this is a 5k bet regarding a 150k bet regarding a 300k+ bet on a 1.5m bet. Needless to say some involved are without the means to settle the bets despite "crushing" macau.
[6:03:15 PM] David Williams: hey
[6:03:25 PM] Justin Bonomo: hey
[6:04:14 PM] David Williams: i don't think viffer tried to cheat w/ the logs btw, what was left out changed nothing about my decision, it was actually stuff that reinforced my decision
[6:04:19 PM] David Williams: i think it was from using multiple machines
[6:04:27 PM] Justin Bonomo: ya i know
[6:04:28 PM] David Williams: it wasn't cherry picked
[6:04:48 PM] David Williams: just saw he was getting trashed in 2+2 about it, and i don't post or normally every read it
[6:04:55 PM] David Williams: so if you can post i said that would be good
[6:05:16 PM] Justin Bonomo: ok, i kind of did already, but i will again with a direct quote this time
So David Williams thought that Viffer leaving stuff out that actually reinforced his decision to find against Viffer is proof that Viffer had no intention of cheating by omitting it?
Cool logic Dave
He said the stuff left out made no difference to his decision, meaning it wasn't as if viffer was intentionally leaving stuff out that would make him lose the bet.