Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Probably "flattered." If your entire criticism of the report is so narrow and specific, you can silence your critics pretty easily by actually posting a specific criticism rather than your tapdance routine.
"Some parts of the 9/11 commission report were made up."
"What? Are you a truther, too?"
"No. Check out chapter 7, section 2, 3rd paragraph. The author was a little too kind in wording his description of the actions, (really, incompetence) of his buddy at the FBI."
"Uh, ok. Is that really important?"
And we'd be done.
Why else do you think I was asking you what parts were made up and what weren't?
Yeah, you are slightly mistaken in the representation of your behaviour.
"Some parts of the 9/11 commission report were made up to a point. Doesn't mean the events did not happen as described in the report."
Not addressed to me but gladly informing the forum: "She is a truther."
Then you asked. After never having an honest discussion with me before and only attacking me.
You see a slight difference there?
So do I still sound like a LIHOP truther or can we let this go? My entire criticism of the report is so narrow and specific.