hard to say anything without any info about the situation. why didn't you post reads? how we expect the players we are shoving into to react is more important than the cards we are holding imo.
in case you did not post reads because you didn't have any: maybe you are playing too many tables and autopilot too much. It helped my game a lot to tone down the number of tables for a while and pay more attention to table dynamics. I think this is generally a good idea to do that at least once a week for a session but in case you struggle to get an idea about the players in relevant positions/reads in general then maybe you should cut down the number of tables for a longer while and then gradually increase again once you pick up on things like that easier.
the only 1 i didnt like was the T3o from the button when the sb was so short also but that doesnt make it wrong just a crap spot and you get crap spots when short all the time
really depends on villain. I think its more of a " is villain a reg or not " decision most of the time. not that much on VIP etc etc... obviously you distinguish between LAG and TAG regs after :-P
most of the regs are so good they are calling almost/near optimal range so most of the hands u posted are folds... obviously different vs fish/randoms
really depends on villain. I think its more of a " is villain a reg or not " decision most of the time. not that much on VIP etc etc... obviously you distinguish between LAG and TAG regs after :-P most of the regs are so good they are calling almost/near optimal range so most of the hands u posted are folds... obviously different vs fish/randoms