No. The voting booth cares what the **** i think.

See fellow conservatives, this is what you get when you actually attempt to have a conversation with a liberal. They don't want to answer your questions, they just want to spout their memes and their critical theory and their white guilt, and when you address it with the socratic method and with facts, they fall apart like dry paper.

Progressivism is bankrupt. It's over. A thing of the past. Take heart.

RIP we hardly knew ye

you base policy on the romantic prose of a poet

hahahahahahaha

Not a liberal. And you want me to be precise in my labeling. Yeah sure. A few of you are lucky im as restrained as i am.

The Irish answer was good it just went over your head. It should fully inform you of my views on letting people from the third world into the US. Im for it.

I know you want to keep em out and its not a color race based thing. Alright fine. What ever helps you sleep at night.

Was not looking for a conversation with you, more making statements. As far as your virtue signaling and demand for cooperative conversation. No.

Wtf does this even mean? Also you are almost certainly a liberal.


It didn't go over my head I fully understand the reference. It was also not a good response. I asked you if you believe there is a qualitative difference between immigration policy choices, to which you said you thought open borders were the same as no immigration, and then you said the Irish thing, to which I asked you in response if you believe that all immigration filtering is racism, or otherwise based on discriminatory impulses, to which you did not respond.

Incorrect. Immigration is necessary unless our birth rate goes up. What I am asking you is how do you create an immigration filtration policy, or do you consider all immigration filtering some type of negative discrimination or racism? Obviously anyone who answers the latter is a complete moron.


Seems like pretty much every leftist in this place just likes to make one line statements, relevant or not, and when someone engages their nonsense they run for the hills because Nazis. I'm assuming the left has always been this way which goes a long way to explain why western countries are in the absolute ****hole after 75 years of liberal rule.

did you not know hes a space marine with almost 300 confirmed kills? you best be thanking your lucky stars hes restrained

For starters, maybe try not assigning a label to everyone that remotely tries to engage. Better yet, gfys on a DoOrNob.

Awww, boo boo. Don't like being labeled? How do you think we liked unfairly being called racist for 75 years? Now you have Trump to deal with. Two terms.

You know keep it up though, you totally won't piss more and more people off and drive them into our loving arms to win even more elections.

it just isn't necessary, you can debate whether immigration is good or not. But its not necessary in first world economies regardless of birth rate. Hong kong, 1.24 births/women, singapore 1.23, japan 1.4, all highly developed stable countries with close to 0 net immigration.

the idea that you absolutely need to import people to support your social programs is just silly.

Keep thinking people don't want to talk to you for reasons other than you're a douchebag.

Right i answered the part i wanted to and ignored the rest. See non cooperative.

People would not like mine if i had my ideal. You would have not borders. Immigration solved!!

But as a realist in a world with them i do have answers to your questions but as is said..not interested.

Nah. If there are any conservatives out there that come at me with respect ill give it and give an honest back and forth. You did not do that but demand it from me. No.

I mean restrained in calling people bigots and racist. If you dont think im less apt to break out those terms then others around these part you have not been paying attention.

Freud is a genius and fundamental to modern day psycology idk why you are lumping him in with Marx.

the whole irish immigration thing misses the context of when that occured. Yes there was no filter on Irish immigration, but in the 1800s the US has no welfare and no universal sufferage. People coming in had to make it in the US based on their own merits or leave, and most people who failed to contribute left.

When you import people with no filter, give them social assistance which most need because they are coming to an alien language and culture, and give them the vote within 5 years so they can vote for more social assistance that is a recipe for disaster.

The US doesn't have this insane policy currently as legal immigration is actually quite difficult rn however some countries are doing this, Sweden being the best example. We'll see the consequences within 30 years and it won't be pretty.

lol

lol u trollin

If were going to have to have them who said id have opened borders. Not me. I would let the poor in though. Sorry.

Somebody call the wahhhhhmbulance.

not trolling in the least.

most of his breakthrough ideas have seeped into western culture so you only associate him with his silly ideas like penis envy

the unconscious mind, the importance of early childhood to later development, and the primacy of the base desires of our primitive minds underling our veneer of the rational all stem from Freud. His good ideas have become so accepted that we don't even associate them with Freud.

comparing him to Marx is completely uncalled for.

You wont be able to cite me calling someone a racist. Not that i did not just imply that with dot. But i dont even go there often.

I never even called the one who cant be named a racist. Though im pretty sure he knows what i think!


As far as bigot. There are a few religious bigots against Islam around. You have to condemn its as a whole to get there. Think im more then fair.

I'm loling at the idea that people are lucky not to be called racist or bigot by you on 2p2

Well the people getting called those things whine about it constantly and tell us thats why trump won so i showed restraint to the fainting couches. Thanks for correcting my thinking.

You're wasted and going to feel embarrassed about this series of posts in the morning. Or maybe - and this possibility is even worse - you're actually being serious and are really stupid enough to believe that some minuscule interaction between two randoms on a small message board is capable of finally defeating progressivism once and for all!

Progressivism defeated itself. We're just ringing in the death knell goofy.