Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Stoxtrader cheating/multi accounting discussion Stoxtrader cheating/multi accounting discussion

03-27-2010 , 09:17 AM
Hi Taylor,

As per your statement stox denied being involved in any form of collusion.

Now STOX is clearly not ready to send his HH's to anyone when you requested.

Is there any reason like zeejustin stated that stox could give when asked about sending the HH files?If there is any particular reason he stated (like no way i m gonna share my HH's with bunch of 2plus2ers )i think you should post that.or Did he just bluntly stated i cant send it?
03-27-2010 , 10:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by grindplz
Yea it was the "right thing to do" to eliminate a member / part of the company that would no longer be profitably because instead of being a high stakes nlhe full stacking reg like stoxtrader advertised he was instead a short stacking, ratholing, multi accounting cheater. Well done cardrunners.

MM I think you make a joke out of the stance you originally took if you so easily resume relationships with a company based on some PR statement that seems easily breakable based on cardrunners track record.

Few questions for taylor if he returns to this thread.

What will you do to players who work for your company who come forward and admit to having multi accounted in the coming weeks? Along with this what other then money has motivated you to change your stance on outing employees who have cheated when it has seemed to be a long standing policy of yours to say nothing.

When you were notified that employees of yours were cheating why did you decide to keep it to yourself rather then out these players?

Why is it that Brian Townsend has cheated multiple times but he is still a lead pro with your site?

Do you feel that the "about us" section of your site where you have player profiles is accurate at the current time for pros that teach on your site?

What is cardrunners stance on the fact that people who pay a monthly fee to your site have been misinformed and had money stolen from them by the unethical actions of your employees?


We're sorry Taylor is out of the office right now.

In all reality he probably has a team of like 8 people structuring a response to these questions. It should be done by Tuesday morning.
03-27-2010 , 10:43 AM
I mean everyone up in arms with TC's response, what were you hoping for instead?

It seems like everyone who is against it wanted him to give money back to the high stakes community for the cheating that some of his lead pros were involved in. Or did you guys want him to just dissolve his company altogether? Either option is completely laughable and obviously would never happen.

I think what was said was exactly what he needed to say. Sure it's not going to make everyone happy, but there really isn't much more he can do. A multi million dollar brand went to dust and a cheater was outed b/c of this thread. I am pretty happy with that result.
03-27-2010 , 10:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AceCR9
this.


there wasn't any other course of action CRers could have taken with this, and to get praise for saying "Multiaccounting is bad, we won't allow our pros to do it" is just rediculous. Wow, you won't promote pros who cheat your customers out of money(anymore), and you'll expect them to adhere to the same set of T&C everyone else does!


Meanwhile people still listed on their guest pro list have admitted to MA'ing in the past(in the msnl FTP regs thread last week).
You seem to have a clear personal vendetta against CR and the people that run their site. I remember (you might not) you being the reason I even looked into getting a subscription to CR because of how high you were praising it when we were playing in a live 10/20 game at TS in Nov 2006.

Obviously there has been some sort of fallout between then and now, but without clarification it seems, to me at least, that you are just out to troll TC as hard as possible.
03-27-2010 , 11:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tdomeski
I mean everyone up in arms with TC's response, what were you hoping for instead?

It seems like everyone who is against it wanted him to give money back to the high stakes community for the cheating that some of his lead pros were involved in. Or did you guys want him to just dissolve his company altogether? Either option is completely laughable and obviously would never happen.

I think what was said was exactly what he needed to say. Sure it's not going to make everyone happy, but there really isn't much more he can do. A multi million dollar brand went to dust and a cheater was outed b/c of this thread. I am pretty happy with that result.
I can only speak for myself and I am not up in arms about his response. My point is that anything that he CHOOSES to respond to is so carefully worded and PC that it comes off like a damn lawyer wrote it for him.

Did he answer some tough questions a few pages ago. Yes. Fine. Did he also sidestep some? Yes.

The kid is a 20 something year old with a million dollar business. It is to be expected. This is a public forum though dude so you can expect his responses to be hit from all angles.

Do I personally care if 2p2 decides to resume business with them? No I don't because it makes no difference to me. Should they imo? Not yet.

I mean Cardrunners tried to make MA'ing F@#@&ING LEGAL FOR THEMSELVES! with their goddam EDU tables. Whose bright idea was that and where did it originate from? I know it never happened but I still can't get over the premise of that whole idea.
03-27-2010 , 02:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrdasefx
My point is that anything that he CHOOSES to respond to is so carefully worded and PC that it comes off like a damn lawyer wrote it for him.
A lawyer probably did write it for him.
03-27-2010 , 02:50 PM
I have been playing poker live and betting sports for decades. I never felt compelled to join the forum before. I do once in a while pop in and read some of the topics. I do not play on line because there always seems to be a new scandal popping up. The only thing worse then the scandals is the response to them. I would love to sit in a 5-10 NL game from the comfort of my living room. Knowing full well I would be giving away an edge to the more experienced and in many cases better players. I play for fun and am a big boy losing is a potential reality every time you sit at a table. I can accept that 100%. But with the stuff that takes place I could never know with compete certainty I was not cheated. This I could not accept.
If the scandals that have hit on line poker had tougher consequences it would go a long way to not only legalizing poker but to attracting people like myself to the tables. People with plenty disposable income who would love to play regularly. Since that is not a reality I will just put a dime on Butler and watch TV.
03-27-2010 , 02:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tdomeski
You seem to have a clear personal vendetta against CR and the people that run their site. I remember (you might not) you being the reason I even looked into getting a subscription to CR because of how high you were praising it when we were playing in a live 10/20 game at TS in Nov 2006.

Obviously there has been some sort of fallout between then and now, but without clarification it seems, to me at least, that you are just out to troll TC as hard as possible.
and rightfully so
03-27-2010 , 02:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tdomeski
I mean everyone up in arms with TC's response, what were you hoping for instead?

It seems like everyone who is against it wanted him to give money back to the high stakes community for the cheating that some of his lead pros were involved in. Or did you guys want him to just dissolve his company altogether? Either option is completely laughable and obviously would never happen.

I think what was said was exactly what he needed to say. Sure it's not going to make everyone happy, but there really isn't much more he can do. A multi million dollar brand went to dust and a cheater was outed b/c of this thread. I am pretty happy with that result.
its not his response, its the reaction to his response, theres nothing he can say to make it better there should just be outrage and intolerance of this behavior, instead he was praised which is just " wtf did u even read this thread?"
03-27-2010 , 03:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by grindplz
I don't see how Taylor's response is at all good or satisfying to the community. Over the past few years he has learned that major people from his company have been taking part in cheating and each time has not outed this information. Instead he has allowed 2p2ers to get cheated out of additional money and not acted until someone else has come forward outing the multi accounting.

Of course it makes sense for taylor to act in his best interests and keep the cheating to himself but it seems ridiculous for him to then make that post once he is forced to and people act as if he is being righteous. Cardrunners has had no problem looking past cheating in the past and I am not at all confident in how taylor will decide to police it in the future.
+1
03-27-2010 , 04:51 PM
[QUOTE=grindplz;17772767] I don't see how Taylor's response is at all good or satisfying to the community. QUOTE]


Quote:
Originally Posted by grindplz
Few questions for taylor if he returns to this thread.

What will you do to players who work for your company who come forward and admit to having multi accounted in the coming weeks? Along with this what other then money has motivated you to change your stance on outing employees who have cheated when it has seemed to be a long standing policy of yours to say nothing.

When you were notified that employees of yours were cheating why did you decide to keep it to yourself rather then out these players?

Why is it that Brian Townsend has cheated multiple times but he is still a lead pro with your site?

Do you feel that the "about us" section of your site where you have player profiles is accurate at the current time for pros that teach on your site?

What is cardrunners stance on the fact that people who pay a monthly fee to your site have been misinformed and had money stolen from them by the unethical actions of your employees?

Taylor doesn't have to satisfy this community nor address your questions. His business will suffer or thrive based upon the quality of the instructional videos and active participation of coaches in the forums. Poker playing consumers will determine if Cardrunners is successful or not, not the screwballs of 2+2.
03-27-2010 , 04:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ledfoot




Taylor doesn't have to satisfy this community nor address your questions. His business will suffer or thrive based upon the quality of the instructional videos and active participation of coaches in the forums. Poker playing consumers will determine if Cardrunners is successful or not, not the screwballs of 2+2.
Clearly the "screwballs of 2+2" make up at least a reasonable % of the "poker playing consumers" who will determine if cardrunners is successful or not.

And the question MM asked was if the community felt that it was time to restart relations with cardrunners. It seems that it would be important for taylor to answer some things to the members of 2p2 before that would happen.

nice post tho!
03-27-2010 , 05:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by duh
A lawyer probably did write it for him.
No, I think he was just mentored by Lee Jones and has learned to act as a CEO operating a multi-million dollar per year business should.

Look at the way CEO's reply to any scandal when they do so on 2+2 (or anywhere). Long, professional reply's that inevitably skip some of the more nasty allegations or questions. Because Taylor is 20something does not mean he should not reply in this way - that is exactly what he should do.
03-27-2010 , 05:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fees
and rightfully so
I mean sure, but this guy was tooting the CR horn so hard for so many years, and now he seems to genuinely HATE TC, which not many people who have met him do (from my understanding and knowledge of certain high stakes social circles). Just wondering what the deal is, as it seems to be more than hating a guy who knowingly works with/employs multiaccounters.
03-27-2010 , 05:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fees
its not his response, its the reaction to his response, theres nothing he can say to make it better there should just be outrage and intolerance of this behavior, instead he was praised which is just " wtf did u even read this thread?"
His response to this situation was about 10x better than his response to any other scandal involving his company. Even though this response was what absolutely should have been done at a minimum, people see it as going above and beyond. That's fine, though. Rarely do we get as close to justice in a scandal as we did here, so I definitely think the community should be at least somewhat satisfied.
03-27-2010 , 09:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by duh
A lawyer should've written it for him.
edited
03-27-2010 , 09:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by grindplz
I don't see how Taylor's response is at all good or satisfying to the community. Over the past few years he has learned that major people from his company have been taking part in cheating and each time has not outed this information. Instead he has allowed 2p2ers to get cheated out of additional money and not acted until someone else has come forward outing the multi accounting.
+1
03-27-2010 , 09:24 PM
the whole poker industry has a long history of just forgiving and forgetting people that cheat. No reason to think anything is going to change with this most recent scandal.
03-27-2010 , 09:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tdomeski
You seem to have a clear personal vendetta against CR and the people that run their site. I remember (you might not) you being the reason I even looked into getting a subscription to CR because of how high you were praising it when we were playing in a live 10/20 game at TS in Nov 2006.

Obviously there has been some sort of fallout between then and now, but without clarification it seems, to me at least, that you are just out to troll TC as hard as possible.

a lot has changed since 2006, lol. And I would say I have a different perspective than most having been sorta affiliated briefly with the site, and knowing many of the people who worked for it.


and people who lie and decieve deserve worse than being "trolled" by a few posters.

Last edited by AceCR9; 03-27-2010 at 10:04 PM.
03-27-2010 , 09:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tdomeski
His response to this situation was about 10x better than his response to any other scandal involving his company. Even though this response was what absolutely should have been done at a minimum, people see it as going above and beyond. That's fine, though. Rarely do we get as close to justice in a scandal as we did here, so I definitely think the community should be at least somewhat satisfied.
well yeah but its not that he responds its that his company has a bit of a penchant for this stuff, what happens afterwards is kind of trivial
03-28-2010 , 02:46 AM
he made a business decision. live with it people. business and ethics are unfortunately two words that should never be used in the same sentence. not saying his decision/response was or wasn't totally unethical but he has to protect himself.
03-28-2010 , 02:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane Stewart
he made a business decision. live with it people. business and ethics are unfortunately two words that should never be used in the same sentence. not saying his decision/response was or wasn't totally unethical but he has to protect himself.
i dont even know what point you are trying to make, this post seems to not relate with any train of thought discussed
03-28-2010 , 06:51 AM
Has anyone else seen this commercial and immediately related it to the unwashed NVG masses infiltrating this thread, the HSNL *** thread, and the KidPoker strat threads?
03-28-2010 , 02:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane Stewart
he made a business decision. live with it people. business and ethics are unfortunately two words that should never be used in the same sentence. not saying his decision/response was or wasn't totally unethical but he has to protect himself.
Oh, bull****. Then any business you're associated with cannot be trusted, is that what you mean? Business and ethics definitely can go together, and you're just putting yourself into an unethical category of people.
03-28-2010 , 02:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clayton
Has anyone else seen this commercial and immediately related it to the unwashed NVG masses infiltrating this thread, the HSNL *** thread, and the KidPoker strat threads?
wow, perfect.

      
m