I'm not apologizing for anyone. The video did not describe the transcript suzzer quoted. I distinctly said I disagreed with him.

JFC there is no such thing as being the aggressor when that age. Everything is on the adult to regulate/defuse/avoid the situation. And 99.9% of the time the adult just manipulated the kid into thinking they were the aggressor. I'm sure young Milo was really the predator with his Catholic priest.

You really are a sick ****.

You heard right about the salary.

Jesus Christ. When your disgusting views are even too repulsive for CPAC and the Republican (white nationalist) party to stand, you need to take cold, long look in the mirror.

Yyou are making it harder for them to do a character assasination on Milo.

They would like you to cave in so they can just ignore Milo's arguments and call him the ___ , ___ and ____ word.

Oh my radiation badge just lit up. Tapping out for a while. Good luck all.

Wing nut means right wing. There are forms of libertarianism which are leftist, and I didn't want to include those. You seem to be the resident expert detailing why arnacho-capitalists/rightwing libertarians suck. I thought you might train your guns on Milo and the whole pedophilia/libertarian relationship- you know, Rothbard and his market for children? The implication there is pretty direct.

I care because I am against viciousness justified behind the simple postulates of a political/economic philosophy. I don't usually defer to others on those matters, but you seem to be a specialist at ripping libertarians a new one.

wil and others,

I would be interested in your philosophical-ideological journey and how Republican-style conservatism led you to eventually being condoning of sexual relationships between 13 year olds and adults.

It's more complicated than that. It's obvious Milo looks positively on his past experiences, something I have trouble defending in terms of other people's situations. I believe there are differences in men and women and they way they look at these circumstances, in a very general sense. I don't think that is unreasonable, as I'm sure many of us could relate.

Are you saying you, or most men, would not have wanted the same situations when we were of the same age, although with females? I know I would have.

I don't need to take a cold hard look at anything. I have my opinions and if people dislike them, so be it. You implying that any subject another group of people may disagree with must determine it is revolting is funny, considering the lefts stance on Islam and their treatment of subjects just like these.

Dude, you're not hurting me by expressing your support for pedophilia. Where has your movement gone wrong to the point that you would think you are?

I wonder if JvK would be bff's to creeps like Sandusky like wil and kypreanus, or if he is smart enough to distance himself from the pro-pedophilia comments.

It's ironically homophobic criticism, as his life experience is not that atypical for a gay man. I thought the leftist point of view was that these types of personal sexual experiences are beyond such criticism, like in Lena Dunham's case. When did they become so right wing about sexual mores? I had no idea they were such homophobes.

I don't condone Milo's personal life either and think it's pretty terrible, but I'm not a leftist.

Wil is a liberal who voted for Clinton.

As has been pointed out ad infinitum, Milo has no arguments. He's an outrage pronographer.

Except now the outrage is directed at him.

Which is worse:

1) Some college freshman with purple hair ranting about the patriarchy

or

2) A popular speaker who extols the "safety and security" of relationships between young boys and grown men?

MS, that is one post bleeding intellectually dishonest. Argue better.

Again, it's more complicated than that. You are taking a simplistic approach to something that is more complex. I already stated my stance on the subject, and I disagree with Milo. That doesn't mean it's as simple as saying "wil condones pedophilia".

Just as we can all agree that having naked pictures of a 15 year old person on your phone is considered child pornography if someone defended another 15 year old possessing those pictures due to their girlfriend sending them to them, I wouldn't run around saying that person condoned child pornography.

Circumstances mean something. In Milo's case the adult was at fault, as the responsibility was on them to control the situation. Milo looks at the circumstances in a positive light, so that must be taken into consideration as far as holding him accountable to expose the men he was involved with at the time. If the solution were in my past and the genders were different, I'd do the same.

You completely misunderstand the views of the left. Being gay and being a lesbian and being in an adult-minor relationship are entirely different things. See it all comes down to this concept called consent. Two men can consent to have sex, just like two women. A man and a thirteen year old boy cannot. This is not anti-gay. You are not understanding the viewpoint of the left at all it would seem, perhaps because you got it from a non left source.

That's not what everyone is upset about. Obviously I'm not angry at Milo for being taken advantage of as a child. But now he is going around using his platform to condone this type of behavior as an adult, and he says he's been to these parties in Hollywood where this type of behavior has gone on, but he doesn't want to snitch on any of those people. What is this all adding up to? It doesn't look good, I can tell you that.

We're actually having to explain consent to adults. Jesus ****ing christ.

I don't support pedophilia. I defend Milo's ability to look at his sexual experiences as positive. I don't condone it and wouldn't want it for others but I'm not here to judge how he "should" view it, just as I don't judge those who choose to get abortions.

Most people would shy away from this topic, and this is a prime example of why. Discussing something like this can mostly only lead to a negative outcome, just as a topic like criticizing Islam. That doesn't scare me enough to not defend my argument.

Milo has lost his defiance. You know it's serious. We may have finally found the line at "functioning sex organs".

It's not an adult mind, it's wil.

Would you say that you simply enjoy being provocative?

OK sure. I think they're on the pedos/enablers/friendly/dontcare continuum. I was just thinking the same thing. Remember zan nen and "peeks not pokes"?

Hey, alt-character isn't shallow or is shallow? I've gotten mixed signals from alts about character. What about milko's character is being assassinated by repeating what's been said? Do these arguments you mention ever stop when they can't hold up to information anymore? Are these arguments posted anywhere here like ITT somewhere in an easy reading form?