Eurolinx (Prima) - Rigged? - Page 7 - High Stakes Poker Pot Limit and No Limit

I don't think that 56 hand proves anything I had a hand HU 10/20 vs MrDawwe where we were 8k deep and I got my aces all in PF vs his 23 soooted and he flopped the nuts on a A45 board and held. They are just ******ed fish who have run good over a few thousand hands no big deal.

There are people stacking off with 23s pf at 10/20? I need to build a bankroll so I can play these clowns. Did he call all-in or shove? Shove I can understand but call...

09-05-2009 , 08:48 PM

#152

Jeezay

banned

Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 56

Quote:

Originally Posted by MDMA

Uhm Jeezay, you are severly misinformed. They might not have been knowingly trying to scam people, but they defended the site/owners (before all hell broke lose) against all the arguments and evidence brought forth by a whole community about their "sponsors" having been involved in multiple pyramid scams before. They called people lame/stupid/uninformed and the evidence "random personal attacks without solid foundation". They would not listen to reason. They never did apologize for that.

If you think them being sponsored by T6 is "so what", you are mistaken. The fact they did NOT read up on who they selected to use their names with and not only that, they later refused to listen to the overwhelming evidence that pointed to it all being a big scam, does make them guilty as well, albeit not to the degree of the people behind it all.

k MDMA seems like you know a whole lot more information about this then i do so i suppose your right

..
they didnt know what they were promoting a scam company and in the end they needed to pay with their reputation and also with their account balance as everyone else, so as u said they are guilty for defending something they didnt knew what it was.. seems like i was really missinformed about how it actually was.

09-06-2009 , 11:05 AM

#153

noname6520

veteran

Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 3,414

fds is like the only person who is thinking in this thread. what does it matter that a robber cheated at a poker game? He is a robber. first deal with that.

12-05-2009 , 08:07 PM

#154

walkmyline

veteran

Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 2,340

Quote:

Originally Posted by mathemagician54

I agree with the above poster that fionn's hand doesn't prove anything, but people trying to argue against the superuser claim have to realize that the people making these claims played in the biggest games there regularly, and know what they are talking about. Fionn, tommy, etc have all played a lot of high stakes hands online, and it is alarming that such people have come to the conclusion that something seemed off on the site.

There are a bunch of names who pop up out of nowhere with 100k+ bankrolls, play awfully in the biggest games offered on the site, win some, and then disappear (all within the span of like, a day or a week).

Whether the claim is that somebody can see your cards, or the RNG is rigged, or whatever, I don't really know. But who the hell deposits 100k onto a site, plays for a day, wins some money, and withdraws it all? (i'm assuming they withdraw, or else they just keep 100k+ sitting there doing nothing.) I've never seen it anywhere, but I guess I haven't been paying that much attention to it.

Hmmm so My sites failing, I have technology available to make up 5-10 random accounts a week, which are rigged with zero chance to lose money. What am I going to do as the site owner, or af*****ates.

Step 1 Make account Step 2 win money Step 3 close accounts move on to another new account I created to win some more money. Repeat process

Overall Plan = Sucking money out of the general poker players hands and into my special off shore account not linked to my failing site. The books get worse on my site, my offshore account gets fatter and fatter.

That account would fatten up quick

IS THIS WHAT PEOPLE ARE INSINUATING IS HAPPENING? BECAUSE IT DOESNT SEEM SO FAR FETCHED.

People really underestimate how shady and greedy people get in this world regarding control of currency. Our own government takes our tax money, has FED lend it to banks, and banks turn around and lend it back to us at interest = rigged

Wake up hahaha. Anything to do with money, and large sums of it causes greed, and shadiness.

To think this or other countries strongest hackers dont have the ability to hack these sites for profits quietly and slowly, to think RNG are truly random and all accounts have same chance of winning or losing, IS FOOLISH

Just my opinion though.

12-08-2009 , 05:33 PM

#155

The flying-donkey

old hand

Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 1,374

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hercules

what it rly comes down to is IF and HOW MUCH Sony\MG guarantee for their product.

I don't mean to be a douche, but this analogy is a little flawed as maunfactors can be liable for tortious damages caused by their products (at least in the commonwealth, and would be interested to see if there is a similar case in the USA). The case in question was Donoghue v Stevenson (1932).

However I do agree to at least some degree that the software designer is not responsible for how their clients choose to use their software, as long as it is within the terms of that products.

Another question is where is this company based (registered headquaters, pays its taxes etc)? As juridistiction and the likes within Europe are generally governed by the Brussels Regulations, which are irritatingly precise and quite accessible to the legally-uninclined (no expensive lawyer).

05-07-2010 , 02:29 AM

#156

Slap My Jack

veteran

Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 3,158

Ninja bump to spite Microscamming.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dobinuvik

This could also be done by the site you sign up through which I assume would be some rakeback provider. Any chance all you guys who feel you were playing superuser all signed up through same provider or affiliate? The amounts of money involved means that someone will always try something like this. There are plenty of people who have the skills to do so.

I believe the affiliate I signed up through was done through a reputable affiliate/player. But you don't download the software from them. You go directly to Eurolinx's site.

Quote:

Originally Posted by rivermedry

this is absurd
i play middle to high stakes at MG for like 3 years.
from the SN you mentioned fromsparta is a loose-agg player who
is probably one of the biggest losers in prima history.in his visits to 25-50 plo
he is down like more than 200k alone.so he caught his run against you - big deal
loose-agg players are bound to win some hugh sessions,wayneo is also a super donkey
who rarely leaves the table with money.does anyone on ths thread have a serious
player who they feel is "rigged"????
the rigged theory raises its ugly head from now and than but i havent seen any serious
proof of this.

Reg date Aug 09. 3 posts. 1st post is this to this thread.

I guess we should just take your word for it?

Quote:

Originally Posted by eso

Assuming Eurolinx is rigged. And none of the other Microgaming skins are rigged.
This means Eurolinx superusers can only cheat other eurolinx users.(??)
But Microgaming provides the software.
And so if Eurolinx is rigged via software provided by Microgaming, then surely the other Microgaming skins are affected by this?
Therefore all Microgaming skins are rigged.
But they're not...?
I don't get it.

The software is provided by Microgaming. Eurolinx then customizes the software and makes the Eurolinx version available for download from their own web servers.

This customization could include a custom trojan. It need only be as complex as sending a packet containing table name and hole cards dealt back to Eurolinx's servers.

05-07-2010 , 10:07 AM

#157

bigt2k4

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 15,296

lol Microgaming, facebook poker is probably more reputable

05-07-2010 , 10:21 AM

#158

Stewie_Griffin

banned

Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 554

I was about to make a similar thread about Poker Stars. I am down about 150 buy-ins in EV all-in there and it seems like I get coolered at a 2:1 ratio. Should I create a new thread or can this be like an official thread for rigged online poker?

05-07-2010 , 12:10 PM

#159

_RossDvd_

adept

Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 710

where do I go to get a refund for the time it took me to read this guff?

all this pathetic conjecture, yea i lost to a fish once/ ran badmust be rigged/superuser

11 pages and only hh are one fish call with 56s and 3 completely standard hands that prove literally nothing.

05-07-2010 , 12:24 PM

#160

aggrocallerOOP

veteran

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 3,004

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stewie_Griffin

garph

05-07-2010 , 01:45 PM

#161

rilleg

journeyman

Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 207

Quote:

Originally Posted by kotkis

Guess I worded my post badly. I don't know him personally but I've seen him play and I find the whole superuser theory pretty far fetched. I've hardly ever played on prima but my friends play there and I've sweated them.

i know him personally, he is a good friend of mine. He was played alot on stars,ub and ftp too. He has a very strange playing style but is a very intelligent person...

Page 7 of 7

First

2 3 4 5 6 7

Last

...

Page 7 of 7

First

2 3 4 5 6 7

Last