Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Other than Wil, Deuces, Proph, Johnny, NoQuarter and OMG Chez, Who are the Bad P/PU Posters? Other than Wil, Deuces, Proph, Johnny, NoQuarter and OMG Chez, Who are the Bad P/PU Posters?

09-05-2013 , 09:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvn
The type of risk pooling that DB plans impose doesn't even really help you. Max will say of course it does but he's conflating two different types of risk.
.
Clearly explain the 2 different types of risks I'm conflating with quotes of me doing it.

And you are now again going back to full ****** and denying the fact that you can save less money per person with similar chances of outliving funds if you pool? Are u still claiming to understand the definition of standard deviation?
09-05-2013 , 09:35 PM
Will you accept Sklansky as a judge?
09-05-2013 , 09:38 PM
I already said I would. I don't think he'll do it if money is involved though. I'll do it for 1k or less/under titles with 5 or so randoms from this thread as judges. I bet a lot of people will volunteer if we agree never to post about pensions again itt.

Last edited by dessin d'enfant; 09-05-2013 at 09:45 PM.
09-05-2013 , 09:44 PM
popcorn.gif
09-05-2013 , 09:46 PM
Zimmerman got so fat even his fat wife can't be married to him any longer.
09-05-2013 , 09:50 PM
Shellie Zimmerman is sporting two chins..
09-05-2013 , 09:55 PM
That's why it's funny.
09-05-2013 , 09:57 PM
The prop will never happen because you disagree on what you're disagreeing about.
09-05-2013 , 10:00 PM
Just core dump all our posts and ask who understands what is going on and who doesn't. I'll pay the judges for their time if we bet money.
09-05-2013 , 10:02 PM
I have a coin. I can judge.
09-05-2013 , 10:10 PM
Gonna go ahead and save some time. Alexm and lirva are black balled from judging.
09-05-2013 , 10:11 PM
I think I'm the only one qualified to judge anything relating to pensions.
09-05-2013 , 10:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nichlemn
The prop will never happen because you disagree on what you're disagreeing about.
The question does need to be defined.

"Does the average worker benefit more from the typical pension plan or from a typical annuity?"

A good starting point?
09-05-2013 , 10:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
The question does need to be defined.

"Does the average worker benefit more from the typical pension plan or from a typical annuity?"

A good starting point?
I think pvn is arguing that workers often benefit more from DB plans, but that's not due to an inherent advantage of DB plans, it's that for whatever reason the employees who get DB plans get bigger total compensation packages.
09-05-2013 , 10:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dessin d'enfant
Clearly explain the 2 different types of risks I'm conflating with quotes of me doing it.
Conflating was the wrong word, you're just selectively ignoring the catastrophic loss risk, which is real, as evidenced by the public pension crises in Detroit et al and ignoring the fact that the outliving the money risk isn't uniquely solved by DB plans.

Quote:
And you are now again going back to full ****** and denying the fact that you can save less money per person with similar chances of outliving funds if you pool?
LOL, I never denied this, I explicitly pointed out that your argument that you can't pool in a DC plan is wrong.


Quote:
Are u still claiming to understand the definition of standard deviation?
yes.
09-05-2013 , 10:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
The question does need to be defined.

"Does the average worker benefit more from the typical pension plan or from a typical annuity?"

A good starting point?
Not really since a lot of the benefit is subjective. A lot of people might value the flexibility a DC plan offers.
09-05-2013 , 10:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvn
Not really since a lot of the benefit is subjective. A lot of people might value the flexibility a DC plan offers.
Sure, that's where the judge comes in. It all basically boils down to EV and variance, the judge can consider that some people might trade EV for less variance to a reasonable degree.
09-05-2013 , 10:30 PM
Maybe some people might like DB plans and some people might like DC plans, and we're right back at "Is Coke or Pepsi better?"
09-05-2013 , 10:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
Sure, that's where the judge comes in. It all basically boils down to EV and variance, the judge can consider that some people might trade EV for less variance to a reasonable degree.
That's not the trade off I'm talking about. DC participants can trade money now for money later or vice versa with more ease that DB participants.

There are already ways to trade EV/variance inside a DC plan, you don't have to pick one type of plan or the other to manage that preference.
09-05-2013 , 10:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nichlemn
Maybe some people might like DB plans and some people might like DC plans, and we're right back at "Is Coke or Pepsi better?"
Nonsense. People only like DB/DC because they think they're better retirement plans. No one is going to pick DB if he thinks it's a worse plan put he "just likes DC".
09-05-2013 , 10:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nichlemn
Maybe some people might like DB plans and some people might like DC plans, and we're right back at "Is Coke or Pepsi better?"
No. You can quantify DB and DC plans.

My Financial Markets, Banking and Monetary Policy professor who worked for the Fed said DCs are the way to go because of sustainability issues with DBs. I would like to see Max and him debate the topic...
09-05-2013 , 10:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvn
That's not the trade off I'm talking about. DC participants can trade money now for money later or vice versa with more ease that DB participants.

There are already ways to trade EV/variance inside a DC plan, you don't have to pick one type of plan or the other to manage that preference.
OK. EV, variance and flexibility are things the judge can consider. A reasonable judge can decide how much the average worker desires flexibility.
09-05-2013 , 10:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul D
No. You can quantify DB and DC plans.

My Financial Markets, Banking and Monetary Policy professor who worked for the Fed said DCs are the way to go because of sustainability issues with DBs. I would like to see Max and him debate the topic...
"Better" as in better for the individual worker or better for society overall?
09-05-2013 , 10:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
"Better" as in better for the individual worker or better for society overall?
I assume he was talking about better for society.
09-05-2013 , 10:47 PM
lol penisons.

      
m