Quote:
Originally Posted by dragon1893
iirc you chattilted a lot against shortstacks once in studhigh. do you feel bad now since you think it may be a viable strategy?
do you work on your chattilting?
who's the best chattilter you know?
Nah, I don't really feel bad at all. That chat tilt took place at a stud 8 game, and I stand by it. I've always known that shortstacking stud 8 has its advantages. It just ruins the game when there's 8 people at a table and 4 of them are shortstacking. It kinda bugged me to see regulars constantly sitting on shortstacks, when I was a novice player, learning to play this new game at the 30/60 level, and here are these guys who basically play every day, ruining the game by leaving and coming back any time they have more than 6 BB.
Typing/thinking this out, it's striking me that while playing a short stack might help out the gamblers who can just get it all in rather than making a skillful fold... It also probably cuts into the potential BB/100 of the shortstacker. So maybe it's irrational for me to get mad at them. Regardless, I still have a lot of dislike for the Russian shortstackers.
Do I work on chattilting? I can't say I really spend too much time away from the table thinking about potential chat stuff, but I do have plenty of practice. I'm proud to say that it's been years since I told someone I hope they or any of their loved ones get cancer/AIDS. I try to stay a little more fresh and original.
Favorite chat-tilter is spoonce, of course
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heisenb3rg
Boc's evolution as a poker player and his poker career always struck me as pretty awsome/interesting... Shows a player who was very interested in learning and changing his game.
When I first started grinding like 3-6 to 5-10, he was in just about all my games. He was a very tight straightforward reg, not very good, but nothing that bad. I ranked him in the medium/bottom half of winning regs at that limit. He didnt challenge you, but wouldnt make too many blunders.
Then all of a sudden out of no where he turned into a bat**** spewtarded lagtag, and imo one of the worst of them all at the time. My opinion of his game shifted drastically. At one point I think he was about the worst "professional" reg on stars. He would literally fight for every pot. At this time I was pretty convinced he was a losing player. This lasted a couple months at least.
Right after this, I remmeber him asking community for feedback posting an epic large losing graph, and me thinking "ya, makes sense". Offered my criticism as well as a set of about 20 hands where he went crazy against me in a two month span.
Then in about a month or two after he made that post (and everyone telling him he was playing too agro) His spews started to become more and more selective.. Eventually I started thinking "man, boc has really smartened up his game, not just coincidence" and after about another month or two eventually ranked him among the tougher regs in the game.
After this point I met him in LV and was chatting poker theory with him , and he definitly had the right thought process of the game. Excellent thinker and was convinced at the time he was a very tough player.
and sure enough about 6 months after that he went on an epic 100/200 heater, sick win rate at all games and was challenging like everyone...
Im sure boc still has the awsomeness still in him, but is now learning the ways of the poker buddha (Tpirahna), and the other elements required to be a poker professional.
Thanks Heis. Your progression sure is an interesting one too. I remember how fun it used to be to watch you spew whenever anyone took a suspicious line. Then you calmed down for a while and seemed to eliminate spew from your game almost entirely. Then, you figured out how to restrict it just to good spots, rather than anytime anything looked suspicious. And now, you play high stakes where spewing is totally acceptable/necessary
Obv a very simplified story, but I think it's a fairly accurate timeline.
Quote:
Originally Posted by daiquiri
This was the very first hand I ever played against you and it's still bugging me what was the thought process behind it, because I would have never considered playing it this way so I take this opportunity to ask about the reasoning behind your flop/turn play, ty
Poker Stars $5/$10 Limit Hold'em - 6 players
The Official 2+2 Hand Converter By DeucesCracked Poker Videos
Pre Flop: (1.4 SB) Hero is BTN with Q J
3 folds, Hero raises, 1 fold, BB calls
Flop: (4.4 SB) Q 3 Q (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets, BB raises, Hero calls
Turn: (4.2 BB) A (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets, BB calls
River: (6.2 BB) 3 (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets, BB calls
Ok daiq. I still don't get what you don't get. And I still don't get what you were doing either.
Preflop I raise because I'm on the button and have Ax. I cbet the flop, hoping you'll give up a lot of small card hands. You c/r and I definitely don't love my hand, but the board is so dry and attackable, I'm not folding Ax just yet. Then I turn an ace and you check the turn and river, so I'm certainly going to valuebet because you look like you're scared of the A and just have some kind of pocket pair hand.
Why did you check the turn?