Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Liberal Priviledge and the lies of the left Liberal Priviledge and the lies of the left

07-08-2014 , 02:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Proph
I hope you guys eventually realize which side of history you're currently on. It's never too late to change. The modern order of round-ups seems to be drug users, tax evaders, and minorities. Soon, it will be dissenters. The State cannot tolerate dissent, especially during times of (perpetual) war which it has created.

Who doesn't know about the internment of the Japanese during World War II? I suppose many of you believe similar incidents won't happen again, and I can only chalk that up to ignorance on history.
It will be simpler in AC land though, it will just be the poors.
07-08-2014 , 02:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Proph
The 5th amendment applies to crypto-keys.

Though, good luck finding a judge that understands Bitcoin (or encryption, for that matter).

Even with the public blockchain, it would be difficult for them to decipher enough evidence to clamp down on one person, let alone many.
Good luck finding an employer who will pay you in bitcoins under the table.
07-08-2014 , 02:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kurto
or maybe they realized their ideas weren't sensible and changed their tune. But assuming their in prison is probably a great guess.
Doubtful. Most libertarians and anarchist don't return to the absurd once they break themselves from it. You can't help but agree with the prison assumption, considering the growing, militarized police state.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kurto
actually, no one here sounds anything at all like you describe. Nor, do I suspect, are people ignorant of the internment of the Japanese.

You just sound a little nutty.
Really? You think I sound nutty because I think history might repeat itself, but there's no example of anyone participating in this thread that thinks otherwise?

Can't argue with that!

Cult of MissileDog.
07-08-2014 , 02:44 PM
It's almost as if society evolved out of a state of anarchy and decided having a centralized government was the way to go.

But Proph? Nah, he's still cheerleading for team feudalism.
07-08-2014 , 02:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
Good luck finding an employer who will pay you in bitcoins under the table.
Did the thought of self employment never occur to you?
07-08-2014 , 02:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeImBetter
It's almost as if society evolved out of a state of anarchy and decided having a centralized government was the way to go.

But Proph? Nah, he's still cheerleading for team feudalism.
Rights came before governments.

Governments are supposedly there to protect your rights, but the mechanism is always abused by sociopaths that eventually and inevitably gain power.
07-08-2014 , 02:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Proph
Doubtful. Most libertarians and anarchist don't return to the absurd once they break themselves from it. You can't help but agree with the prison assumption, considering their intense dislike of all laws not pertaining to property protection.
FYP
07-08-2014 , 02:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cerveza69
Ok.. as promised here is the first Libtard Liar to be profiled...the one, the only the aptly named- Anthony Weiner.

This compulsive liberal liar can't help himself when it comes to sending out inappropriate texts and tweets, often including pictures of his private parts. But, let's go back to the beginning....

In 1991, he won a controversial election by stoking the racial tensions of the time. This was chronicled by a Liberal talking head for Salon. You can find the link here:
http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/anthony_weiner_1991/

He was a jerk to work for, having one of the highest staff turnovers as a result of his constant yelling at staffers, throwing furniture etc.

In 2010, (in typical Liberal fashion) after dressing down UN dignitaries for unpaid parking tickets, it was revealed that he himself had unpaid parking tickets three years in arrears in excess of $2000.00. He quickly paid them after the report was published in Roll Call.

In 2011, he tweeted a photo of his crotch to the twitter universe. Then he claimed his account was hacked, and enrolled the entire Liberal Media machine to defend him and attack Andrew Breitbart for breaking the story. You can see MSNBC's Rachel Maddow vigorously defend Weiner and even offer up "vast right wing conspiracy" theories here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dACOcUM2_1c

Maddow's vigorous defense of Weiner was somewhat comical, especially since it was obvious to everyone that he was lying. He also went on her show that evening and a "lying tour" of MSNBC programs that night repeating the lies about his account being hacked. Well, we all know that he admitted lying a few days later and left Congress kicking and screaming (he was forced out by Pelosi.)

You can see friend Jon Stewart's takedown of him here:

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/new...-friend-195216
In 2013, he ran for Mayor of New York, when it was exposed that he was sexting women half his age under the name "Carlos Danger". (You can't make this stuff up) You would have thought he would have learned his lesson after losing his Congressional seat. This time he refused to back out of the race for Mayor. When he lost the primary with less than 5% of the vote he flipped off the Media when asked what he would do next. What a Classless idiot.

There's a lot more I can say here about him, but I just haven't the time.
Weiner is a weenie. If you thought you had a lot of dirt and water-carrying material for Weiner, research Pelosi or Reid.
07-08-2014 , 02:57 PM
Proph is another strong candidate to join Silverman as a victim of a cryptocurrency scam

Cerveza, I don't think a guy drummed out of politics is really a great example of what you want to be posting here.
07-08-2014 , 02:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Proph
Did the thought of self employment never occur to you?
To be honest I assumed it's the only way you could get a job, at least a job that involved talking to the person doing the hiring.
07-08-2014 , 03:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Proph
Rights came before governments.

Governments are supposedly there to protect your rights, but the mechanism is always abused by sociopaths that eventually and inevitably gain power.
Well, I value my right to a sense of safety, and appreciate the laws in place which definitely do discourage DUIs and the discharging of weapons in public.

I value my civil rights and appreciate having laws in place which definitely do mitigate racism, sexism, and other oppressive forces.

I value my right to making a living wage, and appreciate the laws in place which definitely do allow for this to happen.

If magically we all suddenly teleported to Libtopia, none of the above would be true any longer. People would be discharging fully automatic weapons in the streets without concern of reprimand (so long as potted plants weren't shattered), we would be back to enduring 19th century (contemporary 3rd world) labor conditions, and we would be all envious of how fair and balanced things were during the days of Don Draper.

For someone who reveres the lessons history can teach us, it's strange you conveniently forget the reasons why the laws you detest originally came to be.
07-08-2014 , 03:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Proph
You attempted to explain your ideology in another thread, but your beliefs fell apart during probing.

According to your philosophy, governments already own your income before you recieve it because they "create" "taxable events". Although, you fail to understand that taxation is nothing more than wealth redistribution; wealth is never actually created. Could you point me to a website that would help me better understand taxable events, as you describe them, sophiwookie?
No website is needed to explain reality. For example, Whenever someone buys something and pays sale tax, they have created a taxable event. The tax created by these taxable events are usually held by the merchant until the appointed time they are due to the government.

Whatever personal belief you have about redistribution and wealth has nothing to do with the factual reality of how taxation works.


Quote:

From my understanding, you were implying that since governments are responsible for infrastructure, they allowed for the contracts between people to take place, and are thus owed compensation. You seemed to assume that people are feeble, and wouldn't otherwise find ways of working together freely, for some reason. Not to mention when governments "create" infrastructure, they usually just hire private entities to do the work for them with taxpayers' dollars. (And usually, they overpay for an inferior product via cronyism, to boot!)

In short, you believe people work for the government, instead of themselves. Yet, this isn't socialist or communist in your eyes. Odd.

If I accidentally misinterpreted you, please clarify. Berating and insults are easier, though; aren't they, spank?
I doubt you have accidentally done anything here. This is just more accusation and deception, which is par for course behavior for a political operative such as you. It's cute that you attempt to frame it as misunderstanding and misinterpretation. Playing the innocent isn't going to work well for you either. Do not mistake observation and confrontation of your behavior for insults and berating.

Don't forget I have read your playbook and have been inside your cult. You lost the game before you even started playing and I'm not even playing a game.
07-08-2014 , 03:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeImBetter
FYP
What's so wrong about governments staying within their duty to protect people's lives, liberty, and property, DudeImBettE? Why do you limit the "fix" to just property?

Is it because property rights violations are the foot in the door that allows violations of your other rights to happen later? You may be smarter than I give you credit for!
07-08-2014 , 03:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
No website is needed to explain reality. For example, Whenever someone buys something and pays sale tax, they have created a taxable event. The tax created by these taxable events are usually held by the merchant until the appointed time they are due to the government.

Whatever personal belief you have about redistribution and wealth has nothing to do with the factual reality of how taxation works.




I doubt you have accidentally done anything here. This is just more accusation and deception, which is par for course behavior for a political operative such as you. It's cute that you attempt to frame it as misunderstanding and misinterpretation. Playing the innocent isn't going to work well for you either. Do not mistake observation and confrontation of your behavior for insults and berating.

Don't forget I have read your playbook and have been inside your cult. You lost the game before you even started playing and I'm not even playing a game.
Notice that you didn't clarify ANYTHING. Your description seems like basically what I described, except shorter, with smaller words, and without acknowledging the problems. It also appears you're substituting "taxable event" for "contract".

What compels the merchants to hand over those taxes?

I'm sorry, but I've never been a member of the Cult of MissileDog. Ideas have to make sense to me before I accept them. Please, help me understand further:

What compels the merchants to hand over those taxes?
07-08-2014 , 03:26 PM
A quick word on the alcohol related traffic fatalities. I always thought that was DUI level 0.08. No so. It is 0.01
http://www.nhtsa.gov/people/injury/r...nd_&_intro.htm

I would sure like to know what the number is without everyone who had 1 beer is......
07-08-2014 , 03:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeImBetter
Well, I value my right to a sense of safety, and appreciate the laws in place which definitely do discourage DUIs and the discharging of weapons in public.

I value my civil rights and appreciate having laws in place which definitely do mitigate racism, sexism, and other oppressive forces.

I value my right to making a living wage, and appreciate the laws in place which definitely do allow for this to happen.

If magically we all suddenly teleported to Libtopia, none of the above would be true any longer. People would be discharging fully automatic weapons in the streets without concern of reprimand (so long as potted plants weren't shattered), we would be back to enduring 19th century (contemporary 3rd world) labor conditions, and we would be all envious of how fair and balanced things were during the days of Don Draper.

For someone who reveres the lessons history can teach us, it's strange you conveniently forget the reasons why the laws you detest originally came to be.
"Right to sense of safety"? "Civil rights"? "Right to work"?

All while struggling with unintended consequences, still?

And of course, abolishing oppressive governments means we lose all technological advancements.

I don't have enough time to correct all of your misconceptions.
07-08-2014 , 03:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LASJayhawk
A quick word on the alcohol related traffic fatalities. I always thought that was DUI level 0.08. No so. It is 0.01
http://www.nhtsa.gov/people/injury/r...nd_&_intro.htm

I would sure like to know what the number is without everyone who had 1 beer is......
As long as DudeImBettE feels as if he has a "sense of safety". We should all be willing to sacrifice of our freedoms for this lofty goal!

These Obama-youths are terrifying.
07-08-2014 , 03:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Proph
Notice that you didn't clarify ANYTHING. Your description seems like basically what I described, except shorter, with smaller words, and without acknowledging the problems. It also appears you're substituting "taxable event" for "contract".

What compels the merchants to hand over those taxes?

I'm sorry, but I've never been a member of the Cult of MissileDog. Ideas have to make sense to me before I accept them. Please, help me understand further:

What compels the merchants to hand over those taxes?
Jeebus, just come out and say it already so we can laugh at you for it.
07-08-2014 , 03:37 PM
Barry is begging for more loot again after making a problem worse.

Maybe Obama is going to vacation in Laredo and El Paso this year so he can get a first-person account of things?

http://news.yahoo.com/obama-seeks-3-...-politics.html
07-08-2014 , 03:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LASJayhawk
A quick word on the alcohol related traffic fatalities. I always thought that was DUI level 0.08. No so. It is 0.01
http://www.nhtsa.gov/people/injury/r...nd_&_intro.htm

I would sure like to know what the number is without everyone who had 1 beer is......
No, its not a DUI if you drive at 0.01. Read the link again.
07-08-2014 , 03:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MickeyB105
Barry is begging for more loot again after making a problem worse.

Maybe Obama is going to vacation in Laredo and El Paso this year so he can get a first-person account of things?

http://news.yahoo.com/obama-seeks-3-...-politics.html
What is your preferred cost free solution? This is definitely a real problem, so Im interested in any cheap way to solve it.
07-08-2014 , 03:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
Jeebus, just come out and say it already so we can laugh at you for it.
lol! You went out of your way to delete the emphasis. That must've been very time consuming.

Of course you want to avoid the crux of the issue.

You seem to know, kerowo. Why don't you answer? This is usually the point in the conversation where sophiwookie leaves, anyway.

What compels the merchants to hand over those taxes?
07-08-2014 , 03:47 PM
Anyone want to bet against Proph drunk and driving regularly?
07-08-2014 , 03:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsGambool
What is your preferred cost free solution? This is definitely a real problem, so Im interested in any cheap way to solve it.
Let them stay, but get rid of the Welfare system and job killing legislation/regulations.

Problem solved.
07-08-2014 , 03:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LASJayhawk
A quick word on the alcohol related traffic fatalities. I always thought that was DUI level 0.08. No so. It is 0.01
http://www.nhtsa.gov/people/injury/r...nd_&_intro.htm

I would sure like to know what the number is without everyone who had 1 beer is......
Well dickhead, it's in the next ****ing clause of the sentence:

Quote:
38.6% at .01 or higher, 30% at .10 or higher. Illegal BAC .08 or .10, depending on state (1998)
Keep showing that background in "science!"

      
m