So you don't love winning?

wpn should create an exchange, because i would definitely throw cash at combat points

your guys arguments are both invalid because a million dollar rake payer or a 2 cent rake payer is equally justified to receive the points imo??

or, like i said above, the top bidder , would make sense imo

I agree....

Im not drinking the kool.aid like most, particularly this forum above others. It seems the othe forum with the wpn rep had a more diverse mentality were sombody multitabling 6/12 tables with huds and seat scripters is still considered a rec+??

Only on 2+2..and acr..#2 complaint all regs..#1 the late reg.. the gi60 dont fill becouse there are no rec and the edge to all the regs is a little bit less!!then a 3 hour late..

The 3 hour late are 4 those who are for aggresuve regs with B.R. rec,s are suckers play those(fan duel)
.. also the cash out spots in the gi60 are so tight, once again to give back! The edge to the reg..just like ive been saying that was validated by the ceo. "We goto make sure they can pay there light bill" so its nuanced to help them..you guys can nit me all u want for your own purposes..

Its been validated by the ceo, an acr grnder who doos make a lot of doe and a handfull.of other more competant players then me.

Were the thought of acr.not proactivly nuanced edges for the grindets is offensive and they!!! Scream foul, lol..

I think your right we are both.invalid or both.valid in its own way..

To the rest of u.please put down the kool aid..

Just waiting for this guy to finally get bored and stop wasting my time with incomprehensible ramblings.

sparten just quit the b****ing and move to bovada. they cant accumulate a hand history on you, and its aimed towards recs.

UN
Bovada doesnt take n.y. and we all know bol poker is as crooked as it gets..

Acr could be great. Ive been playing at full flush for the past couple of months and its full of ex acr recs..

We all preety much agree we prefer acr if it wasnt so hostile to recs.

If acr made a serious attempt at recs?? Im sure you would agree at least somewhat. All the money for the mill doesnt attract us..

I just wished that acr would..

Full.flush is all recs but admittedly very hostile to grinders. Im honest dude!!
Acr should make a serious attempt at those recs..f.f. is in every state that acr is. Instead of wasting a mill.on grinders spend 50k on recs, duh??

Somewhere inside u, u guys know there's a lot of valdaty to what im saying..

Check out his posts on Poker Fraud Alert and you will see that he wont stop anytime soon. He is just straight up crazy and thinks everything is a conspiracy. The sad part is I think he might actually be a rather intelligent person but his mental problems over shadow any constructive thoughts he might have.

If u seen iv been very supportive of acr to others, my intent is sincere. I give credit where credit is due as well as criticize. Perhaps my literally skills need help but nonetheless its true.. the nits just use that as fodder to deflect and redirect..

Something u always do. My sincere post above is absutly true but u redirected, of course

As far as conspiracies go, there not.! All substantiated if u know were to look and info that the media refuses to examine for there own means.. obama is not who u think he is and the neo cons arw fine with it as long as they can keep there fiefdoms..

P.s.
Is your house reptillian infested too or just insectoids..
Also listen to pfa podcast on sticher. I occasionally call in with alien infestation reports.

This is a LOW CONTENT thread for WPN. Can someone please ban this guy, I mean, please?

Sounds good.

Then I guess it's time to move on.

If you want to make coherent posts about WPN that aren't simply ranting about how terrible you think it is and how no one should play there, your posts might be relevant to this thread. But you've made it clear now to everyone how you feel about this site, so it's time to move on from that subject.

And yet you guys keep feeding him...

Fair observation; he broke me.

coodnt of said it bettetr

Hey guys, this is a low content thread - not a 'spew whatever you want regardless of the rules of the forum' thread, or a 'flame war' thread. It's LOW content, not NO content. Try to keep it somewhat decent eh?

Lame

Did IHTN have too much time on his hands when he was tracking all the money owed to players by Lock? Seriously if you have a problem with someone trying to do something positive you can go ead

are you still making fake accounts to start threads in an effort to reply to yourself? In terms of who has too much time on their hands i have to say you took the cake with that one.

Cool, he made a thread documenting who was owed. In the end, what did it accomplish? Nobody got paid a dime but hey, everybody was able to see a visual chart of what was owed! (because reading the countless "im waiting x amount of days" posts wasnt enough to sink in for some people)

Several dozen from the report itself did get paid, actually, because they were cataloged and public, and it forced Shane to respond. Now, he gave a lot of lip service and never lived up to his promises, but the players' participation in the report helped about 70 or 80 of them over the life of the report receive their money. Not nearly enough, but a few is better than none.

The end result doesn't matter. If everyone got paid or nobody got paid it makes no difference, the only thing that matters is that IHTN put the effort in to try to help people out. Can you say the same for yourself? Please go away now.

Lol you cant possibly think your chart is what got a few people paid? There was plenty of posters documenting their wait periods long before you compiled a complete list.

he put in hours of updating a chart that served people the same purpose as them taking 30 seconds to browse the lock withdrawal thread. All the hours wasted compiling a chart when the same information and general assessment of the situation couldve been gathered by someone in 30 seconds of a quick forum browse? Like i said, guy has too much time on his hands and seriously needs a hobby.

Publicizing exactly what the actual facts were probably kept a lot of players from depositing or redepositing on Lock, thereby saving a lot of players from losing their money.

November 2013 and forward on the Lock Payout report

Lock Payout thread from user posts from November 2013 and beyond

thats what you fail to realize, it was already public. Locks payout woes wasnt some big secret. The true marks dont research a site before depositing anyways, so they were losing regardless. People "in the know" forum browsers etc. was able to see the countless posts documenting slow payouts way before the compiled list. The list wasnt some grond breaking news that all of a sudden got poker media to address lock lol. It was already known by people who weren't idiots.


just couldnt help but plug your valuable contribution huh lol.

You brought it up, I was just responding. I have thousands of PM's too if you want to see all the 'wasted hours' I spent talking to people about the report. I never said it was ground-breaking, was just inspired by player complaints to try to help.

So in your mind we don't need Amber Alerts because people can always google to see which children have been kidnapped.

Putting all the noise that was going on about Lock in a clear factual form so players could see for themselves what was going on was a great service to the poker community. You don't seem to be aware that at the time there were plenty of people saying that everything was going to be alright. People have a tenancy to believe what they want to believe rather than what they should be able to see with their own eyes. IHTN's thread made the facts of the matter crystal clear to even the doubters.

You seem to be completely naive about what was actually happening at that time and about the confusion as to what extent players were actually getting paid until IHTN quantified the situation. Yes, there was plenty written on the web about the lack of payouts during that time; IHTN's thread was the impetus and organized factual source for many of those posts.