Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Rake increase Rake increase

05-05-2014 , 05:46 PM
There is only poker room near where I live. Two days ago they increased the rake in their lower limit games (3-6, 6-12) from $4 to $5. This was done, they said, so that they could make it easier to hit a jackpot.

Are these games still beatable if you're a reasonably good player?
05-05-2014 , 05:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobC
There is only poker room near where I live. Two days ago they increased the rake in their lower limit games (3-6, 6-12) from $4 to $5. This was done, they said, so that they could make it easier to hit a jackpot.

Are these games still beatable if you're a reasonably good player?
3/6: no
6/12: yes

When is the $5 dropped? In increments (like $2 at the flop, $1 at $40, $1 at $60, $1 at $80), or all at once? I'd assume you'd average $400 rake per 100 hands, or 33.33 BB/100. A winning player will play tighter and splash around less, so they may pay 3 BB/100. So i think that's beatable; just don't replace a minimum wage job with it.
05-05-2014 , 07:03 PM
Talking about rake... how do you calculate if the rake is beatable and when do you know if you should keep playing?
05-05-2014 , 07:44 PM
The rake is collected all at once on the flop. And, I should add, if it/they are beatable, should you make any adjustments in your play?

Last edited by BobC; 05-05-2014 at 07:49 PM. Reason: grammar
05-07-2014 , 03:00 AM
my guesstimate is that the 3/6 is not beatable and the 6/12 might be beatable for 2 or 4 dollars an hour.
05-07-2014 , 03:14 AM
I agree that 3/6 is not only unbeatable, but you will likely lose quite a lot. That's prolly close to 10 BB/100 in rake you are paying so it would need to be a game where literally everyone else is playing 70+% of their hands to even break even.

6/12 brings the rake closer to 5 BB/100, so you can def make a little money if the games are super soft. If it is a total fishfest where everyone is playing 70+% of their hands, you could prolly make 1 BB/hr. But if it's not, BBB's estimate of 2-4 dollars/hr sounds right.
05-07-2014 , 09:32 AM
Quote:
my guesstimate is that the 3/6 is not beatable and the 6/12 might be beatable for 2 or 4 dollars an hour.
Thanks bro...good to know.

Are online game also unbeatable for those levels?

Well...better work at mcdonalds then play low stakes...
05-07-2014 , 04:32 PM
online there is some combo of rakeback/bonus on most sites, which helps out. it still depends on how fishy the game is and how highly raked it is. if you have a specific site/stake in mind then let us know
05-09-2014 , 07:38 PM
Well i'm playing mostly on Stars... What would be a good lvl to play at? Lets start with this question... Beside the high stakes like 20\40$, is there any stakes that are profitable? If yes, then on which stakes and on which sites?

I hear people say limit hold em is dead... Is it even worth my time to play in limit games or should i play others forms of poker? Id like to at least beat the game for 1BB\100 ...
05-09-2014 , 10:01 PM
I would say at the min. 10/20 on stars. at 5/10 and 3/6 the rake is 2.46/BB and 2.6/BB. At those stake the regs are decent enough that your edge is going to be so small and variance going to play a big part in how you run for 100k+ hands. However I always found 2/4 to be the sweet spot since all the SNE grinder at min are grinding +3/6 and the rake is higher at 2/4 than 3/6 so every good regs avoid 2/4 and the line up at it are pretty weak.
05-09-2014 , 10:28 PM
Quote:
I would say at the min. 10/20 on stars. at 5/10 and 3/6 the rake is 2.46/BB and 2.6/BB. At those stake the regs are decent enough that your edge is going to be so small and variance going to play a big part in how you run for 100k+ hands. However I always found 2/4 to be the sweet spot since all the SNE grinder at min are grinding +3/6 and the rake is higher at 2/4 than 3/6 so every good regs avoid 2/4 and the line up at it are pretty weak.
You think 10\20$ is a good game? Is the competition much harder then 2\4 and 3\6 or is it worth my studying hours to try to beat it.

Funny enough i found 2\4$ to be my best poker results. Would it be fair to say that 1\2$ should be avoided? I'm actually getting my worst results there...

I've got 20\40$ games near where i live. I don't know much about the competition. But is live limit poker usually softer then online?

So if the edge is so small at 3\6$ and 5\10$ why are regs still playing it? Maybe its called poker addiction... Hey i'm making 18$ an hour doing construction work. I think i won't quit my job for the low limit games...lol

Coming back to the other question i had, is there another poker game i should focus on instead or limit?
05-11-2014 , 12:53 AM
yes live is a ton easier than online. its actually beatable.

no dont quit your job. poker is dead. low stakes is a massive rake trap. high stakes takes a big bankroll and lots of skill. you missed out by 10 yrs. too bad.
05-12-2014 , 05:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdr0317
3/6: no
6/12: yes

When is the $5 dropped? In increments (like $2 at the flop, $1 at $40, $1 at $60, $1 at $80), or all at once? I'd assume you'd average $400 rake per 100 hands, or 33.33 BB/100. A winning player will play tighter and splash around less, so they may pay 3 BB/100. So i think that's beatable; just don't replace a minimum wage job with it.
jdr -- thank you for the thoughts here. i'm assuming this has been discussed to death in the past, curious if there is a standard amount that is thought to be too much to be beatable?

if you are raking out 3BB/100 and suggesting that is beatable ... could 5BB/100 be beatable?

at 20/40 if we are paying $7/half hour, am I right in my math if that comes out to approx 1BB/100? (i'm assuming about 33 hands per hour)

thank you for the thoughts ....

      
m