+1

It's no surprise that two PoS should stick together.

Hey what about me? I'm a PoS too, remember.

Go team PoS.

just saw a post report, but i don't recall this either.

More interesting now is there are specific posters who want to specifically continue to post about this. Because it is attention-grabbing to call someone a (alleged) rapist is one plausibility?

Spank, why wouldn't we want to bring up Foldn's past Spank? It's indicative of his character and makes it easier to scroll past his Hypergraphia screeds SJWs. If he didn't want it brought up he should't have posted it on the internet.

That's all you got?

Wil posted a lame threat. You posted soon after and told him to PM you about it. Then Wil posted something about how he was out of line and you or a mod posted something about how threats wouldn't be tolerated, so I assumed that's what you asked him to PM you about.

I never reported anything so I figured either you came across it yourself or someone else reported it.

Just so it's clear I'm not lying. Starting around post 360 in the Milo thread. (Sorry, can't multi post because the thread is locked. Also, it's hard to say if and/or how many posts Chez deleted. I can't find the specific threat that set off the series of posts below but it's clear Mat and Chez both had a problem with it.)


Mat to Wil: "i, for one, am not so thrilled about koreans talking about nukes. and answer my pm."

chez: "What's not allowed is bringing up other posters familly as a way to insult, attack, troll or annoy them. Wil: Nothing that seems like a threat of violence please."

Wil: "Yep. I shouldn't have said it, it was in response to Jbrochu's idiocy. I'll stop it."

me: "Just so it's clear - I did not report or ask anyone to talk to Wil about his lame threats."

i didn't think you were lying. i just don't remember.

did i really say i don't like Samoans talking about nukes? admittedly, when i start posting in this forum, i'm not usually sober.

There's no deleted posts, but I guess maybe it's supposed to be this one, fwiw.

well named, i may have to demod you so you can go back to posting interesting things and not worry about nonsense moderation issues. this is your first warning. we'll make it a three and you're out.

By my count I've already volunteered to be de-modded twice, so I can't fathom what you're waiting for. :P

hmm. for a variety of reasons , people on this site who are moderators like to be moderators. if you don't feel like continuing, say aye. and boom it's done.

i think you feel like saying Aye?

I vote nay.

I won't say aye quite yet. I will wait a bit longer to see how stuff shakes out re: mod forum discussions.

P.S. the rest of you didn't see these posts. :P

in case it's not clear, i think well named is awesome. the last thing i want to see is his experience and contributions on this site be ruined because he decided to be a moderator in any forum.

In my opinion it's not really the kind of "derailing" I was intending to moderate. I don't think it would be a great idea mostly because I think it involves putting too much of a thumb on the scale in terms of evaluating posting quality. I don't think the mods should effectively decide who wins arguments, and that's what it sounds like to me.

They wont be ruined by anyone how knows his posting in the first place. Hes like a like a damn saint.

Ahh you mean ruined for him. Yeah i guess.

Cheers. I'm going to make dinner now and drink more.

Would it be possible for well named to say Aye for chez and whosnext?

How about we just make WN the mod and boot chez & co. back to SMP?

why would trolly and noodle be adding value to the thread repeating the contentious refusal to let go they usually do?

Nah mean,

I just agree withe wat will sed. Ware not ganing up on yuo

isn't that what i just said?