Quote:
Originally Posted by raheem
Two towers hit. Three towers fell. Obviously set up.
There is much more in the birds eye view. That they all three fell in a manner exactly like demolitions and none of the destruction was satisfactorily explained are the compelling reasons to doubt the official story. For the TTs you've got the most audacious hand waiving imaginable that actually pretends to be serious. For WTC 7 you have straight fraud on top of a theory so wild that it can't even be simulated to approximate what was seen. They can't even make **** up, within the very flexible constraints provided by the predetermination "it was because fire", that looks like what everyone saw. They had to straight lie to forge a completely unrepresentative model.