Attainable ROI in the 45 man turbos - MTT Poker Strategy

Two Plus Two Forums Poker Strategy No Limit Tournaments

Attainable ROI in the 45 man turbos

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 1 of 2

1 2

Page 1 of 2

1 2

05-23-2008 , 04:23 PM

carpediem84

enthusiast

Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 84

I was wondering what an attainable roi at the 45 man turbos could be? I have been messing around with the 3/45's and done about 10 8 tabling sessions. I am rolled for the 12's but just want to get used to them.

I have a 70% roi small sample I know.

Just wondering what some of the 45 man grinders have over what sample size? How many do u play at a time? And if you want to share in Screen names of people that I can rail that would be nice too. I play on pokerstars BTW.

ANy other info or link to strategy or 45 man info hreads would be much appreciated.

Thanks a lot

Quote

05-23-2008 , 04:29 PM

Dantes

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 10,833

14% here, balla ldo

Quote

05-23-2008 , 05:07 PM

twonine29

old hand

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 1,261

Me thinks the 45man turbos are getting harder to be profitable on, as they're are more and more regs grinding them, boo.

Quote

05-23-2008 , 07:25 PM

Lyrrad

adept

Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 1,012

There's a thread in the MTT Strategy section about a similar question right now.
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh....php?p=4285666

Personally I got about 33% at the $1 after over 800 and 29% at $6 after over 450. I got higher at the $3 and the $11, but with smaller sample sizes.

Quote

05-23-2008 , 07:26 PM

mlagoo

old fogey

Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 19,223

threeve

Quote

05-23-2008 , 11:24 PM

tedtodd

veteran

Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 3,154

Attainable or sustainable

Quote

05-23-2008 , 11:24 PM

Jasonfp

grinder

Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 619

mine is about 35% at the $60s

Quote

05-24-2008 , 03:44 AM

JayPez

old hand

Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 1,615

long term i think its about 30% for the 45's

Quote

05-24-2008 , 07:01 AM

flyingmoose

veteran

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 2,224

"Attainable" is such a pointless qualifier because it implies perfect play. If you played perfectly all the time you could probably get something off-the-charts good. Better than anyone with a decent sample size has or ever will achieve. Even the best players probably have no idea how much money a perfect poker player could make, and it's totally pointless to try and figure out.

If you just want to compare: I pull like 20% at the 60s and 70% at the 12/180s and my penis is 7.25 inches.

There are, of course, sample size issues. I only measured my penis once and I wasn't even that aroused at the time.

Quote

05-24-2008 , 07:22 AM

#10

frenchfish

old hand

Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 1,369

Quote:

Originally Posted by flyingmoose

With the amount of regs and the sick variance of turbos mtt , i t think 20% at the 60s is about the best a solid 2+2er could hope for over a large sample.

7.25 inches = xx cm ?

Quote

05-24-2008 , 09:19 AM

#11

Dantes

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 10,833

Quote:

Originally Posted by frenchfish

With the amount of regs and the sick variance of turbos mtt , i t think 20% at the 60s is about the best a solid 2+2er could hope for over a large sample.

7.25 inches = xx cm ?

1 in *2.54= cm

and yes, 20% in 60s is really good

Quote

05-24-2008 , 06:39 PM

#12

mutigers

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 37,167

Quote:

Originally Posted by twonine29

Me thinks the 45man turbos are getting harder to be profitable on, as they're are more and more regs grinding them, boo.

yarly...

mutigers5591 1,586 $12 $55 21% $19,755 these are the 60s, but my sample size is too small still and the roi has def beeen going down due to i suck at poker and the games get 2hard4me

edit- and my first couple hundred i only like 6-8 tabled, didnt 12-16 table either so that obv comes into play

Quote

05-24-2008 , 06:54 PM

#13

mrwongie

journeyman

Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 234

btw why is the rake higher on 60s than others.

for example

60$= 55$+5$ rake = 5/55= ~9.01%
27$= 25$+2$ rake = 2/25= 8%
12$ = 11$+1$ rake = 1/11= ~9.01%
3.25$= 3$+.25$rake = .25/3= 8.33%

wtf why do we pay a full 1% more for rake than 27$ sngs. i was gonna email stars about i dont play much sng so i dont really care but for you 60$ sng grinders, should def bring this up to stars.

Quote

05-24-2008 , 10:18 PM

#14

vic_the_pro

enthusiast

Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 64

i have a 31% roi playing the 60$ turbos on stars, but i only have a 550 game sample size... so my roi is probably inflated. hope that helps though

Quote

06-29-2008 , 10:59 PM

#15

Getmoney$916

banned

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 2,024

Im gonna be grinding $27 45mans whats a good roi ob those over a good sample size?

Quote

06-29-2008 , 11:04 PM

#16

Dan87

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 10,079

Quote

06-29-2008 , 11:13 PM

#17

Getmoney$916

banned

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 2,024

[QUOTE=Dan87;4872363]3%[/QUOTE
seriously?

Quote

06-29-2008 , 11:24 PM

#18

mutigers

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 37,167

20% is prolly as good as it gets for the 27s/60s

i actually dont think 20% is possible at the 60s, i think the only person who has done that over a reasonable sample size is dna2rna,all other regs hover between 14-17%...and its been said over and over again but the games really are gettng harder. or maybe im just not adjusting. idk

Quote

06-30-2008 , 10:39 AM

#19

Ignigina

enthusiast

Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 53

17% ROI
$60/45 27/130 21% ITM
(2/13/44/30/11)

I suck though, no joke.

Small sample size too, I went back to the standard big field size MTTs (I already have a day job

)

In a sense the 60s seem easier than the 27s and lower cause of higher predictability of shoving ranges and less bluffs at low blinds (imo fwiw etc)

Quote

06-30-2008 , 10:54 AM

#20

Perplexity

old hand

Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 1,740

eleventy billion

Quote

07-10-2008 , 08:05 PM

#21

sixsixtie

veteran

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 2,364

I've got 45% over 1700 tourneys at 11s and 6.50s.

Quote

07-10-2008 , 10:11 PM

#22

Bagonirix

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 7,248

Quote:

Originally Posted by sixsixtie

I've got 45% over 1700 tourneys at 11s and 6.50s.

LFISBRTL?

something like that

Quote

07-10-2008 , 10:49 PM

#23

Ryot

veteran

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 2,198

25% over 4,000 6.50's & 12's

Quote

07-10-2008 , 10:58 PM

#24

Zima421

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 18,973

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ryot

25% over 4,000 6.50's & 12's

move up...

Quote

07-11-2008 , 07:34 AM

#25

blind squirrel

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 8,195

mine is 45%ish over 740 games according to sharkscope. a lot of 1.10s and 3.25s tho, prolly just played 100 > those.

Quote

Page 1 of 2

First

1 2

Last

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 1 of 2

First

1 2

Last