Does thinking about gays having sex together make you sick to your stomach?

No. I don't care. Cuckoldry does not bother me either.

I just like pointing out how much you are defenders of actual cuckoldry. It makes me chuckle.

I defend the fetish too. But I still think it's a stunning analogy for political positions that actively put the interests of other countries ahead of your own country's.

Your words mean things when you use them.

Peodophilia seems like an obvious analogy for many positions on the right.

Just ****ing/exploiting/projecting force over those less powerful than yourself in order to satisfy/reach your own goals.

Maybe necrophilia.

Or even Kleptophilia which is when you cant achieve sexual arousal without the act or simulated act of theft.

Did I defend it? I don't care what other people do with their organs and who they do it with.
That stuff isn't my business.

You think it is an apt analogy because it is a hip word among cretinous teenagers at the moment.

No, it's an apt analogy because making decisions for the benefit for other countries at the expense of your own country and feeling good about that fact is much like getting off from watching your wife have sex with another man.

Spouse-swappers aren't slaves.

I don't understand that post, or its relevance.

But how is a guy into cuckolding losing out on anything?

He's not. And if you are into giving other people things at the expense of your own needs and wants, that's all fine and dandy.

But understand that not everyone has the same fetish you do.

I generally don't care what fetish/kinks people have as long as they aren't hurting anyone.

So, to understand the metaphor do I need to have a disdain for its practitioners? Maybe that's the problem.

A well-researched post, sir.

If the guy isn't losing anything then how is an analogy for benefiting someone at your own expense?

Poo Poo Eatin'

Well, it isn't.

It's pretty obvious you like the term because it's juvenile and it portrays those whom you deem your enemies as weak.

At heart your whole position on this "cuck" phenomenon is very right wing. Paleoconservatives and the far right consider helping others as weak.

But let's just bring this metaphor to specifics here.

Letting another man have sex with your wife while you watch is the same as...

?
Taking in refugees from countries experiencing civil war.
Allowing legal immigration for skilled labor.
Allowing a pathway to citizenship for undocumented aliens who have been present in the country and who haven't committed any crimes.
Giving aid to foreign countries.
Signing agreements to encourage free trade.
Something else?

I feel so out of the loop on obscure fetishes.

You have a mighty big mountain to climb if you want to be taken seriously on issues like international trade and foreign relations and policies.

Embedded in the word cuck is the obvious and old racial fear of a minority sleeping with a white woman who are implicitly either the property of white men or in need of being protected from minorities by white men. That's why pro immigration conservatives were considered cucks because they were letting more Hispanics and Muslims in who would then have the opportunity to sleep with their girlfriends and wives.

Let's just take a second for all of us, no matter what side you are on, to realize that we have a serious issue on how we use words. Look at the above, the bolded. Now look at the definition below.

cuck·old
1. the husband of an adulteress, often regarded as an object of derision.

1.
(of a man) make (another man) a cuckold by having a sexual relationship with his wife.
(of a man's wife) make (her husband) a cuckold.

Notice the difference between the term (and lack of race in the definition) and how each person uses it. One person may imply someone being a beta male, while one implies someone being a racist.

We have a real problem with how we define words, and therefore define people. Is calling someone a "cuck" the equivalent of saying someone is scared of his white wife having sex with a minority? Which race, in which country, and why? If you were in Africa, what color skin of the male would be the "cuck"?

We are far apart in the way we use words, and I think that's why we as a society right now are so far apart in how we view each other. Where do we draw any type of line?

I don't like to single people out, but since you made this claim I have to ask you something specifically. If you were white and let your white wife have sex in front of you with another white man, would you describe it as a "fantasy", or as a "cuckold" situation?

Defend your position, and then I'd like to ask you why the word "minority" is in your original post?

Who is the person being truly racist here? I'm Asian, my wife is Asian, and I wouldn't be more or less happier if another Asian man had sex with my wife over a(n) "insert race here" male.

You are implying that all of us reading your post, as men, have a problem with a BLACK/HISPANIC/MUSLIM (which isn't a race) man having sex with our women. No. I have a problem with ANY man of ANY race having sex with my woman. What the **** does color have to do with it?

You seem to differentiate between being a beta male and being a racist but the racial overtones intensify the beta male status, they don't differentiate it, which is why it has such an implicit punch. Of course it doesn't have to have racist intent but I'd be remiss if I didn't point out the racial overtones in its modern origin in political usage

https://www.google.com/amp/www.ibtim...android-att-us

You've done nothing to answer my question. YOU are the one who threw race into it. If my wife had sex with another woman or an inanimate object it would devastate me psychologically, which is what I think a "cuck" is. What does the race of the person she cheats on me have to do with it?

YOU threw in race, not me. I wouldn't feel better if she humiliated me by cheating on me with another person of my own race, or of a "minority" race. Would YOU? Defend your argument.

I did in what I added in. I said it doesn't have to have racist intent but the origin of its modern usage, from the porn genre that has racist overtones to an alt right that usually places emphasis on macho posturing and white male dominance over minorities paints a picture of the racial overtones infused in the modern usage whether or not that's how you use it.

No, dude. That doesn't work. I looked up the word cuckold, posted it for all to see, and the word "minority" wasn't in the ****ing definition. YOU threw in race, NOT ME. Again, YOU used the word "minority". Why did you do that? Because YOU have a perception of a person of a perceived lesser value (a "minority") is humiliating because they are having sex with "your" white woman?

See, this is the problem we have. I don't mean to pick on you but YOU are the one coming off racist here. I don't give a flying **** if some big dicked midget black man or a small dicked Yao Ming looking mfer ****ed my wife. YOUR SIDE throws in race. Race has NOTHING to do with it, yet that's all you people can talk about.

If my wife left me for an Asian woman I wouldn't walk around bragging about how happy I am she left me for an Asian lesbian over a "minority" male.

Think about things before you throw them out in the public forum. YOU are the one who has some hangup over a "minority" man having sex with a WHITE woman. The only thing I care about is who has sex with MY wife, who HAPPENS to be Asian.