Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
random marriage posts random marriage posts

06-30-2013 , 11:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by airwave16
so what in the UK do the jews not get equal access to? i'm gonna be real disappointed if all someone says is "church of england" or some such nonsense.
They get additional access eg to their Beth Din courts. Muslims get extra access to their Sharia courts. Sikhs extra rights which allow them to wear turbans more often, Hindus get extra rights to have outdoor cremations (or that's in the pipeline I believe).
06-30-2013 , 11:52 PM
Ffs you say "extra rights" like it's something you despise. Is gay marriage an "extra right?"
06-30-2013 , 11:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cwocwoc
It is a response to pvn's question "WHY should they want to maintain a separate identity??"
So then I have to re-bump this question you ignored:

Quote:
Originally Posted by pvn
How is it absurd?

You're championing one type of segregation. How is it absurd to ask your opinion on another form of it?
and this one....

Quote:
Originally Posted by pvn
yes but take it to the next step... WHY should they want to maintain a separate identity??

Also, what the **** does maintaining that separate identity have to do with segregating them with respect to marriage?
Note I'm not asking IF they do, I'm asking WHY they SHOULD because you seem to think it's important that they do so.

and while we're at it... bump this too

Quote:
Originally Posted by pvn
lol

Yes, we all understand that you don't like one and (overtly) don't care about the other.

Now GO TO THE NEXT STEP and tell us why anyone else should give a **** about your own personal subjective preferences.
06-30-2013 , 11:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cwocwoc
Don't get hung up over precise words. I support pluralism ie respecting the differences of other groups. Here you go.
Why can't you actually answer the question I asked you?
06-30-2013 , 11:54 PM
Outdoor cremation/ big ass BBQ funeral is a movement I can get with.
06-30-2013 , 11:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmakinmecrzy
Ffs you say "extra rights" like it's something you despise.
How do you get that from this ?

"I support pluralism"
06-30-2013 , 11:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cwocwoc
They get additional access eg to their Beth Din courts. Muslims get extra access to their Sharia courts. Sikhs extra rights which allow them to wear turbans more often, Hindus get extra rights to have outdoor cremations (or that's in the pipeline I believe).
holy crap it's true. you really are just completely ****ing ******ed.

just kill yourself already you worthless waste of life.
06-30-2013 , 11:59 PM
Yea, except you don't really understand what it means and you're hiding behind this weird ass mantra of "pluralism! Pluralism! Separate but equal!"
07-01-2013 , 12:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2/325Falcon
Outdoor cremation/ big ass BBQ funeral is a movement I can get with.
Not if this is a no beef Hindu thing, tho.
07-01-2013 , 12:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ganstaman
Why can't you actually answer the question I asked you?
or... any question at all. With a complete sentence that makes sense and addresses what was asked.

Both good.
07-01-2013 , 12:01 AM
I think we should allow twinks and bears to wed. I'm not okay with two twinks or two bears getting married, because how will I know which one is a top and which is a bottom?

Cwoc if you can't look at a gay man w/o wondering if he prefers to give or take, i have some news for you. You may be gay.
07-01-2013 , 12:02 AM
i am glad to see how upset people from all political walks of life are that a poster like cwocwoc is allowed to do this shtick on other parts of this forum, and very glad to know that this sorta crap wouldn't be tolerated in the actual politics forum for very long
07-01-2013 , 12:03 AM
Holy ****, what if the bottom is actually the "husband?"

And what about otters?
07-01-2013 , 12:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2/325Falcon
I WILL NOT BE CHAINED.
Just pretend to be gay and you can sneak into that thread.
07-01-2013 , 12:06 AM
Mat Sklansky will not make me hide my sexuality.
07-01-2013 , 12:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ganstaman
Why can't you actually answer the question I asked you?

I have given you my position. I believe in pluralism. Within this context that means equal gay marriages/civil partnerships. This would avoid the need to redefine heterosexual marriages. It's a win-win.
07-01-2013 , 12:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
Just pretend to be gay and you can sneak into that thread.
Is this thread for all-comers ?
07-01-2013 , 12:10 AM
BUT WHAT IF BOTH LESBIANS LIKE TO BE RIGHT-LEGGED SCISSORS? WHAT THE **** EVER SHALL WE DO?
07-01-2013 , 12:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cwocwoc
I have given you my position. I believe in pluralism. Within this context that means equal gay marriages/civil partnerships. This would avoid the need to redefine heterosexual marriages. It's a win-win.
Just a hypothetical here, if you were gay, would you be more of a top or a bottom? Or would you be like a power bottom?
07-01-2013 , 12:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cwocwoc
I have given you my position. I believe in pluralism. Within this context that means equal gay marriages/civil partnerships. This would avoid the need to redefine heterosexual marriages. It's a win-win.
That doesn't answer the question I actually asked. Try again.
07-01-2013 , 12:15 AM
we're calling it "heterosexual marriage" now?
07-01-2013 , 12:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
Just a hypothetical here, if you were gay, would you be more of a top or a bottom? Or would you be like a power bottom?
I probably wouldn't bother with the physical side of it at all.
07-01-2013 , 12:17 AM
BUT WHAT IF I LIKE TO BE THE PENETRATOR BUT WOULD RATHER HAVE THE OTHER DUDE TAKING IT ON TOP. WHAT THE **** SHOULD YOU CALL ME?
07-01-2013 , 12:19 AM
WHAT IF I ONLY HAVE GAY THREESOMES AND LIKE TO BE THE ONE IN THE MIDDLE? AM I A TOP OR A BOTTOM? WHAT'S GOING ON?
07-01-2013 , 12:19 AM
WHATEVER SHALL I BE CALLED IF I CAN'T JUST BE CALLED "HUSBAND"?

      
m