Quote:
Originally Posted by ohly
i don't know your reasons for 4 tabling, but in my experience it is almost never a good thing at such low stakes. especially when you have low confidence in your game like you do right now, thinking about every spot and lowering the variance by playing 1 table helps you to stay positive.
also, while games against better opponents usually require more in depth though processes, don't underestimate low stakes games. the average opponent being dumb as wood does not mean you can own them without thinking at all, autopiloting 4 tables or whatever. the extra valuebet against a stationy villain and the herocall when a line doesn't make sense that you can make when you focus on a single opponent make up alot of your winnings in hyperturbos. not to mention preflop adjustments which are really hard to optimize against 4 opponents at the same time.
My main reason for in 4 tabling is "to learn to 2 table", and I think I'm almost there. Basically I consider the best way to drastically increase tables is to go way overloaded, try and keep up, eventually manage to do it then drop down to what was before too many, in this case 2. also going from 1 to 2 tables is the biggest jump!
I also know it's an often stated opinion in this forum that people shouldn't multitable the lowest stake, however I think it's exactly the stake people should play when trying to learn how to multitable, I'd never suggest someone who plays say one table of $30s should one day just commit to banging out the games there four at once, it is a dangerous thing to increase tables and imo it's best done in a safe place.
Unfortunately it variance and low ev adjusted win at this lowest stake has indeed knocked my confidence further, that's coming off a horrible run at the $7s that started my whole "learn to multitable" line this past month. I will def be backing off the 4 tables, but going back to one I'd rather not, so long as there isn't too detrimental an effect on my winrate. and that will take time to find out I guess.
Reasons I think I'm much better off playing 2 tables are mainly that I find it very hard to put in volume 1 tabling - there's a chance to take a break after each and every game, not including when some tit makes you wait 30 seconds - and I'm pretty bad at "oh I'll just check that 1 web page between games.. ooh new article!". Playing at least 2, it's much easier to just keep loading as they finish and keep focus. Another reason is kinda similar - I find it much easier to detatch from results playing 2+ tables. Playing only one it is very easy to notice, in fact almost impossible not to notice how many I've won/lost in a row. that's bad, I'd much rather not know. but I find it impossible not to keep track when it's only the one game. playing 2 and constantly loading, it takes a few games but then it's quite easy to not know where I am at for a session, and unless things go real bad there's enough occasional wins or losses frequently that it's quite easy to not keep track, an additional "benefit" is there's another table to look at instead of sweating cards when there's an allin
Lots of words lol tl;dr