Quote:
Originally Posted by AnJo280
If you define a wet flop by having 1 possible Flushdraw and at least 2 possible Gutshot draws out there and dry flops by anything else what is the probability of each?
like 30%/70% ? i cant think of a way to figure that out and you´ll be probably more helpfull than the poker theory subforum.
I've been told flopzilla does this. For once, I prefer good ol' intuition for figuring these situations out. T98r doesn't seem like a dry flop though
.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrbambocha
[LIST][*]How much harder was it to get to where you are, compared to how much effort you thought you had to put in to be one of the best?
It's a hard question to answer. I worked hard to get where I got but it didn't feel like "work", and definitely not work with the focus of eventually become one of the best (which I still wouldn't consider myself, by the way, unless you're defining that rather broadly).
It's somewhat similar in my new job. I'm working my ass off but it's because "**** you I want to solve this" (the **** you is not directed at anyone in particular), not because of a conscious "here I am putting in work so that it may pay off in the end". Similarly, when I played matches against very good players, that determination kicks in of wanting to focus and learn and play well, but I'm not thinking about working hard to get to be the best. It's something more primal/intrinsically motivated than that, an innate determination that seems independent from actually thinking about the long term ramifications of where I could get to if I do well.
Quote:
[*]How many hours do you think you have put into poker, lifetime?
God, it's a lot. I think 6,000 is a pretty reasonable guess. That's about 3 per day for 5 years, which seems about right, given that there's a total of about 2 years in there where I played no poker. Trying to count 2+2/recreational games/other poker related activity.
Quote:
[*]How did you balance - grinding, HH, forum, videos, any other method?
I tried to treat it like a job, especially the forum and my videos. When you coach other people you're responsible for not just yourself, and I took that to heart very early on. One of the biggest pieces of feedback I got when I gave students surveymonkeys to fill out was that my professionalism was very good/unusual, and I take pride in that.
For yourself, you just really have to focus on what's actually helping. There's a lot of masturbatory studying out there and things people learn to make themselves feel better about their poker knowledge, but don't matter at all (see: Chubokov tables).
Quote:
[*]How big is it to get coaching? How often and how much coaching would you recommend, or when? Lets say that a player starts of the year with 1k. He plays the 30's with an ROI of 3% and he plays 100 hours a month. Every quarter of the year he gets 5-10 hours coaching. Where would you see the player at the end of the year compared to if he didn't get any coaching at all.
There's going to be a ton of variance here based on the coach and the student. I think coaching can be very valuable given the right circumstances, just like any investment (you have to pick one with good expectation in general, and one that's right for your personal situation).
You have to be careful in thinking about this because just getting the coaching tends to indicate that one player is more focused on learning and moving up.
If you want a general expectation, the one who gets coaching will have modest gains against the one who doesn't, more than making it worth it given the right coach and right fit.
Quote:
[*]What are the 3 main factors/abilities that separates a winner from a breakeven player?
Just too broad, sorry. Talent, discipline, and life balance, but that's a pretty generic answer. The real answer is just being good at poker or not good at poker and that's hard to break down into 3 main strategy leaks or anything like that.
I generally like to respond to troll questions in kind, but surprise's Qs were too boring to work with.