Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Fair Play technology (previously reported as Lobby Catalogue by other skin) Fair Play technology (previously reported as Lobby Catalogue by other skin)

03-04-2013 , 03:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by imjustshane
I have just heard word from the network team and we are on track to have the full FAQ released tomorrow.

They did confirm one detail for me and all tourneys (including SNG's) will not be affected at this point. This is only for ring game tables.
Ty, obviously good news. I just don't see how SNG's would have been feasible given the traffic and fees.
03-04-2013 , 04:20 PM
I have just heard word from the network team and we will have the full FAQ about it tomorrow that Shane is full of ****!! New thread should be up tomorrow please post all your questions in the allotted thread.

Best regards from 4barrelledjoe
03-04-2013 , 04:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatsNotPoker
I do enjoy the debate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mccormick
They probably do profile to some extent (although i'm not sure.. if they do, for what reason then, though?

.
I to, enjoy a good debate.

Trying to compare typical casino games, such as blackjack, to poker is difficult to do here. BUT, when it comes to poker, YES, B&M casinos absolutely are taking similar steps to protect newer and presumably weaker groups of players. Have you guys not heard of the "Ladies-Only" tournaments?

Is that not an example of a casino trying to reach a new market share, and initially protecting them from the sharks?
03-04-2013 , 04:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdClayChip
I to, enjoy a good debate.

Trying to compare typical casino games, such as blackjack, to poker is difficult to do here. BUT, when it comes to poker, YES, B&M casinos absolutely are taking similar steps to protect newer and presumably weaker groups of players. Have you guys not heard of the "Ladies-Only" tournaments?

Is that not an example of a casino trying to reach a new market share, and initially protecting them from the sharks?
I don't think that is a good example because it's catering to a specific group seperate from talent. Women aren't inherently worse at poker than men. The ladies-only is more like the casino employee only tournament to me. It's not restricted to them because they can't compete in open field tournaments, it's more of an appreciation thing.

If you'd used a new depositer freeroll as an example then i'd like it more. Although there will be some sharks even in that it is there to let new people get accustomed to a new site while being able to win some money for free.

Actually I think this would be something good for Lock to do. I said before that I think the Lock Lotto should be taken away and I think a daily $500 new depositor freeroll would be better. Lock is already spending $750/day on Lotto prizes that only benefit 3 people/day. Instead, they could do something to give extra money to new people, promote deposits, and actually save $250/day to do something else with (maybe another freeroll for everyone?). I have only ever gotten the lotto once so i may be biased but then again I would never play a freeroll and hopefully will never have to deposit on Lock again so I would get even less personal gain from the freeroll idea and I still think it would be infinitely better for the site.
03-04-2013 , 08:43 PM
Great idea, Lock Poker. I applaud you. Make it HARDER to find active tables by segregating players in order to IMPROVE the poker ecology.

This move shows how clueless and out of touch they are. Lock Poker is finished. I'll be surprised to see them around six months from now.
03-04-2013 , 09:35 PM
Just reposting to show what kind of person Shane really is:

Quote:
Originally Posted by imjustshane
Because another skin leaked some incorrect information.

We wanted to just correct that information quickly before we worked on getting the PR right. We had planned on having a few days to do this behind the scenes but the leak has meant we have to try to move that forward while at the same time just ensuring the wrong information isnt circulated.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Intertops Poker
Hi

Shane can play his little games if he so likes and this might even take the focus of other issues he/they have been having for a longer period of time. However, we never posted any incorrect information nor was it told to us that we couldn't say anything about it. We even told representatives from the network that we would post a short message about this new feature before we made the post and there was not anybody saying NO to that.

The message that we got from the network was that:
This new feature is scheduled to go live during the week beginning March 4th, 2013. How can that be missinterpreted?

The "Fair Play" will according to the network not be released today, this was just normal scheduled maintenance by the network.

Best regards,

The Intertops Poker Team
03-04-2013 , 09:42 PM
Shane,

Your posts remind me of Joe Sebok's. I sense bad things coming.
03-04-2013 , 09:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by VicVegas007
Just reposting to show what kind of person Shane really is:
I dont have access to any personal communication with Intertops all I have to go on is the communications sent to all network partners. This states clearly "We will be publicising this feature next week and we are happy to send you a preview of the piece before it goes out so that you can review it, we therefore ask that this information is kept extremely confidential for now."

That seems quite clear on keeping the information confidential, on the fact that the feature was only getting publicised this week and there would be a review process of that information. No where in this communication is any mention of a release date at all.
03-04-2013 , 09:56 PM
So they let you know that it was scheduled to go live the week of 3/4 and you set your "information blitz" (which you started getting questions from us on yesterday which leads us to believe there was no blitz before the outrage) to be released on 3/5? I think the house of cards is getting a little shaky.
03-04-2013 , 10:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by imjustshane
I dont have access to any personal communication with Intertops all I have to go on is the communications sent to all network partners. This states clearly "We will be publicising this feature next week and we are happy to send you a preview of the piece before it goes out so that you can review it, we therefore ask that this information is kept extremely confidential for now."

That seems quite clear on keeping the information confidential, on the fact that the feature was only getting publicised this week and there would be a review process of that information. No where in this communication is any mention of a release date at all.
So the Intertops rep made up that quote?
03-04-2013 , 10:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by imjustshane
I dont have access to any personal communication with Intertops all I have to go on is the communications sent to all network partners. This states clearly "We will be publicising this feature next week and we are happy to send you a preview of the piece before it goes out so that you can review it, we therefore ask that this information is kept extremely confidential for now."

That seems quite clear on keeping the information confidential, on the fact that the feature was only getting publicised this week and there would be a review process of that information. No where in this communication is any mention of a release date at all.
You say that you dont have any personal communication with Intertops so than how do you know they released incorrect information? Read the Intertops answer again. The network said it was going live on the 4th, the Network did not tell Intertops not to say anything and Intertops informed the Network they will be releasing a statement and the Network didn't say anything about it.

Or are you saying that Intertops lied?
03-04-2013 , 10:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 300zxrider
So the Intertops rep made up that quote?
As I said I have no other person communication was sent, all Im going by is the email that I quoted that seemed pretty clear that the only thing happening with Fair Play in the coming week was the information package and it wasn't even being released till after a review process.

There was a separate communication about the scheduled maintenance but it makes no mention of the Fair Play technology.
03-04-2013 , 10:22 PM
shane you're an idiot.
03-04-2013 , 10:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNGplayer24
shane you're an idiot.
+1
03-04-2013 , 11:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by imjustshane
I dont have access to any personal communication with Intertops all I have to go on is the communications sent to all network partners.
I coudlnt help but think of this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUuzxjwXVXE
03-04-2013 , 11:26 PM
Is this up and running now? I see several tables in the lobby that I cannot access. I generally 4 table but can only get on one table.

I also can't start a new table.
03-04-2013 , 11:51 PM
I came here to see if it has started after having the last hour played tougher games, and if not at least I got a taste of what it's going to be and I need to consider my options.
03-05-2013 , 12:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 300zxrider
So the Intertops rep made up that quote?
Quote:
Originally Posted by imjustshane
As I said I have no other person communication was sent, all Im going by is the email that I quoted that seemed pretty clear that the only thing happening with Fair Play in the coming week was the information package and it wasn't even being released till after a review process.

There was a separate communication about the scheduled maintenance but it makes no mention of the Fair Play technology.
So you say ur email stated for them to keep this quiet. Intertops rep says you didn't. Anyone with half a brain knows who to believe here. How do you know no other communication was sent if all ur going by is the email you quoted? As you have stated the network team is different from the lock team. Plz explain more....
03-05-2013 , 01:10 AM
Him not saying anything would've been way worse. The story already leaked.
03-05-2013 , 01:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by stlboy05
So you say ur email stated for them to keep this quiet. Intertops rep says you didn't. Anyone with half a brain knows who to believe here. How do you know no other communication was sent if all ur going by is the email you quoted? As you have stated the network team is different from the lock team. Plz explain more....
The network management team is still in place, I have an email from them that I quoted earlier that specifically asks for absolute confidentiality.

It also contains no mention of March 4th with the only timeline given being that the information package would be approved by skins and then be released this week.
03-05-2013 , 01:23 AM
So basically it was a failure to communicate between network management and the lock support staff? Also, still waiting for a reply in the endgame thread
03-05-2013 , 01:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by macgyver72
So basically it was a failure to communicate between network management and the lock support staff? Also, still waiting for a reply in the endgame thread
No I have very clear communication from the network management team.

I am unable to post in a thread detailing our future plans for the US market other than to say we do no intent to change which players we accept at all.
03-05-2013 , 02:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by imjustshane
No I have very clear communication from the network management team.

I am unable to post in a thread detailing our future plans for the US market other than to say we do no intent to change which players we accept at all.
That doesn't come close to answering the question. We're asking about what plans are in place for when US regulation gets further advanced and the player pool for lock is decimated. Also, what are the actions Lock is planning on taking if the DoJ happens to block Lock from US play on a given day? We realize this may or may not happen but we are curious of what the plan of action will be if this does take place. There has to be one.... right?

Last edited by macgyver72; 03-05-2013 at 02:20 AM. Reason: clarity
03-05-2013 , 02:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by macgyver72
Also, what are the actions Lock is planning on taking if the DoJ happens to block Lock from US play on a given day?
The DOJ can't just block US players from logging in to the site.
03-05-2013 , 03:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by imjustshane
The network management team is still in place, I have an email from them that I quoted earlier that specifically asks for absolute confidentiality.

It also contains no mention of March 4th with the only timeline given being that the information package would be approved by skins and then be released this week.
Because that quote means that's the actual email sent. Again the rep says that wasn't the case. You lie to ur players and Intertops is imo the most trustworthy site available to US players and somehow you expect us to believe you? Given your track record of not being honest with the players?

Can someone with connections to other skins confirm who isn't being truthful here? Not that it isn't already obvious. Also Shane even if the rep is wrong, what is the big deal if they do tell their players about this? Something to hide? You had a chance to be the clear #1 network and are running off people with all the lies. Party implemented basically the same program and it was available in advance to everyone. Something tells me you were never going to make an announcement(just like the orig segregation) and are angry with Itops for leaking the info,which any respectable company would do because unlike you they take care of their customers. Please just sell the network already.

      
m