Quote:
Originally Posted by twoblack9s
I am really starting to wonder what an obtainable hourly rate is with a $7 rake? I have been playing about 5 sessions now downtown and am down about $200 overall.
I can't blame you for asking -- it's human nature -- but use this as a learning opportunity. A 90 hour sample is not enough to tell you anything constructive about winrate. If you've played seriously online for very long, you won't think that -100 bb over 3000 hands means a whole lot. If you're having trouble adjusting to the pace of B&M and that 3000 hand downswings mean 5 trips, well, you're not alone.
(I like to play with random.org to get a feel for how bad a winning player can run. See the Gaussian generator. If you need some numbers -- for $1-2, try a mean of $10, a SD of $100/hr, and take 1000 observations and paste them in a spreadsheet. Do this 100 times and see how you're running after 90 hours each time. I have no reason to think your actual winrate is $10/hour, but it's a decent made-up number for a good 2+2 player.)
Detroit rake is horrible, but 2+2 could have built their site just out of posts claiming such-and-such is unbeatable based on small samples and/or lack of winrate.
FWIW i'm slaughtering the 5/10 limit Omaha hi-lo for $27/hour over 77 hours. Many people will tell you high rake makes split-pot games unbeatable. Have i proven anything? No, i've just run good.
Last edited by AKQJ10; 06-12-2011 at 05:11 PM.