Mers, I've read somewhere on 2p2 that HEM red line "multiplies" the sample size about 3 times (meaning that x% EV over 10k sample = x% actual ROI over 30k), is that more or less true? Thanks

Sounds like too high and too blanket of a multiplier.

Your wish has come true! Be careful, you only have two more. The government absolutely can try to recover the distributions paid to FTP owners, including fraudulently obtained assets.

Psychological bankroll is just going to depend too much on your personal makeup. The difference between turbos and STs in bankroll calculations is your ROI, and then really it's personal from there.

I know that psychological br is gonna be a personal thing. That is why I asked for p, not for x.

I know it is ROI dependant, but the function is not linear (is it?).

So any guess/estimation? Lets say, for examples sake, that I expect my ROI to drop from 5% to 2.5%. Do I need 2 times bigger bankroll to feel the same amount of swingpain? (Must... not... make a sex joke about swing pain )

You're the government. You recover 35% of the total funds owed to FTP players.

Who do you pay and how much?

Hey Mers, Thank you for your answer. I have an other question. Me and my friend have a lot of videos from you. I made a screenshot from your BB endgame strategy video, about the table "Villain Opening Ranges that make Ax 3bet-shoves Break-Even", and my friend has that screenshot too, but you show 2 different screenshots in your video, I mean the title is the same, but the numbers are different. I dont want share the whole table, but I'll show a small part of them.

Why are differences between the to tables, which are the same?

links dont work but thats probably for the better,since you shouldn´t openly share husng.com material.

Sorry, i didnt know. I'll delete them.

So I cant tell you the exactly time, when you showed that, but I tell you 2 differences (but all the numbers are different!)

At the first table the A3o 30bb deep is 62/93, in the other its 54/80. What is the differences between the two charts?

I don't know anything about your swingpain.

Everybody who files a claim to their account 35%. Additional pro-rated payment after a period of time (a year or so) with whatever money is left from unclaimed funds.

Not sure, sounds like an error.

Kinda silly question, but people started asking about videos from husng and stuff, so here it goes:

I'm playing $15 at stars, mostly turbos although I did play hypers for a while, but I don't feel very confident playing hypers. I have a standard membership on HUSNG, the important question is: what do you think is more worth the money for someone playing the stakes I play (and supposedly a winning player): paying premium membership on husng or paying for a read only access on FastTrack?

I thought reading on husng.com that the standard membership would be more than sufficient for my current level and stakes, but seems like specially for hypers there's a lack of videos (I watched pretty much everything from Cog, some from Rypac but some of them are old, newer ones are okay but nothing new to me really) even for lower stakes.

That's going to depend a lot on the kind of learner you are, whether you like to absorb information by watching/by reading, etc. It also depends on what Hokie sets as the read only price for the next month. I think both are definitely decent options although the premium membership for a month is a bit cheaper and spending 10BI on coaching for the FastTrack is really only a good idea if you're planning on making poker a long term pursuit.

Sorry if this has already been asked, but how would you recommend learning hypers? There's nowhere near the material out there that there is for reg/turbo HUSNG.

The main point I'm thinking of getting the premium membership is because I can actually download pretty much everything and I don't need to watch it all during the month I'm paying for it. Other than that important things are: I do play/study poker pretty much every day for an average of 3 hours a day, but I'm not willing to commit more than that for now (and probably for a long time anyway).

I don't know what you mean for a "long term pursuit", I don't really think I'm going to quit it anytime soon, just not going to play 7 hours a day either.

Does that change anything really?

Thanks btw

By long term pursuit I just mean that it's going to be some part of your life for quite some time, otherwise it's not worth the investment (other than the added fun value of being better at it).

Can you give more examples of those "aha" moments?

Answered I believe.

How important you think being good at math really is? Is there anyone who actually calculates more complex stuff like villains range/equity while playing? What would you say are really the important things that knowing the math will give us an edge? (pot odds and implied odds probably go here I'd guess, although that's more basic math that anyone playing poker should know)

Considering we never have exact numbers about villain's ranges, math will only give us an exact equity based on our hand reading (guess) about villain's range, so our "guessing skills" are probably more important than our math skills.

Would you tell what type of math calculations you do while on the tables? Like do you ever stove (no time for that really imo, but maybe someone used to it could use it quickly), I assume you don't do precise math calculations, but probably you do some simplified math calcs to give you a general idea of your situation.

Thanks

The question kind of depends on what you consider math. Does math have to be actual calculation, or can it just be a general sense of "he seems to be doing that too much for me to do this"? Most of the best players in the world understand frequencies without having to actually do calculations with them. I'd argue that too is math. You don't need to have a calculator and make 3bet shoving tables in order to be assessing expected value based on your observations. You need to do that well, period, and to me that's mathematical understanding even if the assessments are made from intuition. Geeks shouldn't be snobs.

I was not considering "math" like that because you're not using numbers or doing any calculations. Yes, you're making assumptions based on frequencies but you're not really thinking about numbers and it's much more based on intuition than actual calculations.

However, if we include that type of thinking on the "math" part, how would you answer my previous questions?

I basically never do any math in the middle of a HUSNG by that definition.

Sorry, I think I didn't write it right. I meant "if we include that type of thinking" = if we consider "intuition" based on frequencies and this kind of stuff as math.

Oops, sorry, misunderstood. I'm not really sure how to help here - a lot of what I say will sound really general ("understand how a range does against another range!"). I'm not doing any kind of spectacular calculations at the tables. I'm just better at doing the boring ones.

An open letter about being ranked off of the top 10 in the latest HUSNG sejjeturbo power rankings:

lol that was good

hahahahahaha outstanding.

"Who do you think taught you to jam threes?" LMAO