Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Other than Wil, Deuces, Proph, Johnny, NoQuarter and OMG Chez, Who are the Bad P/PU Posters? Other than Wil, Deuces, Proph, Johnny, NoQuarter and OMG Chez, Who are the Bad P/PU Posters?

09-06-2013 , 11:20 AM
Pretty sure dids has bigger boobs
09-06-2013 , 11:24 AM
Wow, much better than expected.
09-06-2013 , 11:29 AM
She's prettier than I am, but sadly wearing way more clothing that I do at home. I might dance on occasion, but lack the coordination and core strength for a good handstand twerk.

No candles, because I'm paranoid of fire and there are cats.

And she has a visitor, which I mean lol-no. What are those?
09-06-2013 , 11:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dids
GEAUX UL

Confirmed awful.

I can't imagine there's a post that isn't Max or pvn who is the least bit entertained by this crap. Take it to the other thread or knock it the hell off.
The butthurt it causes is pretty entertaining.
09-06-2013 , 11:43 AM
She caught fire so quick, because I think I see a liquor bottle with a shot glass on the end of the coffee table.
09-06-2013 , 01:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvn
It doesn't even matter what numbers you use here, it has nothing to do with the conversation. You shockingly missed the entire point of the fidelity web calculator post since you don't actually read anything, you decide what someone is going to say and then just blindly respond to the imaginary version in your head.
Lol....odd post for somebody who didn't respond to anything I said.

I know it doesnt matter what numbers i used there, I told you that. The difference is I think it's a good thing.
09-06-2013 , 01:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
Can I bet on one of you shutting the **** up? Because I think we could make something happen
Sure you can pay me 1k and if I ever post itt after that I'll pay you 10k.
09-06-2013 , 01:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvn
Get me to bet against exactly what I've been saying the entire thread? Yeah you really issued a put up or shut up challenge there, tough guy.
The bet was simply cutting out all our posts and asking the judges to determine which person is more clueless. Are you flip flopping now to say that you don't know what you're talking about?
09-06-2013 , 01:14 PM
well considering you refuse to even try to understand what the actual disagreement is, no.
09-06-2013 , 01:18 PM
Dids is a female? I missed that. I guess it makes sense with all the whining and complaining.
09-06-2013 , 01:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deuces McKracken
Dids is a female? I missed that. I guess it makes sense with all the whining and complaining.
Are you still a troofer?
09-06-2013 , 01:24 PM
Being a Dids gender truther is probably less stupid that the average DMcK position
09-06-2013 , 01:25 PM
Deuces McSogynist
09-06-2013 , 01:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvn
well considering you refuse to even try to understand what the actual disagreement is, no.
If I don't understand the disagreement the judges will see that and you'll win.
09-06-2013 , 01:38 PM
not the way you want to structure the bet
09-06-2013 , 01:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deuces McKracken
Dids is a female? I missed that. I guess it makes sense with all the whining and complaining.
Misogyny isn't any cooler than racism.

I am a real American boy.

09-06-2013 , 01:54 PM
I thought you had me on ignore Dids. So you are a male hypocrite bitchy type a dude. I guess we already knew that.
09-06-2013 , 01:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvn
not the way you want to structure the bet
Lol....every conversation is the same with you. It's a negotiation, pvn, why don't you think about it and come up with terms you think are more beneficial to you that i might accept and propose them? There isn't a rule against you thinking and contributing afaik.
09-06-2013 , 01:58 PM
The Deuces vs Dids saga is kinda creepy imo, seems overly personal
09-06-2013 , 02:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BluffsOften
Are you still a troofer?
I never was. My first post in that thread was to debunk the OP who tried to say some real ridiculous crap. But even he thought I was defending him as revealed in a pm lol. I would question his reading comprehension but not anyone elses. Dids et al know I am not a truther but because I don't accept their bull**** they want to smear me. This is a typical American reaction- skip the debate go straight to throwing mud. I can only blame them so much. I mean, they copy what they see and do what they are taught.
09-06-2013 , 02:00 PM
Nice didsbeard IMO.
09-06-2013 , 02:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BluffsOften
The Deuces vs Dids saga is kinda creepy imo, seems overly personal
I have the same reaction.
09-06-2013 , 02:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deuces McKracken
skip the debate go straight to throwing mud.
What debate? I asked you like five times to actually address the subject matter and you ignored it every time and kept trying to change the subject.

Edit: Just to refresh your memory.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jjshabado
1. You're actually attacking the scientific method. Sorry you have a problem with that. Maybe you shouldn't have rushed those quizzes?

2. Saying they didn't have "the evidence" is dishonest. And you know that. They didn't have 100% of all possible evidence they could have. But there was lots of other evidence - just like those videos you're talking about.

3. You're still attacking the person and not the argument. We all know its because you can't attack the argument. Where did they go wrong Deuces? How many times have I asked and how many times have you avoided the question?

Edit: And, for anyone else reading this, the NIST actually tried testing alternative hypothesizes - like the building falling from a controlled demolition. They ruled them out based on the evidence.
Bolded for your convenience.
09-06-2013 , 02:18 PM
The thing about ignoring a poster is that you still are only one click away from reading their post.

So when you see something like:

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexM
Deuces McSogynist
And learn that Deuces is adding heretofor unknown negative qualities to his playbook I take a look and then, because I find some value in calling out bigots, call out a bigot.
09-06-2013 , 02:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dessin d'enfant
Lol....every conversation is the same with you. It's a negotiation, pvn, why don't you think about it and come up with terms you think are more beneficial to you that i might accept and propose them?
there would be no point in doing this since you haven't budged one bit since the beginning of this sidetrack from your flatout wrong view of what I've said. You want to make the bet something like "is 2+2=4" and you're claiming that I think it's 5.

Quote:
There isn't a rule against you thinking and contributing afaik.

      
m