Baby steps. The obesity is just a symptom.

Yeah but that would be the quickest way to get banned again. In this forum, if you question the integrity of a investigation or the motives of war criminals, you are a conspiracy whacko. Meanwhile, if you call the scientific consensus on global warming a liberal hoax, this is a legitimate political opinion. So maybe it's best I stay out of regular politics for awhile.

Duker, when we getting the posting analysis? Feels like it's been awhile.

Q4 ain't over yet afaik.

I'm guessing that if/when they played poker, DIB was entirely a "feel" player who lost his ass while TheDuker knew the precise odds of every draw and nitted up a small profit. Just a wild guess.

Time for a thread title change IF YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN

My biggest poker flaw is risk aversion...bankroll nit and not pressing small edges, mostly. Think I'm too passive OOP also.

looool ducktales

Still waiting on a cliffs about you/him/ducktales.

You got something compelling brewing for us sir?

- I think deuces was a guy I beat playing poker who was wearing a duck tales shirt. Deuces claims to know who I was at a casino (wasn't hard I was a huge reg at the time).

- Told the story. Deuces goes along with it.

- Deuces claims it wasn't him afterwards.

- It was either Deuces or he was too afraid to ever introduce himself to me in a super controlled environment.

- Deuces talks **** sometimes about my poker play. My winnings dwarf his.

Actually no, Q3 thread was pretty much a bust. If anything, I'll probably just do some high-level post-count summaries.

What do you mean he went along with it...like, initially he admitted he was the duck tales guy then denied it later?

He didn't admit it, just went with it. Claimed it was a ruse later.

Reality: You said you thought that because you remembered me having a Duck Tales avatar.

I have never had any avatar.

Reality: Obnoxious douche at the poker table keeps going on about his MCAT scores to any poor soul lacking the will to tell him to STFU. I connected the two or three dots.

Though you had a bit of a weight problem I wouldn't describe you as huge.

Reality: lol no, just no.


Reality: The broken clock is right twice a day.

Reality: The above are delusions of grandeur.

Reality: I said you were a good player but a cut below the best in the room. I wouldn't go so far as to say you were second tier but flatting an early position 4 or 5X raise from the small blind with Q8 suited against an aggressive medium stack and a 100bb stacked nit isn't an expert move in most cases. I've seen you do that.

To your second point, you don't know my winnings and I don't know yours so there's that.

deuces i know my winnings, that's enough to know that mine dwarf yours.

God you people are on my jock. wtf.

Haven't stopped in here in a while, was too busy in the Garner thread. Sorry.

btw, I never defended Peterson beating his child. Apparently people can't read.

yes you did.

Somehow Wil keeps finding himself in a position where lots of people think he's saying things he's not. Wonder how that keeps happening?

This place is the jungle, but you can't die forever.

Your quarterly analyses are a beacon in an otherwise dark and dreaey sub-forum. Don't give up on potential greatness just because Q3 allegedly didn't impress as much as others.

ikes described a live poker hand involving a guy with a ducktales shirt who openlimped with 77 and claimed he was sure it was Duces for whatever reason. Without explicitly confirming or denying, Deuces went on to defend the way the hand was played and generally carried on in a way that really made it seem like he was the guy.

If Deuces really isn't the guy, he's kind of an idiot, basically. Or else he wanted us to think that was him for whatever reason.

I did not. I said repeatedly in the thread that what Peterson did was wrong. He was excessive in what he did. I said multiple times that whipping a four year old is ridiculous and I can't understand how you could physically punish a four year old.

My position in the thread was that I don't believe all people who believe in physical punishment are abusers. It was the main theme of all my posts in that thread. It was also a personal issue with a-rod's cousin, who has been quoted in this thread.

My position was abundantly clear.

You seem to have a posting style where your say things are wrong and shouldn't have happened that way but then go on to, seemingly, defend said things.