Thought this was kinda int flop and turn decisions.
Still in late reg so nowhere near the money yet.




We open EP and get called by UTG2, LJ, and BB.
We cbet half and get called by UTG2 and BB.

Why are we cbetting 4way here
As played guess were ripping and gonna get called very often

This

raggedy board, EP/MP cold callers shouldn't have 33/44 here much -- like T65 would be a lot worse to cbet imo cuz sets.
Villains are in a very awk spot with their 55-99 here aswell and might just have to fold them against EP shortie cbet 4ways.

Not super enamored of open off 25BB EP but probably ok. Think if I'm betting flop here with AJo I'm clearly betting most if not entire range here so why not 4K instead of 6K? Sets up bigger turn jam when we get called and have premiums and hands we want to bluff. I do think if we're taking this line we're basically committing to betting flop/jamming turn to get most hands worse than a T to fold.

EDIT: I should state that I think we should mostly be checking here.

Wouldn't mind playing this combo along with AcQo and AcKc as a very infrequent overbet jam OTF. Being multiway has bloated to pot to where, combined with the enhanced need for equity denial/protection due to being multiway, you're incentivized to create an overbetting strategy for specifically JJ-QQ, KK to some extent (likely not AA), AT, some KT, 33-44 (prob not TT) if you got em, and adding in small slivers of specifically these air combos (AcJo through AcKo) I think makes sense to heavily block OOP's snapping range (NFDs), and add some extra equity when snapped (you should prob have ~24-28% equity when snapped). It's actually a really dry board when you have the nut blocker--you should get tons of folds.

Otherwise just x flop. I think your sizing makes sense as an alternate sizing for overpairs, Tx, FDs, et al but not this particular combo.

Think that comes with a need to check specifically AA and TT a lot multiway, and obv you are not cbetting nearly all FDs.