Other than Wil, Deuces, Proph, Johnny, NoQuarter and OMG Chez, Who are the Bad P/PU Posters? - Page 1349 - Politics version 7.0 -- Two Plus Two Poker Forums

Two Plus Two Forums Archived Forums Archived Other Topics Politics version 7.0

Other than Wil, Deuces, Proph, Johnny, NoQuarter and OMG Chez, Who are the Bad P/PU Posters?

...

Page 1349 of 1418

First

349 849 1149 1249 1299 1329 1339 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1359 1369 1399

Last

Page 1349 of 1418

First

349 849 1149 1249 1299 1329 1339 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1359 1369 1399

Last

09-20-2015 , 04:16 PM

#33701

SenorKeeed

mew mew mew

Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 37,478

wtf are you talking about bro? I never get banned.

09-20-2015 , 04:25 PM

#33702

Gamblor

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 14,746

Quote:

Originally Posted by SenorKeeed

wtf are you talking about bro? I never get banned.

Nobody said you got banned, bro

09-20-2015 , 04:40 PM

#33703

SenorKeeed

mew mew mew

Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 37,478

Right, but if I was a disruptive moron, I'd get banned. But I don't.

09-20-2015 , 04:43 PM

#33704

ikestoys

banned

Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 94,424

lol remember when you tried?

09-20-2015 , 04:47 PM

#33705

SenorKeeed

mew mew mew

Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 37,478

When I tried in the bad poaster thread? Of course not.

09-20-2015 , 06:27 PM

#33706

The REAL Trolly

old hand

Join Date: Mar 2014 Posts: 1,603

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tien

Fighting for the rights for women to wear burkas is being on the wrong side of liberalism.

Tien

09-20-2015 , 06:42 PM

#33707

Roonil Wazlib

veteran

Join Date: Feb 2014 Posts: 3,333

That's definitely one of liberalism's sticky wickets. It's hard to square the circle of religious freedom + pro-women + subjugation of women (by choice? Not sure if possible)

09-20-2015 , 07:31 PM

#33708

FoldnDark

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 11,930

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roonil Wazlib

That's definitely one of liberalism's sticky wickets. It's hard to square the circle of religious freedom + pro-women + subjugation of women (by choice? Not sure if possible)

Are you Low Key?

09-20-2015 , 08:28 PM

#33709

The REAL Trolly

old hand

Join Date: Mar 2014 Posts: 1,603

I think grownups should be allowed to dress themselves. Not seeing any sticky wickets here.

09-20-2015 , 08:38 PM

#33710

BrianTheMick2

Long way to go and a short time to get there.

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 19,430

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roonil Wazlib

That's definitely one of liberalism's sticky wickets. It's hard to square the circle of religious freedom + pro-women + subjugation of women (by choice? Not sure if possible)

You find each of these to be dichotomous?

09-20-2015 , 08:42 PM

#33711

ikestoys

banned

Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 94,424

Quote:

Originally Posted by The REAL Trolly

I think grownups should be allowed to dress themselves. Not seeing any sticky wickets here.

The obvious counter is that grown ups should be able to dress themselves without threats of violence from their family and social group.

09-20-2015 , 08:47 PM

#33712

microbet

Solar Powered

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 57,077

Quote:

Originally Posted by ikestoys

The obvious counter is that grown ups should be able to dress themselves without threats of violence from their family and social group.

Of course. That would be illegal. I'm confident that you don't think it should be illegal for a woman to wear a burqa if she chooses.

09-20-2015 , 08:59 PM

#33713

Roonil Wazlib

veteran

Join Date: Feb 2014 Posts: 3,333

how choosy of a choice is it if it's "a choice", but not really because you'd be alienated from your family/society/etc?

09-20-2015 , 09:07 PM

#33714

ikestoys

banned

Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 94,424

Quote:

Originally Posted by microbet

Of course. That would be illegal. I'm confident that you don't think it should be illegal for a woman to wear a burqa if she chooses.

I come down on the side of let adults do what they want, but it is an issue I can easily see the other side of. Tien and Low Key are far from making absurd points, and Trolly is ****ing stupid to get all pissy about a reasonable position in this thread. Fits right in with how bad posting equals disagreeing with him.... something I pointed out earlier if you remember.

09-20-2015 , 09:11 PM

#33715

The REAL Trolly

old hand

Join Date: Mar 2014 Posts: 1,603

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roonil Wazlib

how choosy of a choice is it if it's "a choice", but not really because you'd be alienated from your family/society/etc?

Sucky situation, but outlawing clothing styles isn't the answer.

09-20-2015 , 09:28 PM

#33716

BrianTheMick2

Long way to go and a short time to get there.

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 19,430

Quote:

Originally Posted by microbet

Of course. That would be illegal. I'm confident that you don't think it should be illegal for a woman to wear a burqa if she chooses.

I am going to go on the side of equating ethical with legal as being problematic.

09-20-2015 , 10:09 PM

#33717

SmokeyQ123

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 6,583

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roonil Wazlib

how choosy of a choice is it if it's "a choice", but not really because you'd be alienated from your family/society/etc?

Agree with ikes, I can totally see this and used to argue the same. In the end I think all you can do is provide people with an environment where they can make their own choice. It is fairly interesting where exactly you would draw the line though, and how much abuse and damage can be behind a behaviour/desire before taking the right for it away.

Also yeah, tien is pretty bad.

09-20-2015 , 10:11 PM

#33718

SmokeyQ123

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 6,583

Also roonil, are you Low Key? I've been pretty mad at 'him' for stealing your avatar since I haven't adjusted yet and still think it's you every time 'he' posts.

09-20-2015 , 10:14 PM

#33719

ikestoys

banned

Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 94,424

yes that's him. harry potter reference and the same avatar. It's him.

09-20-2015 , 10:17 PM

#33720

Roonil Wazlib

veteran

Join Date: Feb 2014 Posts: 3,333

I don't want to get banned, but Voldemort's avada kedavra being reflected back at him was massively beneficial to the European wizarding community.

09-20-2015 , 10:21 PM

#33721

ikestoys

banned

Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 94,424

wookie has not made it clear if celebrating accidental suicide of a possibly fictional character is ok.

Can we get a ruling wookie?

09-21-2015 , 05:30 AM

#33722

BrianTheMick2

Long way to go and a short time to get there.

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 19,430

I'm not one to post snarky posts, but...

09-21-2015 , 08:14 AM

#33723

Jbrochu

banned

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 16,054

lol

09-21-2015 , 08:17 AM

#33724

chezlaw

Limey Bastard

Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 47,813

I didn't get where I am today without making obscure references to popular culture.

09-21-2015 , 08:42 AM

#33725

Gamblor

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 14,746

Quote:

Originally Posted by SenorKeeed

Right, but if I was a disruptive moron, I'd get banned. But I don't.

SenorKeeed thinks his drive-by LC posts aren't disruptive and moronic. Hilarious.

Page 1349 of 1418

First

349 849 1149 1249 1299 1329 1339 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1359 1369 1399

Last

...

Page 1349 of 1418

First

349 849 1149 1249 1299 1329 1339 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1359 1369 1399

Last