I'm picturing a reality show where Bahbah, Adios and Silverbug all get a house together. Try to imagine the conversations. Just a fascinating insight into racist, misogynist, selfish man-childs.

I'd watch it.

But most conservatives aren't trying to use a gun to get me to feed the hungry. They use a gun to get me to fund the military or whatever.

Trying to force someone else to fix a problem you won't try to fix voluntarily makes you a piece of ****, and a violent animal.

Latest word on NPR is that the extreme weather-induced droughts and ensuing larger than normal wildfires have cost an extra $1 billion in firefighting funds this year that had to be yanked from other areas of budgets.

Looks like one way or another tax payers are gonna be on the hook for this.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014...e-krauthammer/


""How ironic, then, that some environmental activists launched a petition urging the Post not to publish Krauthammer’s column on Friday.""

""Their response to opinions they disagree with is to suppress the speech.""

""Instead, these folks believe that censorship is preferable. Why engage Krauthammer when they might just be able to employ pressure tactics to silence him? And what’s the difference between this and shouting down a speaker at a town hall?""

"Krauthammer told me the petition-signers “showed up just in time to make precisely the point I made in the column.”

""When it comes to free speech, he says, “they don’t even hide it anymore. Now they proudly want certain arguments banished from discourse. The next step is book burning. So the question of the day is: Can you light a Kindle?""


Climate people...They are worse than the femi-nazis lol.

Did somebody really just type "femi-nazis" unironically?

false.

Al Gore this weekend, "The Dust Bowl is Coming Back Quickly, Unless We Act"

Let me get this straight the dust bowl happened in the thirties and it was not due to man caused climate change. Now man can prevent a dust bowl by acting quickly to do whatever Al says to do. Did Al fly into Kansas City on his private jet?

I agree. Libtards claiming Al Gore hasn't made a fortune off his climate alarmism schtick is actually kind of interesting though.

For all the lurkers in this forum.......

Just to show how wing nut people like gambol and roonil are amongst several others, and to a lesser extent Kurto...

Just read all the facebook comments at the bottom of that article...

They are a majority in this little niche poker site, but not IRL.

wtf are you talking about? The Dust Bowl was directly caused by inappropriate farming techniques on arid grasslands. There is absolutely zero disagreement or controversy on this subject.

They're really digging deep into the derp bin by bringing up Al Gore. Isn't there a more modern figure you guys can make tu quoque fallacies about? Hey, I'll bet Bill Nye owns a house and drives a car. lol hypocrite!

No chimpstare for Al Gore tripe though

Please, I've been doing my best to not engage you as you post your usual nonsense and bring every thread to a crawl about you.

Please do me the favor and do the same. I'm not interested in your usual contradictory, semantic tomfoolery and horrible ikesian coversations. I can read all the other people mocking your posts without engaging in one too.

Thank you in advance.

I do love Silverman's logic. He can measure the beliefs of the real world by facebook comments below one story of one newspaper. What a methodology!

Each day he proves that he can be dumber then you thought he was.

Don't say stupid stuff, you won't be engaged. Al Gore has a pretty obvious public stance on conservation and lowering CO2 use. Him using massive amounts unnecessarily would obviously be hypocritical.

Gore could buy an SUV, fuel it with baby seal oil, drive through a spotted owl habitat, and basically be the biggest hypocrite ever and that wouldn't change the veracity of climate science in the slightest. It's a classic tu quoque fallacy and you know it.

Was anyone saying that it did? I thought people were just bashing Al Gore.

That explains your history of saying stupid stuff. You like to be engaged.

No. you are omitting the whole part of Gore's thesis that one can contribute to CO2 use if one does something to counter it. A simple example would be that a company can have a large carbon footprint but counter it by planting trees, using renewable energy sources, investing in cleaner technologies, etc.

Furthermore, the people criticizing Gore:
(1) do nothing to diminish his arguments as whether or not he's a hypocrite has no bearing on the validity of the message and
(2) ignore where's he's addressed what he does about his carbon footprint (consistent with his rhetoric)
Although you could surprise me I would actually have given you the benefit of the doubt that you knew that Gore's ideas including the idea of carbon emission trading. If in fact you knew this and your reply above (the quality Ikesian response of "no") then you were knowing being wrong. And if you didn't know it then I apologize for assuming you actually knew about what his ideas were since you were saying I was wrong.

Now you may return to ikesing up all the other threads.

Well duh dude. Problem is that Kurto said those actions wouldn't make him a hypocrite. They definitely would.

Now, kurto's tits are so lit he's defending gore from the hypocrite accusations, like that would make his post better.

Not sure you have much of an idea what my view on climate change and remedies are, but good luck with using Kansas City newspaper comment sections to support your argument. Ive read Chiefsplanet, you aren't helping your argument.

Hopefully an oil company wouldn't waste its money on stuff this bad. Mark Steyn is countersuing Mann. I'm not exactly sure what Steyn's reasoning is. Mann's suit against Steyn and the National Review is continuing. The judge ruled that the suit could go and is not a SLAPP--though this is being appealed (not by Steyn, though who is currently representing himself.)


This is amazing nonsense. First, according to other "skeptic" sites, Ball's suit is not over. Second, the data and code for Mann's 1998 paper has been available for years. Pure drivel.

you really are one of the worst regulars. I mean, you can't meet the bigotry of silverman or the apparent insanity of some others. But you really are just intellectually bankrupt. There's a reason that probably 95% of every thread you jump into turns into a discussion about you and how full of crap you are.

So which is it- that's you're legitimately ignorant of Gore's ideas or that you're being ikesing it up by ignoring the parts that make you wrong?

This is even better. This is from about.com. (added link)

Remember, the question was is Al Gore being consistent with what he says? Ikes says false. Implying that he is aware of what Al Gore says, right?

I of course already said this (though not as well as written above) before. So the entirety of Ike's "False" as well as Silverman's comments are clearly wrong.