something, but I expect 20% isn't out of the realm of expectation depending on stats). Also, everything stevepa said about how AJs is an awesome hand. Chips go in the pot, it's where they belong.
    I may have mentioned it
    bigger 11...last 3 tables. Is this bad ICM wise? Quote

          
    m