Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
ITT we declare which trolls/morons/attention whores we are no longer feeding ITT we declare which trolls/morons/attention whores we are no longer feeding

01-02-2015 , 08:22 PM
yup, so the story goes
01-02-2015 , 08:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeImBetter
Duker needs to study the posting frequency of those being shunned, both before and after shunning, to see how effective the strategy is. I'm actually expecting it's moderately effective.

According to the shame and shun political theory, we shouldn't be here at all until we have repented our "sins" such as disagreeing with really dumb theories of human social order based on mob-based shunning and shaming.

Since it is a failure, the shaming shunners are left holding the content of their method, looking like peens exposed to returned criticism from any flank.
01-02-2015 , 08:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDuker
This thread was started on 10/16 and OP named 3 posters:
Code:
+-------------------+--------------+--------------+
| Posting Frequency (posts/day in P + PU)         |
+-------------------+--------------+--------------+
|poster             |  before 10/16|   after 10/16|
+-------------------+--------------+--------------+
|ikestoys           |         23.31|         17.57|
|DudeImBetter       |          8.55|         10.95|
|spanktehbadwookie  |         15.31|         12.69|
+-------------------+--------------+--------------+
So apparently it works for everybody but you.
Can you look at how often they are quoted before and after?
01-02-2015 , 08:52 PM
Sorry, the quoting analysis was specific to Q2, so I don't have the whole year of quoting data collected and separated out.
01-02-2015 , 08:54 PM
Well you should get on that
01-02-2015 , 09:18 PM
Safe to assume less quotes. I mean, what % of posts ITF are by the shunners ITT? Believe Duker analyzed this once upon a time. Weren't like 95% of posts in P/PU made by < 20 posters?
01-02-2015 , 09:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeImBetter
Wasn't a life event to blame for Ikes' dip in posting frequency...maybe residency?
If he was in residency I doubt he'd ever be posting. Don't they work like 80hr weeks?
01-02-2015 , 10:11 PM
IDK, the dude posts 67 times a day thru med school...think he'd find a way.
01-03-2015 , 12:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDuker
Sorry, the quoting analysis was specific to Q2, so I don't have the whole year of quoting data collected and separated out.
Is there a way we can do this analysis on our owns, so we're not always asking you to do it for us? Or is it too complicated for laypeople?
01-05-2015 , 09:13 AM
Embargoing Ikestoys.
01-05-2015 , 09:21 AM
I've found a good formula for dealing with him is to never let exchanges go further than 3 back and forths. Past that and you've entered the semantike zone
01-05-2015 , 09:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anais
I've found a good formula for dealing with him is to never let exchanges go further than 3 back and forths. Past that and you've entered the semantike zone
Ignoring him altogether works too.
01-05-2015 , 10:20 AM
We'll find out soon in the Dershowitz/Epstein sex scandal thread. Eagerly awaiting Ikes to elaborate on his "bitches lying for money" position.
01-05-2015 , 02:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anais
I've found a good formula for dealing with him is to never let exchanges go further than 3 back and forths. Past that and you've entered the semantike zone
This is incorrect. Just. Don't. Respond.
01-05-2015 , 11:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by problemeliminator
We'll find out soon in the Dershowitz/Epstein sex scandal thread. Eagerly awaiting Ikes to elaborate on his "bitches lying for money" position.
lol someone says there's no possible motive for lying, I point out an obvious possible motive, and I'm the idiot.

You're such a stupid ****. Maybe if you could argue at all, you wouldn't have to cry and take your ball home like a few others itt.
05-16-2015 , 06:54 PM
At this time, it's obvious that the Contain Teh Jabber-Wookie Vote isn't going to reach the 75% super-majority needed to pass. For this reason, I'm going to suggest we resurrect the great Los Dos Politard Embargo.

However, this time I feel we need to take it to the next level. We need some way to encourage those that say they'll do an embargo... to actually do that embargo. So, to that end... I'm going to offer up the Embargo Pledge
The Embargo Pledge
I pledge both to (a) not break my embargo by quoting, directly responding to, or in general 'feeding the troll' those on my embargo list, and (b) I pledge to call out ITT, and heap mockery and derision upon, any other pledge-makers who likewise break their embargo.
I'm going to go ahead and assume SenorKeeed is committed to the pledge. Since it's his thread, he can veto this entire tangent as far as I'm concerned. But barring that, here is the initial pledge list...

Los Dos Politards ~ Embargo Pledge List
Embargoed...Pledged By...
ikestoys, spanktehbadwookieSenorKeeed, Shame Trolly !!!1!
DudeImBetterSenorKeeed
Sputnik3000Shame Trolly !!!1!
05-16-2015 , 07:02 PM
You guys keep failing because it is not a good idea to willfully infringe on a person's communication rights and abilities, especially out of spite and hate. It's a big mistake.

The whole concept ITT is corruptible and easily discreditable. It would be smart to abandon and just use the forum software and add-ons in a civilized manner.
05-16-2015 , 07:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
At this time, it's obvious that the Contain Teh Jabber-Wookie Vote isn't going to reach the 75% super-majority needed to pass. For this reason, I'm going to suggest we resurrect the great Los Dos Politard Embargo.

However, this time I feel we need to take it to the next level. We need some way to encourage those that say they'll do an embargo... to actually do that embargo. So, to that end... I'm going to offer up the Embargo Pledge
The Embargo Pledge
I pledge both to (a) not break my embargo by quoting, directly responding to, or in general 'feeding the troll' those on my embargo list, and (b) I pledge to call out ITT, and heap mockery and derision upon, any other pledge-makers who likewise break their embargo.
I'm going to go ahead and assume SenorKeeed is committed to the pledge. Since it's his thread, he can veto this entire tangent as far as I'm concerned. But barring that, here is the initial pledge list...

Los Dos Politards ~ Embargo Pledge List
Embargoed...Pledged By...
ikestoys, spanktehbadwookieSenorKeeed, Shame Trolly !!!1!
DudeImBetterSenorKeeed
Sputnik3000Shame Trolly !!!1!
wow, and I thought rigtards were stupid.
05-16-2015 , 10:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
At this time, it's obvious that the Contain Teh Jabber-Wookie Vote isn't going to reach the 75% super-majority needed to pass. For this reason, I'm going to suggest we resurrect the great Los Dos Politard Embargo.

However, this time I feel we need to take it to the next level. We need some way to encourage those that say they'll do an embargo... to actually do that embargo. So, to that end... I'm going to offer up the Embargo Pledge
The Embargo Pledge
I pledge both to (a) not break my embargo by quoting, directly responding to, or in general 'feeding the troll' those on my embargo list, and (b) I pledge to call out ITT, and heap mockery and derision upon, any other pledge-makers who likewise break their embargo.
I'm going to go ahead and assume SenorKeeed is committed to the pledge. Since it's his thread, he can veto this entire tangent as far as I'm concerned. But barring that, here is the initial pledge list...

Los Dos Politards ~ Embargo Pledge List
Embargoed...Pledged By...
ikestoys, spanktehbadwookieSenorKeeed, Shame Trolly !!!1!
DudeImBetterSenorKeeed
Sputnik3000Shame Trolly !!!1!
Sure, I've been ignoring these morons for quite a while now
05-16-2015 , 10:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
Teh Jabber-Wookie
Not bad, cousin, not bad at all.

05-22-2015 , 10:00 PM
I'm rescinding my embargo of spanktehbadwookie.

Now that he's a mod again... I feel I'm leaving quality LOLZ out on the table if I don't comment on that ongoing fiasco. Since he's made it very clear several times he simply won't respond to me as a poster, including before SenorKeeed started this embargo thread, effectively embargoing me... I don't expect any change regarding non-mod related posts.

My embargo of ikestoys & sputnik3000 continue.
05-22-2015 , 10:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SenorKeeed
Sure, I've been ignoring these morons for quite a while now
Haven't you been responding to me? If not, you've sure as **** been responding to running commentary about me. Not sure if that's better if your goal is to reduce my posting by not feeding my "attention whore" ways.
05-23-2015 , 06:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
My embargo of ikestoys & sputnik3000 continue.
05-23-2015 , 01:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
Can you spot the human right they want to use popular force to infringe upon by calling for bannings? May even be more than one.

waw what a pile of crap? is this what the american media is brainwashing you with? waw man such a poor taste, very elitist and low !

Last edited by reziduer; 05-23-2015 at 01:50 PM. Reason: btw I randomly serfing here, mb I am out of line. still 75 IQ and above people don't believe in human rights...
05-23-2015 , 01:48 PM
people who speak of human rights are the ones dropping the bombs or the bans.
see what i did there?

game over kids

      
m