Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Other than Wil, Deuces, Proph, Johnny, NoQuarter and OMG Chez, Who are the Bad P/PU Posters? Other than Wil, Deuces, Proph, Johnny, NoQuarter and OMG Chez, Who are the Bad P/PU Posters?

10-31-2014 , 10:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexM
I don't recall that working out so well for BruceZ.
Man, BruceZ would still be in SMP teaching you kids how to find the area of a conic section if he'd stayed in SMP and hadn't foolishly entered into the 36 Chambers of 2p2 politics.
10-31-2014 , 10:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
Zeno is pretty tight with the reins on politics poasting. I guess he gets saddle sore.
How about you guys set up SMP UNCHAINED?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
I got no sympathy for these guys but that's now how this forum is supposed to work. (Alta that is)
The one great feature about UNCHAINED is that AlexM whining is confined here and not in politics main. Used to be the LC thread was just flooded with incessant whining.
10-31-2014 , 10:34 PM
I've rarely posted in the LC thread even when I was more active there.
10-31-2014 , 10:42 PM
Some Deniers are just conspiracy theorists. That's dumb, but I'm not offended. Some hate Jews, think the numbers are grossly exaggerated, that Zionists conspired with Hitler (that was the subject of Mahmoud Abbas' PhD thesis), and that the big problem was that the Germans didn't kill enough Jews. Those people are worse than offensive.
10-31-2014 , 10:46 PM
Why do you still read/post in the politics forums at all, Alex?

That's kind of a rhetorical question, since I already know the answer. It's the same reason as the rest of us, which takes a bit of the wind out of your morally superior sails.
10-31-2014 , 10:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
Ya'll keep confusing politics with unchained. Y'all want tribal sub-forums you get to pick one, but I'm ****in mutha****ing uchained so **** that. SMP unchained exists within unchained as part of the very fabric. The other Politics and SMP forums are different kinds of bread. Unchained is the ****ing bakery. So **** a doughnut or shove a croissant up your as if you want. Stick your dick in the batter and snort the flour. It's that kind of party. I guess you can even **** any animals that wander in.
People ignoring Spank are really missing out imo. Even for drunk-as-****-on-Halloween-night posting, this is Hall of Fame material.
10-31-2014 , 10:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zikzak
Why do you still read/post in the politics forums at all, Alex?

That's kind of a rhetorical question, since I already know the answer. It's the same reason as the rest of us, which takes a bit of the wind out of your morally superior sails.
Because I learn things.
10-31-2014 , 10:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexM
Because I learn things.
There are many better places and ways to learn. That's not why you're here.
10-31-2014 , 11:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie

Why else do you think I was asking you what parts were made up and what weren't?
Because you thought you found another witch before realizing it's Halloween?
10-31-2014 , 11:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zikzak
There are many better places and ways to learn. That's not why you're here.
You don't even know what I'm trying to learn.

But sure, I'm sure you know so much better than I do what my motivations are.
10-31-2014 , 11:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexM
You don't even know what I'm trying to learn.

But sure, I'm sure you know so much better than I do what my motivations are.
Yes, I think I might. People aren't that terribly complicated for the most part. If you think you're participating in something for reasons above and beyond those of everybody else, you're probably not being very honest with yourself.
10-31-2014 , 11:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Probably "flattered." If your entire criticism of the report is so narrow and specific, you can silence your critics pretty easily by actually posting a specific criticism rather than your tapdance routine.

"Some parts of the 9/11 commission report were made up."
"What? Are you a truther, too?"
"No. Check out chapter 7, section 2, 3rd paragraph. The author was a little too kind in wording his description of the actions, (really, incompetence) of his buddy at the FBI."
"Uh, ok. Is that really important?"

And we'd be done.

Why else do you think I was asking you what parts were made up and what weren't?
Yeah, you are slightly mistaken in the representation of your behaviour.

"Some parts of the 9/11 commission report were made up to a point. Doesn't mean the events did not happen as described in the report."
Not addressed to me but gladly informing the forum: "She is a truther."
Then you asked. After never having an honest discussion with me before and only attacking me.

You see a slight difference there?

So do I still sound like a LIHOP truther or can we let this go? My entire criticism of the report is so narrow and specific.
10-31-2014 , 11:37 PM
I don't think I'm doing anything above and beyond everyone else. Most people post in politics to learn. We even had a thread about that recently. It's you guys that are the exception.
11-01-2014 , 12:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by swissmiss
Yeah, you are slightly mistaken in the representation of your behaviour.

"Some parts of the 9/11 commission report were made up to a point. Doesn't mean the events did not happen as described in the report."
Not addressed to me but gladly informing the forum: "She is a truther."
Then you asked. After never having an honest discussion with me before and only attacking me.

You see a slight difference there?

So do I still sound like a LIHOP truther or can we let this go? My entire criticism of the report is so narrow and specific.
You are also misrepresenting your own posting, where you did just about anything but give a specific criticism in response to others who objected to your post before I ever got involved.
11-01-2014 , 12:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
You are also misrepresenting your own posting, where you did just about anything but give a specific criticism in response to others who objected to your post before I ever got involved.
If the extent of your criticism of the commission report is well approximated by the New Republic article, then we are done, and you aren't a truther.
11-01-2014 , 01:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
You are also misrepresenting your own posting, where you did just about anything but give a specific criticism in response to others who objected to your post before I ever got involved.
Story checks out. She makes the "offending" statement at post #20151,

Quote:
Originally Posted by swissmiss
But the records are made up to some point. That is true for the 9/11 report etc. and for the holocaust numbers. It is interesting to see how and when and why. Doesn't mean the events did not happen as described. I have a hard time understanding the scorn 9/11 truthers get for example. They could be on to something. Doesn't mean 9/11 was orchestrated by the government or some Jewish cabale. Doesn't mean they aren't annoying as ****. But their voices are still important otherwise we could just wait for government propaganda, read it and then sleep in peace.
Then she receives nothing but scorn, no questions for clarification, just a bunch of clowning around from those who went to your school of reasoned discourse. She attempts to clarify anyway, then 44 posts later at post #20195 you step in and declare her a Holocaust denier and a truther.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
It's not that. It's that she's also a Holocaust denier and a truther.
At least it's finally been worked out 500 posts later, and everyone can go back to doing the same damn thing over and over again (hopefully on a more entertaining subject) tomorrow.

Last edited by FoldnDark; 11-01-2014 at 01:23 AM. Reason: Quotes
11-01-2014 , 03:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zikzak
Why do you still read/post in the politics forums at all, Alex?

That's kind of a rhetorical question, since I already know the answer. It's the same reason as the rest of us, which takes a bit of the wind out of your morally superior sails.


You aren't supposed to say it out loud or we will all turn into sparrows or something.
11-01-2014 , 04:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
If the extent of your criticism of the commission report is well approximated by the New Republic article, then we are done, and you aren't a truther.
I barely paid attention and I picked up that she isn't representing herself a truther.

As an aside, stop quoting yourself. It makes people question your sanity a tiny bit more than if you broke up what you want to say into 2 or 3 posts without quoting anyone.

As a second aside, it is generally more socially acceptable to actually offer up an "if you are x, then sorry that I said you are y" than "if x, then oopsy." It scoops the pot even if the apology is incorrect.
11-01-2014 , 04:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTheMick2
I barely paid attention and I picked up that she isn't representing herself a truther.

As an aside, stop quoting yourself. It makes people question your sanity a tiny bit more than if you broke up what you want to say into 2 or 3 posts without quoting anyone.

As a second aside, it is generally more socially acceptable to actually offer up an "if you are x, then sorry that I said you are y" than "if x, then oopsy." It scoops the pot even if the apology is incorrect.
11-01-2014 , 05:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul D
Enjoyed the video, but I would love you trying to show any relevance in verbal terms.
11-01-2014 , 05:11 AM
And I would love if you ****ed off back to SMP and take the horse****ers with you.
11-01-2014 , 05:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul D
And I would love if you ****ed off back to SMP and take the horse****ers with you.
No need for you to go full ****** here.
11-01-2014 , 05:34 AM
hurrrrrrr durrrrrrrrrppppp
11-01-2014 , 10:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTheMick2
No need for you to go full ****** here.
I can't recall him ever avoiding that.
11-01-2014 , 10:19 AM
People who don't want to learn telling others they must have the same want, or else.

On a related note...
Is telling people they are dumb supposed to help make them smart?

If smart people don't answer dumb questions, are they expecting dumb people to inform the uninformed? That's not very smart.

      
m