Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
*** Official Party Poker NJ Suggestions Thread *** *** Official Party Poker NJ Suggestions Thread ***

10-19-2014 , 02:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FromACtoLV
Okterrific, they don't give you more points for higher levels, but they do lower the cost of everything in the store the higher your level is, so essentially you are earning at a higher rate.

The key is, don't go on vacation for a month, lose your level and then buy things in the store.
So does this essentially mean that when you earn a given level, it is only for a month? I have been playing at the same level for a while so I have yet to go "below." But this seriously sucks if earning a given level only provides 1 month of decreased points redemption. As far as I can tell that's the only benefit to currently earning a higher player level.
10-22-2014 , 02:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by okterrific
What did i do? i just stopped playing on PP. ez fix. discouraged player goes elsewhere / stops playing poker.

im just so glad im no longer having those problems.
If you keep posting that you quit every few weeks, eventually they're gonna figure it out...



Quote:
Originally Posted by ghost_of_m
So does this essentially mean that when you earn a given level, it is only for a month? I have been playing at the same level for a while so I have yet to go "below." But this seriously sucks if earning a given level only provides 1 month of decreased points redemption. As far as I can tell that's the only benefit to currently earning a higher player level.
It's basically the same as almost every other site...

"When you reach a key level, you get immediate access to the specific rewards for the rest of the month / quarter and the following one too.

Once you reach a level just earn the same number of points in the following month / quarter in order to stay put, or more to move up again."
10-22-2014 , 05:36 AM
It's preposterous to think 90% of dominating hands end up losing. That's utterly ridiculous. If that were the case, the site would be closed down already due to regs losing too much. Are you (op) legitimately proposing that AK will lose to KQ 85- 90% of the time?
11-20-2014 , 04:32 PM
What is the timetable for making the WPT Steps playable for the partypoker network? I didn't notice any WPT seats generated for WPT500 UK. This will remain the same for WPT Fallsview and Borgata until improvements are made.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Party_Rep
The WPT Steps are under review and changes will be forthcoming. Agreed that the structures should vary especially as you've cited with the blind duration....
11-22-2014 , 12:57 AM
Please add PLO8 and PLO to your mobile app.

Thanks
12-05-2014 , 02:19 PM
Now that there is a new rep, maybe you will consider making some changes to your sngs.

Create a 70%-30% payout structure. Revise your blinds to start 10/20 15/30 25/50 50/100 75/150 and so on like most others are structured and creates a better flow to your games.
12-08-2014 , 05:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GRE3N
Please add PLO8 and PLO to your mobile app.

Thanks
Noted, thanks for the feedback

Quote:
Originally Posted by bballwiz
Now that there is a new rep, maybe you will consider making some changes to your sngs.

Create a 70%-30% payout structure. Revise your blinds to start 10/20 15/30 25/50 50/100 75/150 and so on like most others are structured and creates a better flow to your games.
Sent to the Poker Room Team for review...

Hi

I can see this thread is lacking a Party Rep response - however, please be aware I will begin monitoring the feedback her and will ensure it reaches the correct teams for review.

Thanks

Colette
12-08-2014 , 02:57 PM
hey party_rep. just started playing cash games on your site and i noticed that when i call a players bet and win the pot at showdown i don't get to see my opponent's losing hand. shouldn't I be able to see his hand since he was the last person to bet? it may not seem like a big deal but it would def help me define my opponent's playing style if i can see his hand. I know at the casino the bettor is supposed to show their hand at showdown
12-08-2014 , 07:34 PM
lol still no waiting list.


Also in rebuys more than once ive been eliminated with time left on the clock to rebuy. 2x lately ive noticed both times w 3-4 sec left on the 20sec rebuy clock the " you have been eliminated" window pops up. GREAT software.


tony it shows up in HH (not in replay).
@ table. right top. click on menu-HH. should be easier but it is there


Also why get rid of the daily 5$rebuy turbo sat to a 100$ tik? it usually paid 6 on a 5 tix Guar if im not mistaken. why get rid of things that are working?

you want to be adding sats to hi buyin events and adding to the GUar not taking away sats.

i know PP only cares about getting folks in the pit and poker is way way way secondary but come on.

Last edited by okterrific; 12-08-2014 at 07:43 PM.
12-08-2014 , 08:01 PM
Please add waitlists and turn hole cards face up when players go all-in in cash games.
12-08-2014 , 08:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by matrat
Please add waitlists and turn hole cards face up when players go all-in in cash games.
+1, agree with both sentiments

I will say, I don't have a lot of hope for revealing the hands at showdown. The software is setup so people can choose "always muck" when they are losing. Adding an exception to that may be more involved than we think it is.
12-09-2014 , 09:58 AM
can we please get some freaking sit and goes back on party/Borgata? You got rid of all 6max sngs over $50, yet still have HU sng up to $500 that no one ever plays. Why? Can someone over there please explain the logic to me? Wont hold my breath on a response, but thanks!
12-09-2014 , 12:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyFlow27
hey party_rep. just started playing cash games on your site and i noticed that when i call a players bet and win the pot at showdown i don't get to see my opponent's losing hand. shouldn't I be able to see his hand since he was the last person to bet? it may not seem like a big deal but it would def help me define my opponent's playing style if i can see his hand. I know at the casino the bettor is supposed to show their hand at showdown
It will show in the Hand History

Quote:
Originally Posted by matrat
Please add waitlists and turn hole cards face up when players go all-in in cash games.
I will feedback this to our PRM

Quote:
Originally Posted by wildman75
can we please get some freaking sit and goes back on party/Borgata? You got rid of all 6max sngs over $50, yet still have HU sng up to $500 that no one ever plays. Why? Can someone over there please explain the logic to me? Wont hold my breath on a response, but thanks!

Will again send this along to the Poker Room team for review

Thanks for the feedback

Colette
12-10-2014 , 05:30 AM
Individual tournament lobbies need some more useful information.

Now, with GSSS around the corner, these changes would go a long way to actually having more of the qualifiers / satellites get the required number of players.

1. Currently, "Starting Stack" is only displayed before a tournament starts. I have no idea why this is. "Starting Stack" should always be displayed so that those considering late registration have an idea of how many big blinds they are going to start with.

2. We must know the "Minimum Players" needed to launch a tournament. I have no idea why this hasn't been programmed in yet, and I know it has come up a few times over the past year. Many times, people will not register for a tournament because they don't think it will get enough players to launch. But nobody knows how many players a given tournament needs for certain, except PartyPoker. Sharing this information with us would be very useful.

3. In a related note, "Maximum Players" is programmed in to all the lobbies. But tournaments rarely get the 3500 players needed to make that field relevant. Maybe that space could be devoted to "Minimum Players" instead. If we hit the maximum one day and people can't register, that will be a great problem for us all to have.
12-10-2014 , 02:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghost_of_m
Individual tournament lobbies need some more useful information.

Now, with GSSS around the corner, these changes would go a long way to actually having more of the qualifiers / satellites get the required number of players.

1. Currently, "Starting Stack" is only displayed before a tournament starts. I have no idea why this is. "Starting Stack" should always be displayed so that those considering late registration have an idea of how many big blinds they are going to start with.

2. We must know the "Minimum Players" needed to launch a tournament. I have no idea why this hasn't been programmed in yet, and I know it has come up a few times over the past year. Many times, people will not register for a tournament because they don't think it will get enough players to launch. But nobody knows how many players a given tournament needs for certain, except PartyPoker. Sharing this information with us would be very useful.

3. In a related note, "Maximum Players" is programmed in to all the lobbies. But tournaments rarely get the 3500 players needed to make that field relevant. Maybe that space could be devoted to "Minimum Players" instead. If we hit the maximum one day and people can't register, that will be a great problem for us all to have.
+1 on all the above
12-11-2014 , 10:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghost_of_m
1. Currently, "Starting Stack" is only displayed before a tournament starts. I have no idea why this is. "Starting Stack" should always be displayed so that those considering late registration have an idea of how many big blinds they are going to start with.
10/10 would suggest again

I am not too proud to admit I late-regged for a tourney in GSSS I thinking the starting stack was 10,000 (like in the high buy-in of the same event). It was only 5,000. I was disappointed to say the least.
12-11-2014 , 06:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by japhy
10/10 would suggest again

I am not too proud to admit I late-regged for a tourney in GSSS I thinking the starting stack was 10,000 (like in the high buy-in of the same event). It was only 5,000. I was disappointed to say the least.
Doing basic math is difficult.
12-12-2014 , 08:30 PM
what happen to the 10k today ? cancelled ? can you please put it back to start at 7pm ?
12-12-2014 , 08:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerished
what happen to the 10k today ? cancelled ? can you please put it back to start at 7pm ?
agreed this 6pm start time sucks
Flawlessbinkage
12-13-2014 , 11:21 AM
Everyone bitched and complained so they moved it - now look. It just goes to show why you idiots play poker and don't own a business.
12-13-2014 , 07:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoMo662
Everyone bitched and complained so they moved it - now look. It just goes to show why you idiots play poker and don't own a business.
No you
12-13-2014 , 08:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoMo662
Everyone bitched and complained so they moved it - now look. It just goes to show why you idiots play poker and don't own a business.
Yeah guys we have to be careful in what we ask/complain about to Party. just look at how fast they fixed that waitlist problem more than a year ago...

oh wait nvmind PP was never listened to its poker players b4 so wut da **** u talk bout?
12-13-2014 , 09:00 PM
who are these players asked for 6pm change ? i haven't seen anyone here asking for it, they just needed a reason to extend the late reg from 8 levels to 10 levels
12-13-2014 , 10:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerished
who are these players asked for 6pm change ? i haven't seen anyone here asking for it, they just needed a reason to extend the late reg from 8 levels to 10 levels
This. Its not just about one simple change either. There are 20 different things that need to be fixed along with start times. Theres no one who said move it to 6pm and itll be way more successful.
12-14-2014 , 12:12 AM
i literally have not played the 6 pm start time and will not ever be playing it during the week. it does not work for my schedule except for maybe on a sunday. i complained when this change happened and i'm glad to hear i'm not the only one who doesn't like it.

makes sense that they just wanted later late reg. sigh.

      
m