Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeeJustin
Viffer: You have both lied multiple times ITT and have been legitimately flat out incorrect multiple times ITT. Stop pretending like you are infallible. Furthermore, you don't seem to understand, ALL BETS WERE IMPLICITLY MADE ON TOM AND DAN'S TERMS. If you bet on an NFL game, the NFL determines the winner. If the refs make a terrible call, you have no recourse. If you bet on a side bet between Tom and Dan, then Tom and Dan determine the winner. Your sports book argument is invalid. Furthermore, any reputable book would clearly state cancellation terms. If you didn't clearly state anything, then you have to go by Tom and Dan's terms. End of story.
Danny: This isn't a rain delay. This challenge could have been finished years ago. Most people ITT believe Tom is the reason why it hasn't finished, and you haven't given a good argument as to why that's not true. If you want to have any ground to stand on, you need to argue that Tom is not responsible for the delay. Given that the delay started long before Black Friday, stop using Black Friday as your only argument.
Why are you guys trying to play the rain delay card when hands are going to be played soon? You clearly should have done this when the terrible FTP news came out. That's the time to talk to the people you have bets with, not now. Bringing these issues up now makes you look really bad.
PLease explain why im so wrong, what did i lie about?
If its so invalid can we bet? Take my money please.
I have been put at an unfair advantage by some thing that could never have been seen. You say that im so wrong yet its just your opinion. You have no factual basis for this, just your high moral standards? Your since of fairness?
Its not the rain delay, its the unfair advantage the rain delay caused.
Justin, if you didnt play online for 3 years, or your right to play online was taken away could you come back and play world class poker?
I have said this to jungleman the last two world series, its not like this is some thing new, its just some thing that needs to be brought up now as it looks like thre hands are abpout to get played.
And NO all bet werent made on tom and junglemans terms,
How much did you bet on the side getting 3-1? But alot of other bets were made that also werent the same as dan and toms.
Justin you are biased, and not open minded at all. It must be nice to be prosecuter and judge at same time!
Does one not playing any sport affect there ability to play?
Quote:
Viffer and Daniel,
How would you feel if your roles were reversed? What if you had big bets on durrrr and jungle was down 25bi+ and avoiding him for months before Black Friday, then after BF when asked about finishing the challenge on another site said he would prefer to wait until FTP came back up, then when FTP came back up he stalled even longer?
You of course still take the same stance right?
No, I would argue and fight just like they are doing. No one likes to feel like they are getting taken advantage of, it really sucks. Would i be right? IM sure i could argue both sides, anyone could. Im just willing to bet that i am argueing the right side this time.
Should the challenge been finished before Bf, maybe, but it wasnt and we are here.
Does Tom not playing for 3 years or not playing much impact his game? The people who bet on the side are being put at an unfair advantage caused by some thing no one could see coming.
We dont know what would of happened if BF didnt come, but the fact is that it did and it sucks.
Last edited by viffer; 09-12-2013 at 02:58 AM.