Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Politics v7.0 Moderation thread Politics v7.0 Moderation thread

06-07-2017 , 05:20 PM
I bet the opposite because the cheztapo's favoured son, willy-i-am, is looking at a 2 week or longer ban next time he can't control his inner imbecile, and what would P88 be without the diarrhoea?
06-07-2017 , 05:23 PM
I'm sure you could fill in for him in the diarrhoea department, jalfrezi.
06-07-2017 , 05:26 PM
BS confirmed not British thankfully, proof being having nothing in the come back department.
06-07-2017 , 05:33 PM
Speaking of come backs, you haven't answered my question in the free speech thread.
06-07-2017 , 06:03 PM
How was that?

Back on train, good timing

Sent from my XT1021 using 2+2 Forums
06-07-2017 , 06:06 PM
Out, obstructing the field.
06-07-2017 , 07:37 PM
As far as I'm concerned if I'm banned two more times I'm outta here. It'll effectively be a month then two months afterwards.

Why bother at that point. Chez bans me more often than he changes underwear so it's just a matter of time. You guys can have all the fun you want soon enough.
06-07-2017 , 07:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
And that was from a rubbish mobile while on the train. Time for a cigarette



Sent from my XT1021 using 2+2 Forums
We literally have a red coat, cigarette addicted, motorola using, ****e mod. Chez, why don't you stick to watching premier league darts with your lads and going out for "cheeky pints", because you are quite "****e" at modding.

This is what I imagine you look like.

Spoiler:
06-07-2017 , 07:47 PM
Cut him some slack Chez eats healthier than that.
06-07-2017 , 08:03 PM
Fwiw the Galaxy S8 is the best electronic device I've ever owned. Get rid of that Motorola crap Chez.
06-08-2017 , 01:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
As far as I'm concerned if I'm banned two more times I'm outta here. It'll effectively be a month then two months afterwards.

Why bother at that point. Chez bans me more often than he changes underwear so it's just a matter of time. You guys can have all the fun you want soon enough.
Personally I don't want to see you banned. You're unintentionally hilarious.
06-08-2017 , 03:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
If the rules of Pv4.2 are changing you'd better make them easier to understand, not harder.
No-on ever did guess what the Douglas Adams rule was


Disclaimer. The 'Douglas Adams rule' related posts are just for amusement
06-08-2017 , 03:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
There's has been an hiatus in some modding while we're reviewing a few things. Full service is resuming shortly

Oh thank god, we all love the wonderful service around here.
06-08-2017 , 07:35 PM
Quote:
2. The forum welcomes discussion of a wide variety of topics (current events, political issues, societal issues, philosophical issues, etc.). However, posts espousing the following viewpoints are not allowed in this forum:
white supremacy
homophobia
pro-pedophilia
misogyny
racism
bigotry towards minorities or religious groups
islamophobia
anti-semitism
hate speech
Oh wow now nobody will be able to constantly clown both of you for clearly tolerating if not outright agreeing with those viewpoints now that you've cribbed a list of things that seem to make the silly kids make stuff up to be mean and put it as a rule!

Last edited by whosnext; 06-08-2017 at 07:47 PM. Reason: deleted personal attacks on mods
06-08-2017 , 07:39 PM
It's on-topic here of course but there's a new thread specifically on the changes

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/21...anged-1670242/
06-08-2017 , 08:23 PM
personal attacks on mods and from mods itt are now banned?

also, can fly clarify that sentence with the use of a comma or something?
06-08-2017 , 08:32 PM
We will try hard to allow all criticism of the mods but OTT attacks are liable to be modded

The mods are bound by the rules as well. If we overstep then let us know.
06-08-2017 , 08:39 PM
Quote:
Last edited by whosnext; Today at 07:47 PM. Reason: deleted personal attacks on mods
So basically business as usual for Chezzfront.
06-08-2017 , 09:19 PM
any chance whoever keeps closing threads can actually leave a message saying why the threads are being closed?
06-08-2017 , 09:49 PM
I've added a note to them
06-11-2017 , 11:43 AM
Sooo...no personal attacks anymore in this place?

If so, it's a sad state of events.
06-11-2017 , 11:47 AM
I remember when this forum was explicitly intended to be where personal attacks and trolling could exist. The times, they were good.
06-11-2017 , 11:49 AM
The rules say:

Quote:
Threads will be moderated to keep them on topic and focused on the arguments/issues. Posts that focus on attacking the arguer or rehashing previous forum squabbles are not allowed.
In the new rules thread, I wrote this:

Quote:
I think obviously one of the consequences of allowing controversial viewpoints to a larger extent than P is that arguments are going to be more heated, and that's probably natural. People are going to tell you what they think of your views. I don't think the moderation in this regard is going to change very much, but I would suggest that the goal of moderation is to keep some semblance of order, and on-topic posting. There is some leeway to tell other posters exactly what you think about their views (again within the site-rules which forbid abuse, harassment, and threats...), but if threads devolve into content-less sniping between a couple of posters you can still expect to be moderated.
The upshot of all that, from my point of view, is that the point of moderation is not to go around moderating every post that expresses anger or hostility to another poster. The point is to keep threads from becoming complete ****-shows. So, no, you can't go around making dozens of posts just for the sake of calling other people *******s, with no other content. But that doesn't mean you aren't allowed to make your feelings about people and their posts pretty clear. It's more of a "stay on topic" rule than a "be extra polite" rule.
06-11-2017 , 11:53 AM
I think we might need an LC thread. I asked chez and whosnext about it just now. Any other opinions? It wouldn't be a !!! thread, but you could post about TP in it :P
06-11-2017 , 11:56 AM
I'd add to that, that keeping the anger or hostility to the issues being discussed, current posts/directly relevant older posts and the posters involved in the discussion count as part of engagement. The more people depart from that the more modding they should expect the dreaded green text or worse. (it's a re-working of the old pertinent argy bargy rule)

      
m