This is just obvious nonsense.

The only thing SJWs have "lower" is maturity. Most people learn to stop being a self-righteous virtue signalling **** when they grow out of that horrible phase of adolescence.

For some reason the SJW just stays permenantly trapped in that obnoxious 14-year old mode forever.

The overall idea is that sjws are mostly life losers. Again, I agree.

OK Everyone!. I'm not convinced we need two content thread on SJWs but we have them so stick to the rules please.

Well, well. Sometimes it pays off to watch these stupid youtoobz because they illustrate certain points so well.

I took a look at this one:

And the first video I find had this lovely title:

The Race War Behind The Daniel Holtzclaw Trial

I recalled the name. He was a half-white/half-asian Oklahoma cop who had been convicted of forcing sex and sodomy on 13 victims (correction: convicted for assaults on 8 of 13 accusers), all black. He was busted after forcing a 57 year old grandmother to expose herself and to perform oral sex on him. Here's his wikipedia article:

I know that LordJvK was worried about SJWs raising an alarm, and let me assure you, I am raising that alarm. This video is incredibly racist. So ****ing racist. She claims the prosecution didn't have any evidence. That is true--if you think the statements of 13 black women are not evidence. (Actually, it's not true, the GPS location of the squad car confirms the victims stories, as does Holtzclaw looking them up in the police computer.) She weaves a conspiracy theory that the two detectives investigating the case wanted to get famous--or something, it's quite insane. She tells lies about the evidence ("most of the victims said they were assaulted by a short, black male"), she deceptively edits video to imply that the detectives are attempting to force the women to accuse Holtzclaw.

This is someone you put forward as an Anti-SJW? Well, this is a racist. You will cast so many votes for Trump over that accusation, but apologizing for convicted rapists because the victims are black is some atrocious ****ing ****. Lying about it is worse. I see no reason to play nice with people like Diane Davison.

Now, maybe LordJvK didn't know she was a racist. Maybe her other videos are....better? I don't know. As a tolerant liberal I am forced to give him the benefit of the doubt.

I will only speak for and defend my own videos, and not those of others.

As I've said there is a continuum of people who come out against SJWs. I was simply pointing out that it is not true that all of them are white men.

I will not engage the specifics of this case because, simply put, it is nothing I care about and nothing to do with me.

The only point that mattered was that Diane is not a man.

gruncing,

the fun part is the focus is almost entirely on people without any real power.

that talk show clown people here liked opened with at story about people on twitter being mean. similarly much of the focus is on campus demonstrations which are equally powerless. or on tumblr feminists. actual centrist/leftist SJW politicians, the ones that have real power and represent people, basically do nothing wrong and are rarely the focus at all.

meanwhile people that talk about a regressive left ignore* that rightwing politicians are want to prevent minorities from voting, women from getting abortions, immigrants from moving, and would love to throw people in jail at insane rates.

the liberal movement doesnt have to focus all it's energy on the breitbart comments section or people calling for genocide on twitter because they have actual real issues where they're fighting for basic human rights.

When people are sacked from their jobs or have their lives ruined by these people, they have power.

no they dont

Fair enough. But this Diana Davison person illustrates something I pointed out earlier--an awful lot of Anti-SJWs are straight up racists.

Do an experiment for me.

1. Get someone falsely to report you to HR for being racist at work

2. See what happens with that.

3. Come back and tell me if you have experienced the force of institutional power.

I don't know about you, but when I was 14 I was about as close to the opposite of a "sjw" as you can be.

You mean like J.Fogel? He was a target of these dastardly SJWers and got fired by Subway Inc. Or... are the executives of Subway Inc the SJWers because they're the ones who actually gave him the boot. Or... are the shareholders of Subway Inc the real SJWers, as this all happened on their watch. It's all so confusing.

So sad that the term 'SJW' doesn't describe a coherent set of human beans. It's so zannen. But so it goes when there's conspiracy theories afoot.

Look Shame Trolley, if you want to be an SJW, knock yourself out. Best of luck with actualising the better society you are fighting for.

If you are an SJW, I think all of your tactics are ineffectual, breed resentment, promote hysteria, and quash genuine free speech and discussion.

If you have a coherent counter-argument to that, then show me that argument. At the moment, you are just trolling.

Neo-Goreans aren't SJWers. /QED.

No, I'm not trolling. And no, I'm not 'arguing' with you. I've also already explained this to you. I'm using you as an example.

What you are demonstrating is that you can't describe a coherent set of IRL peeps using your 'SJW' term. That, and you'll go to loltastical lengths to do avoid doing so. Case in point: let's discuss who these SJWers were that got J.Fogel fired. Was it the Subway Inc Execs? Was it the Subway Inc shareholders? The above are two very simple yes|no questions. You could answer them with 5-7 characters, counting a space. But...

You won't. Instead you'll waste way more than 5-7 characters avoiding making any coherent response at all. You're just continually stymied by this complete inability to describe even the simplest details about this something, this something where you claim special insight, and this something you keep urgently insisting is really important for everyone else to understand ASAP.

Just like peeps peddling other conspiracy theories.

See the two videos quoted in this post for me pointing to specific examples of ineffectual SJW-ism.

This is why it is annoying having two threads, by the way. Have to keep posting across. It is a nonsense.

I didn't ask about the effectualness, or lack thereof, of these SJWers. I was simply asking who these SJWers might happen to be. We know in this case the SJWers were quite effectual, as they got J.Fogel fired... which we've learned is what SJWers do. Here's a simple question:

Were the Subway Inc execs, the folks that actually gave J.Fogel the boot, these effectual SJWers? This is a simple yes|no question. One you could answer in 2-3 keystrokes. But...

See, here's the thing. I don't know if I'm a SJWer right now. How can I tell? What would have to be true about me for me to be properly classified as a SJWer? That's what I keep asking you... who may these dastardly SJWers happen to be ??

OK, assuming I'm not already a SJWer, and I also wanted to become a SJWer... what would I have to change about myself to actually become one ??

Some things you could do to become an SJW:

- Obnoxiously tell people they are racist and make a big deal about it.
- Orchestrate twitter campaigns against small game development studios to remove potentially offensive jokes such as this from their games:



Aggressively pressure them until they change it.
- Stop people with whom you disagree speaking at public events.
- Accuse anyone who disagrees with the above of being whatever "-ist" prejudice you think fits best.

Good luck.

IRL or anonymously on the interwebs? IRL I discourage racists from talking to me. I try not to be obnoxious about it. Racists can be dangerous folk sometimes, and it's best not to rile them up.

I don't twittergram.

Rut row, I've done that before...


Well, I called those who were pro-WTO a buncha -ists... "capitalists" to be specific. I think it fits best.

So how did I do? Is 2/4 good enough to be a SJWer? Or do I need 4/4?

I don't know how any rational person can believe this.

We literally can't agree on the most basic fact in this argument.

I'm curious who your target audience is for these video series you're making. I would think you would want it be SJWs themselves. Is that right? If so, do you think they've been effectual? Have they not bred resentment towards you?

The typical mode on youtube is for anti-SJWs to post clips of SJWs and mock them.

In my videos, I outlined the core ideas of the theories behind SJWs and asked people if they really think these things.

Actual SJWs probably never watched, such is life.

This is a good summation of this whole "who are the SJWers?" mystery. But I hear the truth is out there... the truth is out there...

No. I can't imagine anyone would watch videos where you create straw man arguments as you've done ITF.

13ball has shown himself to be an SJW and a partisan shill.

I'm building up a list of known SJWs on this forum for reference, so I know I can safely ingore everything they say.