Villain stats - 51/26 3 bet 6.7%

Looking back i think 4 betting with a plan of getting it in pre flop is fine here, decided to call and play a flop in position in the moment though.

Good flop for me of course any thoughts on raising the small flop bet here?

Turns obviously good too and at this point i guess the best move would be to raise to create a bigger pot to get all the money in. heinsight is a terrible thing haha.

Was instantly thinking he had a Tx on the river when he suddenly goes bigger and at the time i couldnt put him on enough weaker hands to make the call. Obviously misplayed 2 streets there but as played do you call river?

Ads

preflop - 4-bet jam

flop. Ok, I guess.

turn - raise to about 600 and call if he shoves.

As played I think I fold river, particularly as he is so passive but its close. Is he betting that small on the flop with a T? Maybe with a weak kicker he would play it this way.

How many hands are those stats over?

36 hands

PRE:

even though his VPIP and PR stats are insane his 3bet is standard, so calling here and playing postflop IP is fine unless you´ve got some read on him he is defending his blinds to much (in this scenario meaning he can 5bet shove on you with hands like AT, AJ, AQ or KQ) . 4bet jam OTF is also not bad, but imho is better when you are OOP and you can openshove OTF, not to mention that if you 4bet this early on the strengt of your hand should be exposed to every thinking player. Also I would not advise 4bet jam in this spot. Given the stacksizes its just screamin: AK, QQ, JJ!!! but it really depends on your sample size with this guy. If its big enough, then this guy is obviously a big fish playing 51/26 and then 4bet jam would be as matter of fact the best choice. 4bet jamming is also the best choice when you are multitabling hard. Myself against random player on these stakes I would just call.

OTF

either call or making it like 250

OTT

not well played, def. a raise

OTR

i am not folding here without some read on the player, given the fact he is playing 51/26 and given the way he played the hand postflop i dont think he´s got T so often. He can have 7, weaker fd than you, 89, pocket pairs lower than K, random bluffs. I dont think he would have bet just 100 OTF with flushdraw. Also you should realize that given the way you played the hand he must think that your hand is´much weaker then in the fact is, so he is very sure he can bluff you out with a strong bet. But maybe I am wrong

You should know that I dont like to fold always trying to justify why not to fold

6.7 percent over 36 hands basically means he 3-bet twice given 30 opportunities or maybe once given 15 opportunities. That kind of sample size isn't a stat at all and I would go more on the basis of his general tendencies that he is loose/passive/bad.

Maybe flatting pre is good if you think you can just value-town him whenever you get TPTK. I would rather get it in pre though.

preflop: r/4b shove, don't call vs 3b, not even vs min-3b

flop: as played, raise to 300 and stack off, we have 2 overs + NFD

turn: as played, raise to 300 and stack off, TPTK + NFD

river: as played, fold

he could have Tx/7x because a small donk like that on drawy flop usually means he hit

we're playing guessing game, donk small-bet small-shove line could mean making up for lost value or bluff

^ I didn't notice the flush draw. I agree we should raise flop.