Quote:
Originally Posted by ToothSayer
Fly's point was irrelevant, since house effect has nothing to do with delta, the only item of interest.
Sure, although I think the USC method of weighting by enthusiasm is likely to exaggerate short-term movement. Also, I think fly's point is that, compared to everyone else, USC has always had an unrealistically high appraisal of Trump's chances with Hispanics, which may very easily have something to do with the static composition of their panel. Both of the above are significant caveats to relying on that one poll to gauge Hispanics reactions to this story. Plus, you may as well wait for the election at this point.